Home Blog

Seafood can turn back the clock on ageing, Stanford researchers find

0
Seafood can turn back the clock on ageing, Stanford researchers find

Ageing often makes itself visible in familiar ways, from grey hair and wrinkles to lapses in memory. That has fuelled a longstanding scientific question: could some of those changes eventually be slowed, prevented, or even reversed?

Research involving a group of scientists from Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Stanford University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences points to an intriguing possibility. In experiments with aged mice, researchers found that dietary supplements containing compounds associated with Ascidiacea, commonly known as sea squirts, reversed several signs linked to ageing.

An Unusual Source of Anti-Ageing Compounds

Sea squirts are marine animals that people eat in parts of Asia, including Korea (where they are known as meongge, or 멍게) and Japan (hoya, or ホヤ). They can be eaten raw and contain high levels of compounds called plasmalogens.

Plasmalogens are a type of lipid, or fat molecule, that forms an important part of cell membranes. They occur naturally throughout the human body and are especially abundant in the brain, heart, and immune cells. Their levels tend to decline as people grow older.

Reduced plasmalogen levels have also been observed in several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. That connection has led researchers to investigate whether restoring plasmalogens could help protect the brain from some of the changes associated with ageing.

To explore that possibility, the team added plasmalogens to the diets of aged mice and examined how the supplements affected both their behaviour and their bodies.

The results were striking. The treated mice showed substantial improvements in learning and displayed visible physical changes as well.

Professor Lei Fu, the corresponding author of the study, says, “Our research suggests that plasmalogens may not just stop cognitive decline but may reverse cognitive impairments in the ageing brain. Additionally, aged mice fed with the plasmalogens grow new black hair that is thicker and glossier than aged mice not fed the supplement.”

According to the researchers, the work provides the first detailed look at how plasmalogens may influence the ageing brain.

Seafood can turn back the clock on ageing
Seafood can turn back the clock on ageing

Ageing Mice Show Improved Memory

To measure learning and memory, the scientists used a common laboratory experiment called the Morris water maze. In this test, mice are placed in a pool containing a hidden platform where they can rest.

Because mice generally prefer to escape the water, they gradually learn where the platform is located. After several days of training, younger mice typically remember its position and swim toward it quickly. Older mice often need more time to locate the platform, reflecting the decline in learning and memory that can accompany ageing.

After five days of training, aged mice receiving plasmalogens performed much more like younger animals. They reached the platform significantly faster than aged mice that had not received the supplement.

The researchers then examined the animals’ brains to determine what might explain the improvement.

They found that mice given plasmalogens had more synapses, and these synapses appeared to be in better condition than those in untreated aged mice.

Synapses are the tiny junctions through which nerve cells communicate. They allow signals to pass through neural networks and are essential for learning, memory, and many other brain functions.

Restoring Connections in the Ageing Brain

Synapses are highly adaptable early in life. This ability to change and form new connections, often called neural plasticity, helps the brain learn new information and skills.

With age, however, synapses can become less numerous and less effective. Similar deterioration is also associated with neurodegenerative diseases and can contribute to declining cognitive abilities.

In the experiment, aged mice receiving plasmalogen supplements appeared better able to form new neural connections and learn new tasks than mice eating a normal diet. The findings suggest that increasing dietary plasmalogens may help protect synapses from some forms of age-related deterioration.

The researchers also identified another important difference between the groups: inflammation in the brain was substantially lower among mice receiving plasmalogens.

Inflammation is part of the body’s normal immune response, but chronic or excessive inflammation in the brain can become harmful. As the brain ages, immune activity can become dysregulated, potentially damaging nerve cells and disrupting communication between synapses. Persistent inflammation is also considered an important contributor to several neurodegenerative disorders.

The reduction in inflammation seen in the plasmalogen-treated mice could therefore help explain why they performed better on tests of learning and memory.

Restoring Connections in the Ageing Brain
Restoring Connections in the Ageing Brain

How Plasmalogens Might Work

Scientists do not yet know exactly how dietary plasmalogens produce these effects. Professor Fu outlined several possible mechanisms.

“We found that plasmalogens significantly increase the number of molecules that aid the growth and development of neurones and synapses in the brain. This suggests that plasmalogens can promote neuroregeneration.

“There is also an increasing body of evidence that plasmalogens directly affect the structural properties of synapses. Plasmalogens may increase the fluidity and flexibility of synaptic membranes, affecting the transmission of impulses between neurones.”

Neuroregeneration refers to the repair, renewal, or regrowth of nerve cells and their connections. If plasmalogens support that process, they could potentially help the ageing brain maintain or rebuild some of the neural circuitry needed for memory and learning.

The researchers also believe that the effects may extend beyond what happens directly inside the brain.

Professor Fu points to the gut-brain connection as another possible pathway.

“Some studies have shown that dietary plasmalogens affect the microorganisms in the gut. It has been widely reported that the connection between the organisms in our gut and our brain influences neurodegeneration. It may be the plasmalogen’s effect on this connection that causes the improvements in learning and memory seen in this study.”

The gut contains enormous communities of bacteria and other microorganisms, collectively known as the gut microbiome. Research increasingly suggests that these microbes can influence the brain through immune signals, metabolism, and other biological pathways. Scientists often refer to this two-way communication system as the gut-brain axis.

Could Plasmalogens Eventually Help People?

Professor Fu has such confidence in the findings that he personally takes a plasmalogen supplement every day.

