Donald Trump says talks with Iran are “progressing well” as he urges Muslim countries to join the Abraham Accords.
The US President said it would only take one big deal for everyone or no deal at all – meaning “a return to the battlefield and firing, but bigger and stronger than ever”.
Trump said it should be mandatory for Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan and Bahrain to sign the Abraham Accords, noting “all the work the United States has done to try to pull this complex puzzle together”.
He said, “It may be possible that one or two have a reason for not doing it, and that will be accepted, but the majority should be ready, willing and able to make this deal with Iran a much more historic event than it otherwise would have been.”
I am requesting that all countries immediately sign the Abraham Accords, and if Iran signs its agreement with me as president of the United States, it would be an honour for them to also be part of this unique world alliance.
Manchester United could not be more generous in offering two potential new signings should they choose to move this summer.
Two current players who are obstacles are Sandro Tonali and Ederson. (Photo: Pedro Por/MB Media/Getty Images)
Manchester United are unlikely to be able to offer Sandro Tonali and Ederson their current squad numbers if they move to Old Trafford this summer.
Michael Carrick is keen to get midfield reinforcements early to replace the departing Casemiro and other possible costs. Reports suggest Newcastle’s Tonali and Serie A star Ederson are high on United’s preference list.
TalkSPORT claim United have agreed a verbal deal with Atalanta star Ederson on a five-year contract. People understand that the two clubs are in talks over a £43million move.
In recent months, Newcastle’s failure to reach European football has heavily linked Tonali with United and fuelled his pursuit. The Magpies are seeking £86m for the Italian midfielder but could be willing to sell due to their low position in the Premier League, with reports in Italy suggesting United are confident of signing both.
Ederson has just one year left on his contract with Atalanta but the Serie A side are apparently holding firm on their price. If United are to drop a combined £129m on the two midfielders, they will aim to settle them quickly.
But the club cannot give the two players their squad numbers, so it cannot give them a possible welcome gift. Tonali has worn the number eight since his days at AC Milan, but there is a giant star he won’t be removing from that number at United.
Bruno Fernandes holds the shirt from the 2022/23 season after wearing the number 18 for his first three years at the club. The United captain also previously wore his current number at Sporting CP and Udinese and is undoubtedly Carrick’s star man.
Sandro Tonali will almost certainly be barred from taking his current squad number at United. (Photo: Giorgi ARJEVANIDZE / AFP via Getty Images)
The Portugal international has been linked with a move away before, but it doesn’t look like he’ll be going anywhere at Old Trafford anytime soon. The number 18 shirt is now available after Casemiro’s departure, which Tonali can claim.
Ederson, meanwhile, has worn No. 13 full-time in Atlanta. He has been out of No. 15 and No. 40 at previous clubs but has been rapping single digits for the past six years.
However, Patrick Dorgo claimed that when he joined United in the 2025 winter window, he had worn it throughout his senior professional career. Dorgu is currently tied up until at least 2030.
Ederson may be forced to reconsider the cut number. (Photo: Image Photo Agency/Getty Images)
Patrick Dorgo is the current owner of No. 13. (Photo: Mark Cosgrove/News Images/Noor Photo via Getty Images)
Ederson is the next number 12 after the club confirmed the departure of Tyrell Malacia. Nos. 19 and 22 are also vacant if the Brazilian opts for a complete switch to United.
Both Fernandes and Dorgo appear to feature in Carrick’s long-term plans as he looks to a future with United. The former club captain’s permanent appointment was confirmed earlier this month, and he is keen to help any newcomers settle in seamlessly.
But Carrick will have to rely on something other than squad numbers if he is to land Tonalley and Ederson in a double swoop this summer.
London’s fire service responded on Wednesday to a blaze in the Golders Green neighbourhood, home to a large Jewish community that has been the target of several arson attacks in recent months, but police said the fire was “non-suspicious.”
Pictures from the scene showed flames from the Kosher Kingdom Jewish supermarket and plumes of black smoke rising above the area’s main shopping street.
Amid widespread reports of the fire being caused by an electrical fault on Wednesday morning, London Fire Brigade Assistant Commissioner Craig Carter told reporters at the scene that “the circumstances of the fire do not appear to be suspicious at this time”.