“For the first time, we show that plasmalogen supplements might be a potential intervention strategy for halting neurodegeneration and promoting neuroregeneration.

“The oral intake of plasmalogens could be a feasible therapeutic strategy to improve cognitive function in older people.”

The findings are intriguing, but they come from an animal model. Improvements observed in mice do not necessarily mean that eating sea squirts or taking plasmalogen supplements will reverse ageing in humans. Additional research would be needed to determine whether similar effects occur in people, what doses might be effective, and whether long-term supplementation is safe.

Still, the results raise an unusual possibility. A compound found in an edible marine animal may offer scientists a new way to investigate how ageing affects the brain and whether some of those changes can eventually be reversed.

Burnham promises the public will be the ‘boss’ of the UK’s relationship with the EU.

0

Mr Burnham said he believed the 2016 Brexit referendum was legitimate

Andy Burnham has pledged the “public will be the boss” as he tries to undo Brexit, giving his clearest hint to date of a new referendum on the UK rejoining the EU.

“I will use a key UK-EU summit in Brussels next month to push for a Brexit reset aimed at improving relations with the bloc and perhaps look to rejoin as part of an attempt to get a better deal,” the prime minister said in a statement to parliament.

He warned MPs that “sticking with the status quo is not good enough” and insisted that the “public backs my pragmatic approach.”

Calling on MPs to rethink Brexit to secure a deal with Brussels, Mr Burnham said it would be a “dereliction of duty” to ignore an opportunity to seek a new deal with the EU, insisting the public supported his approach.

And, when asked if he would honour the 2016 referendum outcome, the PM said he would be prepared to “set out options that I think … Britain should consider”.

His intervention comes after a weekend where the European Movement UK published a plan for the UK to rejoin the EU by 2036 at the latest.

Meanwhile, as the prime minister took questions in the Commons, a debate was taking place at the same time in Westminster Hall with MPs, led by Labour’s Folkestone and Hythe’s Tony Vaughan, on a petition calling on the UK to rejoin.

Burnham told the Commons it would be a ‘dereliction of duty’ to ignore an opportunity to seek a new deal with the EU, insisting the public supported his approach
Burnham told the Commons it would be a ‘dereliction of duty’ to ignore an opportunity to seek a new deal with the EU, insisting the public supported his approach (Parliament TV)

During his address, Mr Burnham said he believed the 2016 Brexit referendum was legitimate, despite acknowledging Russian interference, and that he would respect the result. He also gave a strong hint that he will seek to persuade the public to allow him to reverse the decision.

Last month, he told the BBC an in-out referendum on the EU could be part of a future Labour election manifesto.

In response to a question, Mr Burnham said, “I’m also going to lead and be prepared to set out options that I think are options Britain should consider. If she [the questioner] is saying she is content with the status quo, she is in a minority in this country. People know Britain can do better than this. I’m determined to secure better for Britain.”

Confirming the date of the EU-UK summit in Brussels on 20 November, which was postponed because Sir Keir Starmer resigned, Mr Burnham told the Commons he will “work harder over the next five weeks” to strike a deal.

“I believe our chances of doing so will be enhanced by being open to discussion about our relationship with the EU in the longer term,” he said.

The two sides will seek to sign a new post-Brexit food and drink deal, a youth mobility scheme and an agreement on emissions trading to avoid European carbon taxes on British business.

He told MPs that the British public will “be the boss” of the negotiations, saying, “I am clear; the public opinion currently supports a pragmatic approach like the one I am suggesting. If we go into this further phase, we will proceed with care and complete transparency.”

Mr Burnham said the upcoming summit “presents an opportunity to make progress on two crucial issues: boosting UK growth and controlling illegal immigration.”

He said deals on the table for the UK-EU summit could provide a £10 bn-a-year boost to the British economy.

But he acknowledged there could be a row with Brussels over the protectionist “Made in Europe” scheme.

Just before Mr Burnham gave his statement, representatives of British motor manufacturers – including Honda, Jaguar Land Rover and the Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders (SMMT) – joined a forum to discuss the damage done to supply chains in the UK and EU by the EU’s plans for Made in Europe rules.

They called for both sides to agree on closer alignment as a matter of urgency.

Mr Burnham told MPs: “This summit presents an opportunity to make progress on two crucial issues: boosting UK growth and controlling illegal immigration.

“On the table is a trade deal on food and drink products, a deal on emissions trading, progress towards linking our energy systems, a new youth experience scheme and deeper co-operation on immigration.

“The summit will also be an opportunity to raise our concerns about Made in Europe and it is clear to me that there is an opportunity to make progress in all of these areas.

“Together, these deals will add the equivalent of over £10bn per year to the UK economy by 2040, with the potential to add significantly more.”

But Kemi Badenoch accused Mr Burnham of revealing his hand before the UK-EU summit, adding, “This is not how you conduct negotiations.”

The Conservative Party leader said that the prime minister is “not going to get a better deal” and told the Commons, “What has the prime minister chosen to focus on today?” Brexit.

Kemi Badenoch accused Andy Burnham of revealing his hand before the UK-EU summit
Kemi Badenoch accused Andy Burnham of revealing his hand before the UK-EU summit (AFP/Getty)

‘His exact words earlier this year were, “The last thing we should do right now is re-run those arguments.” ‘And yet here he is unpicking the deal this country signed with the EU a decade after the referendum.

“He is not going to get a better deal. The EU are tough negotiators, and it’s not just that they are tough negotiators; he has already revealed his entire negotiating hand. He has just blurted out everything he wants in this statement and I will tell him now, as a former trade secretary, this is not how you conduct negotiations.”

Responding, Mr Burnham said: “She says that, oh, I’ve revealed what I want to do and this isn’t any way to negotiate it. Because the Tories were so good at negotiating deals with our partners, weren’t they?”

The prime minister also said it was “inconceivable” that Russia did not seek to interfere with the Brexit vote.

On The Rest is Politics podcast over the weekend, the prime minister revealed he had asked, on his arrival in No. 10 this summer, whether Moscow had been involved in the vote and was given “the clear answer that yes, there was”.

But on Monday, a Foreign Office minister said Russian attempts to interfere in the Brexit referendum were not successful.

No 10 echoed the comments, saying the government does not believe Russian attempts to interfere with the referendum were successful.

Ukraine claims Russia has attacked its energy infrastructure despite Trump calling for a ceasefire

0
Ukraine claims Russia has attacked its energy infrastructure despite Trump calling for a ceasefire
ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

Russia Continues Energy Attacks Despite the US Ceasefire Announcement

Russia attacks Ukrainian energy infrastructure despite US President Donald Trump’s announcement that Moscow and Kyiv had agreed to stop targeting each other’s energy facilities.

On Sunday, 11 October 2026, Trump declared that an immediate energy ceasefire was in effect. However, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Russian forces continued striking power facilities, including a heating and electricity plant in Kharkiv.

The announcement initially raised hopes that both countries might reduce attacks on essential infrastructure as winter approaches.

However, the Kremlin had not publicly confirmed the agreement, and Ukrainian officials said they were still waiting for details from Washington.

The continued strikes have raised questions about whether an enforceable ceasefire actually exists.

What Did Donald Trump Announce?

On 11 October, Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that Russia and Ukraine had agreed to an immediate halt to attacks on energy infrastructure.

The US president described the arrangement as an energy ceasefire but did not provide details about its duration, monitoring measures or enforcement.

An energy ceasefire would differ from a complete ceasefire because it would focus specifically on power stations, electricity networks, oil refineries and other energy facilities.

Military operations elsewhere could potentially continue.

Trump’s announcement followed growing international concern about rising fuel prices and the economic consequences of the war.

However, Zelenskyy indicated that he had not received any information about a completed agreement before Trump’s announcement.

Ukraine subsequently welcomed the possibility of a ceasefire while emphasising that Russia must also comply

Donald Trump announces proposed Russia Ukraine energy ceasefire
Donald Trump announces proposed Russia Ukraine energy ceasefire

Russian Strikes Hit Power Facilities in Kharkiv and Kyiv

Ukrainian officials reported further attacks on energy facilities following Trump’s statement.

In Kharkiv, Russia reportedly struck a combined heat and power plant, affecting infrastructure essential for electricity and heating.

There were also reports of drone strikes affecting energy facilities in Kyiv, resulting in electricity disruption.

The attacks are especially concerning because Ukraine is preparing for colder weather.

Electricity and district heating systems are vital for hospitals, schools, homes and businesses.

Damage to these facilities can leave entire communities without reliable power and heating.

Zelenskyy said Russia had carried out more than 200 attacks on Ukrainian electricity-generating facilities over the preceding week, alongside 17 strikes on oil and gas infrastructure.

Ukrainian authorities reported these figures, which illustrate the scale of the country’s concerns about continued attacks.

Zelenskyy Says Ukraine Supports a Genuine Energy Ceasefire

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has expressed support for an agreement that would protect energy infrastructure on both sides.

However, he stressed that any arrangement must involve reciprocal commitments.

Ukraine has conducted strikes against Russian oil refineries and other energy facilities as part of its campaign to weaken Russia’s capacity to sustain the war.

Zelenskyy said Ukraine would be prepared to stop attacking Russian refineries if Moscow stopped targeting Ukraine’s electricity system.

He also argued that protecting Ukraine’s power grid must be central to any energy ceasefire.

This distinction matters because a limited agreement focused only on oil refineries would not necessarily protect Ukrainian civilians from electricity and heating outages.

Kyiv wants an arrangement that provides meaningful protection for essential infrastructure rather than a one-sided restriction on its military operations.

Zelenskyy responds to Russia Ukraine energy ceasefire proposal
Zelenskyy responds to Russia Ukraine energy ceasefire proposal

Why Is Russia Targeting Ukraine’s Energy Infrastructure?

Russia has repeatedly attacked Ukraine’s electricity generation and distribution systems since launching its full-scale invasion in February 2022.

Energy infrastructure has become a major target because electricity is essential to everyday life and economic activity.

When damage occurs to power plants and substations, the consequences can extend far beyond temporary power cuts.

Hospitals may need emergency generators, businesses can lose production capacity, and households may struggle to heat their homes.

Ukraine has accused Moscow of deliberately using attacks on energy infrastructure to put pressure on civilians.

Russia has defended its military operations by arguing that some energy facilities support Ukraine’s military capabilities.

Under international humanitarian law, civilian infrastructure is protected from attack unless it qualifies as a military objective. Even attacks against military objectives must comply with the rules of proportionality and precautions to protect civilians.

Why Is an Energy Ceasefire Important Before Winter?

Winter presents particular challenges for Ukraine because millions of people depend on electricity and district heating to survive freezing temperatures.