“We are now able to confirm that the fire at a warehouse in Golders Green is non-suspicious,” London’s Metropolitan Police later said in a social media message. He said the force understood that “this incident will cause concern and disruption to the local community. … We would like to reassure residents that there is no indication of any targeted or deliberate act.”
The fire brigade had earlier said it had mobilised 15 fire engines and around 100 firefighters after receiving dozens of calls about the fire.
The scene of a fire at Kosher Kingdom, a Jewish supermarket in the Golders Green section of London, on May 27, 2026.
“The fire has affected the ground floor shop and the storage area at the rear of the shop,” the statement said.
“A large amount of smoke is coming out from the fire,” it said. People are also urged to stay away from the area “while firefighters work to extinguish the blaze”.
London’s Metropolitan Police said it was too early to determine the cause of the fire, but fortunately, there were no reports of injuries.
Local residents walk through the cordoned-off area where a supermarket fire broke out in the Golders Green neighbourhood of London on May 27, 2026.
It follows a series of arson attacks in recent months at synagogues and Jewish community sites in and around Golders Green in northwest London.
the area saw knife attack. Two Jewish men were targeted in late April, prompting Britain to increase your national threat level from “substantial” to “severe”.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood described the attack as “despicable” and a “despicable act of terrorism.”
A little-known group linked to Iran, Harakat Ashab al-Yameen al-Islamiyya (HAYI), has claimed responsibility for several incidents.
In response, the London Police created a new “Community Protection Team” to protect the Jewish community in the capital, initially consisting of 100 additional officers. The force said last month it would combine neighbourhood policing with “specialist security and counter-terrorism capabilities”.
Community members have described living in fear and shock. Following a recent series of anti-Semitic attacks.
Police said officers were at the scene of Wednesday’s fire “assisting firefighters with road closures and evacuations”.
Arsenal face Paris Saint-Germain in the Champions League final and by ending their wait for the Premier League title, the Gunners have banished the fear, tension and doubt that plagued previous campaigns, writes betting guru Lewis Jones. He has three tips for big…
Paris Saint-Germain v Arsenal, Champions League Final, Saturday 5pm
Arsenal winning the Premier League is a significant shift for me in terms of betting on the game.
Arsenal are 11/10 with Sky Bet to win Saturday’s final – whether in 90 minutes, extra time or on penalties – and complete the double. PSG are 8/11 favourites to lift the trophy for a second consecutive time.
I think these odds should be closer to each other, as the psychology of this Champions League final feels largely lacking in betting. I was expecting the market to move more favourably towards Arsenal since they won the Premier League – but that hasn’t moved at all.
Image: Mikel Arteta has overcome a major psychological barrier by winning the Premier League.
Arms has almost taken the full force of being a man. But winning the Premier League changes everything.
That monkey is off their back now. Finally, the emotional release of ending the line matters. You could see it at events – it can now suddenly be a detachment from the fear of failure.
This final is now framed as an opportunity rather than an obligation.
Winning the Champions League and completing the double would take this season into legendary territory – but if they fall short, they are still Premier League champions.
Weapons are chasing a bonus reward. This approach makes weapons dangerous.
And even with just one tactical setup, I think Arsenal are very well equipped to stop PSG from having the space and territory to really hurt them. Mikel Arteta will make it ugly and create a game where whoever defends best wins.
The Gunners have kept nine clean sheets in their last 14 Champions League games – the axis of David Raya, William Saliba and Gabriel is as world-class in their work as the PSG front three of Khvicha Kvaratskhelia, Ousmane Dembélé and Désiré Doué.
Arsenal have yet to relinquish open play in the knockout stages – and three of the four goals they scored in the league stage came in the last two games when qualification was confirmed and they were on the prowl.
This is a defence that can lead them to glory.
When it comes to prop markets, these value matches are full of betting opportunities.
One angle I always like to focus on in the final is the foul. The increased risk, extra incentive and good chance that a game of this magnitude goes horribly wrong mean these markets tend to see more false averages than price-maximising algorithms.
The average of the last 30 Europa League and Champions League finals is 28.5 fouls per 90.
For context, the average Premier League game this season has seen 21.5 fouls per 90 games. The Champions League has averaged 22.5 fouls per game.