Repeated attacks have already placed pressure on Ukraine’s energy network.

A genuine energy ceasefire could provide time for engineers to repair damaged facilities, restore electricity supplies and strengthen infrastructure before colder weather arrives.

It could also reduce the risk of prolonged blackouts that affect hospitals, schools and residential buildings.

However, the effectiveness of any agreement would depend on both sides respecting its terms.

Without monitoring arrangements or clear commitments, attacks could continue despite diplomatic announcements.

How Has Europe Responded to Trump’s Ceasefire Claim?

European leaders have reacted cautiously to the announcement.

European Union foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas questioned whether Russia was genuinely prepared to respect an energy ceasefire.

Ukraine’s European partners have emphasised that any agreement must lead to measurable improvements in security and civilian protection.

The continued attacks have reinforced concerns that diplomatic announcements alone cannot guarantee a reduction in violence.

European governments also remain concerned about the wider consequences of the war, including energy security, economic disruption and regional stability.

Could the Energy Ceasefire Lead to Peace Talks?

An effective energy ceasefire could provide an opportunity for further diplomatic discussions.

A limited agreement protecting electricity and fuel infrastructure would not end the war, but it could establish a basis for negotiations on other issues.

However, significant disagreements remain between Russia and Ukraine over territory, security guarantees and the conditions for ending hostilities.

Ukraine has repeatedly called for international security guarantees to prevent renewed attacks.

Russia continues to pursue its territorial and security demands.

These differences mean that a limited energy agreement should not be confused with a comprehensive peace settlement.

The immediate question is whether Washington can secure clear commitments from Moscow and Kyiv and establish a credible system for monitoring compliance.

What Happens Next in the Russia-Ukraine War?

The coming days will be important for determining whether Trump’s proposed energy ceasefire can become a functioning agreement.

Several developments deserve close attention:

  • Whether the Kremlin formally confirms or rejects the proposed ceasefire.
  • Whether Russian attacks on Ukrainian electricity facilities decrease.
  • Whether Ukraine suspends strikes against Russian oil refineries.
  • Whether the United States provides further details about the agreement is also a key question.
  • Whether international mediators establish a mechanism for monitoring compliance.

For Ukrainian civilians, the immediate concern remains the safety and reliability of electricity and heating supplies.

Even if diplomatic negotiations continue, engineers and emergency workers must address the damage the conflict has already caused.

Conclusion

The latest Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure have raised serious doubts about President Donald Trump’s announcement of an immediate energy ceasefire.

Although Ukraine has expressed its willingness to support a reciprocal agreement, Moscow had not confirmed the arrangement as of the reporting reviewed on 12 October.

Strikes affecting power facilities in Kharkiv and Kyiv demonstrate the continuing dangers facing Ukraine’s electricity system.

As winter approaches, protecting essential infrastructure is becoming increasingly important for millions of civilians.

A meaningful ceasefire would require clear commitments from both countries, reliable monitoring and an end to attacks on the facilities covered by the agreement.

Until those conditions are established, Ukraine’s energy security remains uncertain.

Frequently Asked Questions

Has Russia agreed to stop attacking Ukraine’s energy infrastructure?

President Trump announced an agreement on 11 October 2026, but Russia had not publicly confirmed it in the latest reports reviewed.

Did Russia attack Ukraine after Trump’s ceasefire announcement?

Yes. Ukrainian officials reported further strikes on energy facilities, including a power plant in Kharkiv, following the announcement.

Does Ukraine support an energy ceasefire?

Yes. President Zelenskyy has expressed support for a reciprocal agreement under which Russia stops attacking Ukrainian energy infrastructure and Ukraine stops targeting Russian energy facilities.

Why are Ukrainian power plants being attacked?

Energy infrastructure is important to civilian life, industry and military operations. Russia has repeatedly targeted parts of Ukraine’s energy network during the war.

Could an energy ceasefire end the Russia-Ukraine war?

Not by itself. It would be a limited agreement addressing attacks on energy facilities, rather than a comprehensive settlement of the conflict.

Liverpool 0–3 Manchester City: Haaland, Doku and Cherki Fire City to Stunning Anfield Victory

0
Liverpool 0–3 Manchester City: Haaland, Doku and Cherki Fire City to Stunning Anfield Victory

Manchester City beat Liverpool 3–0 at Anfield on Sunday, 11 October 2026, producing a clinical second-half performance to maintain their perfect start to the Premier League season.

Goals from Erling Haaland, Jeremy Doku and Rayan Cherki secured all three points for Enzo Maresca’s side after Liverpool midfielder Ryan Gravenberch was sent off in the 62nd minute.

The result extended City’s winning run to six league matches and moved them three points clear of Arsenal at the top of the table.

For Liverpool, it was a disappointing afternoon as Andoni Iraola’s team suffered their first Premier League defeat of the campaign.

Manchester City Overcome Hostile Anfield Atmosphere

Manchester City arrived at Anfield facing enormous pressure following an independent commission’s decision concerning alleged breaches of Premier League financial regulations.

City have appealed the commission’s findings and continue to deny any wrongdoing.

Liverpool supporters made their feelings clear throughout the match, creating an intense atmosphere with loud chants directed at the visiting team.

However, City remained composed despite the pressure.

Liverpool started strongly, pressing the visitors and attempting to control the tempo.

The home side showed determination during the opening 45 minutes, limiting City’s attacking opportunities and preventing Haaland from finding space inside the penalty area.

The first half ended goalless, leaving the match finely balanced.

Ryan Gravenberch Red Card Changes the Match

The match changed in the 62nd minute.

Liverpool midfielder Ryan Gravenberch received a second yellow card for a challenge on Jeremy Doku.

The referee’s decision reduced Liverpool to ten players and immediately changed the balance of the game.

Before the dismissal, Liverpool had competed effectively against the league leaders.

However, losing a central midfielder created additional space for City’s attacking players.

Liverpool manager Andoni Iraola later questioned the referee’s decision, arguing that Gravenberch’s earlier booking had been harsh.

The sending-off became one of the most discussed incidents of the match.

Ryan Gravenberch sent off against Manchester City
Ryan Gravenberch sent off against Manchester City

Erling Haaland Opens the Scoring in the 65th Minute

Manchester City needed only three minutes to take advantage of their extra player.

In the 65th minute, Jeremy Doku attacked down the left and drove into Liverpool’s penalty area.

His attempted shot was blocked, but the ball fell to Erling Haaland.

The Norwegian striker reacted quickly and fired a powerful left-footed finish beyond Liverpool goalkeeper Alisson.

It was an important goal for Haaland, who had missed an earlier opportunity.

The striker celebrated with City’s travelling supporters as the visitors took control of the match.

Liverpool suddenly faced a difficult challenge: finding an equaliser while playing with ten men against one of the Premier League’s strongest attacking teams.

Jeremy Doku Scores Spectacular Second Goal

Only three minutes after Haaland’s opener, Manchester City doubled their advantage.

Jeremy Doku, who had come off the bench earlier in the second half, produced a brilliant individual effort.

The Belgian winger moved inside from the left, created space outside the penalty area and curled a superb shot into the far corner.

Alisson had little chance of stopping the strike.

Doku’s goal was a major moment in the match because it gave City a two-goal advantage and left Liverpool with an increasingly difficult task.

His pace, close control and direct attacking approach caused problems for Liverpool’s defence.

The winger’s introduction proved particularly influential, helping City turn a competitive contest into a convincing victory.

Jeremy Doku scores for Manchester City against Liverpool
Jeremy Doku scores for Manchester City against Liverpool

Rayan Cherki Completes the Victory

Manchester City added their third goal in the 78th minute.

Rayan Cherki combined with Josko Gvardiol before moving into the penalty area and finishing the move.

The goal completed an impressive attacking display from the visitors.

By this stage, Liverpool were struggling to contain City’s movement and creativity.

The home supporters had watched their team compete strongly for more than an hour, but the red card and City’s clinical finishing changed the match completely.

Cherki’s goal confirmed that all three points would be heading back to Manchester.

Enzo Maresca Praises Manchester City’s Mental Strength

Manchester City manager Enzo Maresca praised his players for remaining focused despite the difficult atmosphere.

The city had entered the match under intense scrutiny because of the club’s ongoing financial-rules case.

Maresca emphasised the importance of focusing on performances rather than letting outside criticism distract the squad.

The manager also recognised that his team had faced challenges in the opening stages.

However, City’s second-half improvement and ability to capitalise on Liverpool’s dismissal demonstrated their attacking quality.

The victory was particularly significant because it maintained the team’s perfect Premier League record.

Liverpool Manager Andoni Iraola Questions Referee’s Decision

Liverpool manager Andoni Iraola expressed frustration at the red card shown to Ryan Gravenberch.

The Spanish coach believed his team had performed well before the dismissal and argued that the referee’s decisions affected the contest.

Liverpool had managed to restrict City for much of the opening hour.

However, the numerical disadvantage made it extremely difficult to defend against City’s attacking players.

Iraola acknowledged that Manchester City were the stronger team after the sending-off.

The result leaves Liverpool with questions about their response to setbacks and their ability to compete against the league’s leading sides.

What Does the Result Mean for the Premier League Table?

Manchester City’s victory strengthened their position at the top of the Premier League.

After six matches, City had collected 18 points from a possible 18.

The result moved them three points clear of Arsenal and maintained their perfect start under Enzo Maresca.

For Liverpool, the defeat dropped them to ninth place.

Although it is still early in the campaign, a defeat at home to a major rival is a setback.

City will hope to maintain their momentum, while Liverpool must recover quickly to avoid dropping any more points.

What Can Liverpool Learn From the Defeat?

Despite the disappointing scoreline, Liverpool can take some encouragement from their performance before the red card.

For more than an hour, they competed strongly against Manchester City.

Their pressing, midfield organisation and defensive effort helped keep the match goalless.

However, the dismissal exposed the difficulty of playing against City’s attacking quality with ten men.

Liverpool will need to improve their discipline and their ability to reorganise after unexpected setbacks.

The coaching staff will also examine how the team defended during the period when City scored three goals in just 13 minutes.

Manchester City Show Their Attacking Quality

The victory demonstrated the variety of attacking options available to Manchester City.

Haaland remains a powerful presence inside the penalty area.

Doku provides pace, dribbling ability and the confidence to attack defenders directly.

Cherki adds technical quality, movement and creativity.

Together, these players give City several different ways to create scoring opportunities.

The second-half performance also showed how quickly City can punish opponents when space becomes available.

Liverpool’s red card undoubtedly influenced the match, but City still needed to take their chances.

They did so with impressive efficiency.