So from a basic lack of data on a very good sample size, you could probably add six fouls to the expected average of a major European final.
This means there is a great opportunity to back a player in player-foul markets.
Bukayo Saka is the best bet to score two or more fouls at 11/10 with Skybet.
As with all bets in the player foul market, the matchup is absolutely key and Saka’s fight with Nuno Mendes is sure to ‘file’.
Mendes is drawing 1.7 fouls per 90 this season and readily falls with minimal contact. Sacca, a heavy foul-drawer himself, can be quite a nuisance with his tackling, especially in big games, and is working to a 1.4 per 90 strike rate over his last 20 games.
He had two or more fouls in his last two starts against Burnley and West Ham – and to top it all off, Saka picked up two fouls in both knockout matches against Mendes last season with PSG.
Image:
long shot…
Set-pieces are another area where Arsenal have an advantage over PSG.
The Gunners have scored the most set-piece goals (24) and goals from corners (18) in the Premier League.
If you go back to the second leg meeting between these two last season, Arsenal scored 0.77 expected goals from set pieces in Paris. It was raining in the long throws – it was a very set-piece-heavy strategy. Expect the same again.
So all the usual tactics for a set-piece-based bet are on the table here with Gabriel being the obvious starting point. However, the odds of 15/2 for him to score are quite slim with Skybet. We can be greedier than that.
If he is going to score, the goal is obviously likely to come from a corner, so the way to play Gabriel Angle is to play two bets with the BuildABet function.
Gabriel to score and Declan Rice to assist – that’s 25/1.
And Gabriel to score and Saka to assist – also 25/1.
Image: Gabriel is 25/1 to score, assisted by either Declan Rice or Saka.
In the last two seasons, this exact type of bet has happened five times in the Premier League and Champions League.
And the chances created for a Rice-to-Gabriel or Sacca-to-Gabriel combo have happened 39 times over the past two seasons.
Of course, we also have the added bonus of two bets being able to land at separate times in the match – so, if Gabriel scores and Saka or Rhys assists another Arsenal goal, the bets will still land the same. Source link
While Trump hosted a Cabinet meeting that aired live, he linked the two countries.
“I don’t go to war; I go to conflict,” he said, referring to the ongoing situation in the Middle East and rising tensions between the US and Iran, as no peace deal has yet been negotiated.
He then added: “Despite the conflict with Venezuela, which lacks a navy, lacks an air force, and lacks many of the people who were taking the country to terrible places.”
When the President made this mistake, he did not panic nor correct himself; he referred to Venezuela while talking about the destruction caused by the US in Iran, which he has widely claimed.
“His leadership is gone. His second leadership is gone. We’re dealing with half of his third because half of his third is also gone,” Trump said.
The moment has gone viral online, with social media users calling it “alarming” and also claiming it is further evidence of the president’s “cognitive decline.”
Trump visited Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Tuesday for another health checkup, his third medical appointment in 13 months.
Despite concerns, Trump embraced TruthSocial as soon as the appointment ended.
He wrote, “Just completed my 6-month physical at Walter Reed Military Medical Center. Everything checked out perfectly. Thank you to the wonderful doctors and staff! We are going back to the White House. President DJT.”
Although the leader confirmed that he is fit and healthy, doctors have analysed the president’s behaviour and fear that something is wrong.
On several occasions he has been caught dozing off during Cabinet meetings.
“Chronic insomnia is a serious disease. It can result in an increased risk of dementia and decreased cognitive performance in older people,” Dr Jonathan Renner told CNN.
America has had a plutonium problem for decades. About 100 tonnes of the material was used to make powerful nuclear bombs during the Cold War. But athey destroyed nuclear stockpilesed, the government had to store the radioactive material in high-security facilities.
Five nuclear startups are negotiating with the government.
The Energy Department said on Tuesday it has selected five nuclear startups to negotiate with the government to get a share of the plutonium, which could potentially be used to power a new generation of nuclear reactors. The Department of Energy previously identified 34 tonnes of plutonium for disposal.
The five startups include Oklo, Standard Nuclear, Shine Technologies, Flib Energy and Exodis Energy.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright was previously on Oklo’s board but resigned when it went into administration and said he had sold his shares. Sam Altman was the board chairman of Oklo following its merger with its acquisition company, AltC; Altman resigned from the post last year.
While plutonium exists in nature, it is usually a byproduct of bombarding non-fissionable uranium with neutrons. Once created, that isotope of plutonium has a half-life of 24,000 years, meaning the government can’t afford to wait for it.
Oklo is developing a reactor that can run on conventional uranium fuel as well as plutonium. The plutonium will help the company fuel its first reactors. Exodis Energy is also developing a reactor that could operate using some plutonium as part of mixed oxide fuel, or MOX, which blends uranium with plutonium. Flib Energy is working toward a reactor that will run on plutonium and other byproducts of fission reactors.
MOX is currently produced in France, and while the US had plans to build it in South Carolina, the Trump administration previously cancelled the project after budget and timeline violations. UK-based Nucleo, one of Oklo’s partners in the project, said it intends to build its own MOX fuel manufacturing facility nearby.
However, not everyone is thrilled with the plan. Since plutonium comes from nuclear weapons, safety concerns are significant. Scott Roecker, vice president of the Nuclear Threat Initiative, said, “Countries have tried this before, and they’ve concluded that as much as it would be nice to use plutonium as fuel, it’s really just a liability and we need to dispose of it permanently.” told the New York Times.
For the startup, the next step is to enter into advanced talks with the government about the safety and transportation of the plutonium.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has warned that a vote for Alberta’s independence from Canada could mirror some of the challenges experienced following the United Kingdom’s Brexit referendum. His comments come amid growing debate over Alberta’s future relationship with the rest of Canada and increasing calls from some groups for greater provincial autonomy.
The remarks have sparked discussion across the country, with supporters and opponents of Alberta independence offering sharply different views on the potential consequences of separation.
Why Carney Drew Comparisons with Brexit
The Carney warns that a vote for Alberta’s independence from Canada could echo the Brexit debate, which centres on concerns about economic uncertainty and long-term political consequences.
Carney argued that major constitutional decisions can have lasting effects that are difficult to predict fully before a vote takes place. He pointed to Brexit as an example of a referendum that produced years of political negotiations, economic adjustments, and public debate after the result was announced.
According to Carney, Albertans should carefully consider the economic and social implications of any move towards independence before making such a significant decision.
The Independence Movement in Alberta
Calls for Alberta independence have existed for decades but have gained attention during periods of political and economic tension. Some supporters argue that Alberta contributes more to the national economy than it receives in return and should have greater control over its resources and policies.
Advocates of independence believe a separate Alberta could make decisions tailored specifically to the province’s interests, particularly regarding energy production and taxation.
However, critics warn that separation could create uncertainty for businesses, investors, and residents.
Economic Questions Remain Central
One of the biggest issues Carney warns about in the vote for Alberta’s independence from Canada could be an echo of the Brexit discussion: the economy.
Experts note that independence would raise important questions about trade, currency, federal transfers, public services, pensions, and international agreements. Businesses would likely seek clarity on how a newly independent Alberta would operate economically and politically.
Supporters of remaining within Canada argue that economic stability and access to national institutions provide significant benefits that could be difficult to replicate after separation.
Political Reactions
Political leaders across Canada have responded to Carney’s comments with mixed reactions. Some have supported his warning, arguing that the experience of Brexit demonstrates the risks associated with major constitutional changes.
Others have criticised the comparison, claiming that Alberta’s situation differs significantly from the UK’s departure from the European Union and should be assessed on its own merits.
While no immediate independence referendum has been scheduled, the issue remains a topic of political discussion in Alberta. Public opinion is divided, and future developments will likely depend on economic conditions, federal-provincial relations, and the broader political landscape.
Observers expect both supporters and opponents of independence to intensify efforts to persuade voters as the conversation continues.
Conclusion
The Carney warns a vote for Alberta’s independence from Canada could be an echo of the Brexitdebate and highlights the complex questions surrounding Alberta’s future. While supporters see independence as an opportunity for greater self-determination, opponents point to potential economic and political uncertainties. As discussions continue, Albertans will face important decisions about the province’s place within Canada and its long-term future.