Rayan Cherki celebrates Manchester City's third goal at Anfield
Rayan Cherki celebrates Manchester City’s third goal at Anfield

Conclusion

Ryan Gravenberch’s second-half dismissal transformed the Liverpool 0–3 Manchester City match.

Liverpool competed strongly during the opening hour, but Manchester City took control after the midfielder was sent off.

Erling Haaland opened the scoring in the 65th minute before Jeremy Doku produced a superb second goal just three minutes later.

Rayan Cherki completed the victory in the 78th minute.

For Manchester City, the result maintained their perfect Premier League start and strengthened their position at the top of the table.

For Liverpool, the defeat served as a reminder of the importance of discipline and the need to respond effectively to difficult situations.

The result will be remembered for City’s attacking quality, Doku’s outstanding contribution and the controversial red card that changed the direction of the match.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won Liverpool vs Manchester City on 11 October 2026?

Manchester City defeated Liverpool 3–0 at Anfield.

Who scored Manchester City’s goals?

Erling Haaland scored in the 65th minute, Jeremy Doku in the 68th minute and Rayan Cherki in the 78th minute.

Why did Liverpool receive a red card?

Ryan Gravenberch was sent off in the 62nd minute after receiving a second yellow card for a challenge on Jeremy Doku.

Who is Manchester City’s manager?

Enzo Maresca was Manchester City’s manager for the match.

Who is Liverpool’s manager?

Andoni Iraola was Liverpool’s manager for the match.

Where are Manchester City in the Premier League table?

Following the victory, City were top with 18 points from six matches, three points ahead of Arsenal.

Deadly Houthi Attacks Hit Saudi Arabia’s Riyadh Airport: Death Toll Rises as Regional Tensions Escalate

0
Deadly Houthi Attacks Hit Saudi Arabia’s Riyadh Airport: Death Toll Rises as Regional Tensions Escalate

Houthi attacks on Riyadh airport have left at least 14 people dead across Saturday and Sunday, with more than 300 others injured, according to Saudi authorities and international news reports.

The strikes targeted King Khalid International Airport in Saudi Arabia’s capital, causing significant disruption to flights and raising concerns about the safety of civilian aviation.

The attacks come amid escalating fighting between Saudi Arabia and Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi movement, which has launched repeated missile and drone strikes against Saudi infrastructure.

Saudi authorities have condemned the attacks and promised a response, while international governments have expressed concern about the possibility of a wider regional conflict.

What Happened at Riyadh Airport?

On Saturday, 10 October 2026, a missile struck King Khalid International Airport, killing 12 people and injuring 309, according to Saudi Arabia’s General Authority of Civil Aviation.

The victims included Saudi citizens and foreign nationals, reflecting the airport’s importance as a major international transport hub.

Saudi authorities reported that several injured people were in critical condition and were receiving hospital treatment.

The attack caused damage to airport facilities and forced authorities to suspend operations while emergency teams assessed the situation.

On Sunday, 11 October, another projectile struck the airport, killing a Pakistani resident and injuring 11 people.

Indian officials also confirmed that an Indian national died from injuries sustained in Saturday’s attack, bringing the reported toll from that strike to 13.

The attacks have raised serious questions about aviation security and the potential consequences of further strikes.

Who Is Responsible for the Attacks?

Yemen’s Houthi movement has claimed responsibility for attacks targeting Saudi airports.

The group, which controls significant parts of Yemen, has used missiles and drones in its confrontation with Saudi Arabia and other regional opponents.

The Houthis say their operations are connected to Saudi military activities in Yemen.

Saudi Arabia, however, has condemned attacks on civilian infrastructure and accused the group of endangering innocent people.

The Saudi-led coalition has described the strikes as violations of international humanitarian law and warned that it will take measures to protect the kingdom.

The latest attacks represent another escalation in a conflict that has already caused extensive suffering in Yemen and heightened tensions throughout the Middle East.

Why Is King Khalid International Airport Important?

King Khalid International Airport is one of the most important aviation centres in Saudi Arabia.

Located in Riyadh, it serves millions of passengers and connects the Saudi capital with destinations across the Middle East, Europe, Asia and other parts of the world.

The airport plays a central role in business travel, tourism and international connections.

Any prolonged disruption can therefore affect thousands of travellers, airlines and businesses.

The attacks are particularly concerning because civilian airports are essential infrastructure used by people travelling for work, family visits, religious purposes and other activities.

Damage to terminals, aircraft or surrounding facilities can create serious safety risks even when airport authorities activate emergency procedures.

King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh Saudi Arabia
King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh Saudi Arabia

Flights Cancelled as Airlines Review Security

The attacks have caused major disruption to commercial aviation.

Several airlines suspended or cancelled services to Riyadh following the missile strikes.

Passengers have been advised to contact their airlines before travelling and to monitor official airport announcements.

Saudi aviation authorities have been conducting safety inspections and assessing damage to airport facilities.

The situation remains uncertain because further attacks could affect decisions about reopening terminals and resuming normal operations.

International travellers should not assume that a scheduled flight will operate until the airline confirms its status.

Saudi Arabia Responds to the Houthi Attacks

Saudi Arabia has strongly condemned the attacks and indicated that it intends to respond.

The Saudi-led coalition has already been conducting military operations against Houthi positions in Yemen.

Saudi officials argue that protecting civilian infrastructure and national security is essential.

However, further military action also raises concerns about escalation and the possibility of additional civilian casualties in Yemen.

The conflict has already created serious humanitarian problems, including displacement, economic disruption and pressure on essential services.

International observers are watching whether military action will intensify or whether diplomatic negotiations can reduce tensions.

Yemen's Houthi movement amid Saudi Arabia conflict
Yemen’s Houthi movement amid Saudi Arabia conflict

Could the United States Become Involved?

The attacks have also attracted attention in Washington.

US President Donald Trump has indicated that he is considering whether American forces should become more directly involved in operations against the Houthis.

The United States has longstanding security relationships with Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries.

However, direct American military involvement could increase the scale of the conflict.

Washington must also consider the consequences for regional stability, international shipping and relations with Iran.

At the time of writing, discussion about possible additional US military involvement should not be confused with confirmation that a new intervention has begun.

What Does This Conflict Mean for Global Oil Prices?

Saudi Arabia is one of the world’s largest oil producers, making security developments in the kingdom important to international energy markets.

The attacks have increased concerns about the vulnerability of airports, energy facilities and transport networks.

The Houthis have also threatened shipping routes connected to the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandeb Strait.

These routes are important for international trade and energy transportation.

If commercial shipping faces additional restrictions, transport expenses and insurance premiums could increase.

However, oil prices depend on many factors, including global demand, production levels, available supplies and the duration of any disruption.

A single attack does not automatically determine the direction of energy markets.

Saudi Arabia oil facilities and Middle East energy security
Saudi Arabia oil facilities and Middle East energy security

International Reaction to the Riyadh Airport Attacks

The attacks have drawn condemnation from several governments.

Turkey, Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia issued a joint statement criticising the strikes and calling for an end to attacks on civilian infrastructure.

The governments expressed support for Saudi Arabia’s security and its right to protect its territory.

International concern has also focused on the safety of foreign nationals working and travelling in the kingdom.

Diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation remain important, particularly because the Saudi-Houthi conflict is closely connected to wider tensions involving Iran and the United States.

What Happens Next?

The immediate priorities are medical care for the injured, airport safety inspections and the restoration of secure flight operations.

Saudi authorities are also reviewing the security situation, as the possibility of additional missile or drone attacks remains a concern.

Airlines will need to assess whether operations can resume safely.

Meanwhile, international governments are monitoring the conflict and considering diplomatic and security responses.

The coming days will be important in determining whether the attacks lead to further military escalation or renewed efforts to reduce hostilities.

Conclusion

The Houthi attacks on Riyadh airport have caused significant loss of life, injured hundreds of people and disrupted one of Saudi Arabia’s most important transport hubs.

The strikes on 10 and 11 October demonstrate how quickly regional conflicts can affect civilian infrastructure and international travel.

Saudi Arabia has promised to protect its security, while the Houthis continue to threaten further operations.

The situation also raises wider concerns about Yemen, Iran, international shipping and global energy supplies.

For now, the main priorities remain protecting civilians, treating the injured, restoring safe airport operations and preventing further escalation.

As the situation develops, accurate casualty figures, official aviation announcements and verified diplomatic statements will be essential for understanding what happens next.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many people were killed in the Riyadh airport attacks?

Reports available on 12 October indicate at least 14 deaths across the attacks on Saturday and Sunday, including a person who later died from injuries sustained on Saturday.

Who carried out the attacks?

Yemen’s Houthi movement claimed responsibility for strikes targeting Saudi airport facilities.

Is Riyadh Airport open?

Airport operations have been severely disrupted. Travellers should check directly with airlines and Saudi aviation authorities for the latest operational status.

Why are the Houthis attacking Saudi Arabia?

The continuing conflict involving the Houthis, Saudi Arabia, and other regional actors, including disagreements over military operations in Yemen, connects the attacks.

Could the attacks affect oil prices?

Further disruption to regional infrastructure and shipping routes could influence energy markets, although price movements depend on several economic and geopolitical factors.

National March for Palestine: What time is the London protest today and what is the route?

0

Pro-Palestine protesters are marching through central London today to mark three years since the start of the war in Gaza.

The National March for Palestine, organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, is taking place on Saturday, October 10.

Organisers are calling for an immediate end to military action in Gaza, a complete halt to UK arms exports to Israel and the introduction of sanctions.

Coaches are being organised from cities across the UK, including Bristol, Manchester and Coventry, to bring demonstrators to central London.

LONDON, ENGLAND – JANUARY 31: Protesters march along Whitehall during a national march for Palestine on January 31.

The National March for Palestine, organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign
Israeli airstrikes killed at least five Palestinians in Gaza on Saturday

When will the protest take place?

The protest will take place on Saturday, October 10, beginning at midday and finishing at 5pm.

Protesters will gather at Victoria Embankment, with the Trade Union Bloc assembling near Cleopatra’s Needle.

The procession will then make its way through central London before concluding with a rally in Whitehall.

What route will protesters take?

Similar to previous marches, protesters will begin assembling at noon near Northumberland Avenue on the Embankment.

The march will make its way from the Embankment towards Westminster Bridge, along the South Bank to Waterloo Bridge and the Strand, before ending with a rally in Whitehall.

A counter-protest by Stop the Hate is also expected. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

A map of the route protesters will take on Saturday

National March for Palestine

Has the Metropolitan Police imposed any restrictions on the march?

The Metropolitan Police has announced that it will impose conditions relating to the timing, route and assembly points for Saturday’s march.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner James Harman said several hundred officers would be deployed, with specific legal conditions under the Public Order Act due to be communicated ahead of the weekend.

“The policing presence on the day is expected to be significant, with several hundred officers involved in ensuring disruption is kept to a minimum and any crime or disorder is dealt with swiftly and robustly,” he said.

Since October 2023, the groups that make up the Palestine Coalition have organised 35 large protests. Those taking part all have their own varied motives and allegiances. The majority of attendees participate peacefully and lawfully, but a small minority has faced arrests at these protests for racially and religiously aggravated public order offences, for stirring up racial hatred, and for supporting terrorist organisations.

The march, which starts at midday, must travel via Westminster Bridge, York Road, Waterloo Bridge and the Strand to Whitehall.

The rally at Whitehall must end by 6.30pm, police say. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

Protesters must follow the route as set out by Met Police.

Protesters must remain in designated areas before the procession begins and follow an agreed route through central London, including Victoria Embankment, Westminster Bridge, York Road, Waterloo Bridge, Strand and Whitehall.

Marchers are prohibited from entering a designated emergency access lane on Westminster Bridge and Westminster Bridge Road.

Speeches and music must end by 5.30pm, with the assembly required to disperse by 6.30pm. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

The Section 60AA designated area map

Met Police

Police have also been given powers under Section 60AA, allowing officers to require the removal of face coverings where they reasonably believe they are being worn to conceal someone’s identity.

What has the Met Police said about chants and banners?

The Met has also reiterated its approach to chants and wording on banners that officers believe could incite hatred or indicate support for terrorism or other forms of extremism.

“We have arrested and charged individuals for calling for an intifada at protests, with those cases working their way through the courts,” Mr Harman added. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

Anyone attending the rally must remain in the shaded area.

Met Police

“Our officers will take firm action when they see or hear antisemitism, anti-Muslim abuse, incitement to violence, or language that clearly points to support for terrorists or proscribed groups, for example, Palestine Action.

“We will arrest for those offences when we see them at protests and marches in the coming week. We will investigate post-event where necessary.

“And specialist investigators will work at pace to present the cases to the Crown Prosecution Service to ensure those responsible are swiftly put before the courts.”

Is there a counter-protest?

A pro-Israel Stop the Hate demonstration is also planned nearby, starting at 11am.

The Metropolitan Police have also imposed conditions on that protest that will take place outside New Scotland Yard on Victoria Embankment.

The force has also imposed conditions on the demonstration, “to minimise the risk of serious disruption.”

The demonstrators must remain within a designated area outside the Met’s headquarters, with the assembly concluding at 2.30pm.

Middle East News Today: Gaza Strikes, Saudi Airport Attacks and Rising Regional Tensions

0
Middle East News Today

The latest Middle East news is dominated by renewed violence in Gaza, missile attacks targeting Saudi Arabia, tensions involving Iran-backed groups, and diplomatic developments in Lebanon.

Here are the major developments reported today, with background and explanations suitable for your news website.

1. Israeli strikes kill at least five Palestinians in Gaza.

Israeli airstrikes killed at least five Palestinians in Gaza on Saturday, according to medical officials cited by Reuters.

Four people were reported killed near Panda Mall in Gaza City, while another person died in the Tuffah neighbourhood.

The Israeli military said it had targeted militants. Israel accuses Hamas of rebuilding its military capabilities and violating the ceasefire, while Hamas denies those allegations and accuses Israel of undermining the agreement.

The violence comes one year after a US-brokered ceasefire intended to bring an end to the war.

2. Saudi Arabia faces renewed Houthi attacks on Riyadh airport.

مطارات المملكة.. مطار الملك خالد الدولي يتصدر الأداء في نوفمبر 2024 - أريبيان بزنس

Saudi Arabia is facing a serious security challenge after further attacks on King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh.

The Associated Press reported that attacks claimed by Yemen’s Houthi movement killed three Saudi citizens, including an airline pilot, earlier in the week. Further strikes have damaged aircraft, injured people and disrupted international flights.

US President Donald Trump said he was considering whether American forces should join Saudi military operations against the Houthis.

Saudi Arabia has launched retaliatory attacks on Houthi positions in Yemen. The conflict also threatens shipping routes near the Red Sea and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

3. Gaza ceasefire faces growing uncertainty one year later

Israeli strikes kill at least five Palestinians in Gaza.
Israeli strikes kill at least five Palestinians in Gaza.

The October 2025 Gaza ceasefire has not delivered all the changes originally promised.

According to an Associated Press assessment published today, the agreement helped secure the release of hostages and increased humanitarian access, but key provisions remain unfulfilled.

Disagreements continue over Hamas disarmament, Israeli military control, Palestinian governance and reconstruction.

Large parts of Gaza remain devastated, and well over two million Palestinians continue to face severe humanitarian difficulties.

4. Nearly two million people in Gaza urgently need shelter.

PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-CONFLICT-GAZA
Gaza urgently need shelter.

The United Nations has warned that almost the entire population of Gaza needs emergency shelter assistance ahead of winter.

The International Organization for Migration said nearly two million people require support, but humanitarian organisations have met only about 17% of the need for winter shelter supplies.

The agency warned that heavy rainfall associated with El Niño could cause flooding in areas where drainage systems have been severely damaged.

More than 3,600 buildings have been identified as dangerous or at risk of collapse.

The UN says restrictions on supplies entering Gaza are making it difficult to prepare for winter. Israel cites security concerns regarding some restricted materials.

5. Lebanon welcomes the US decision to lift the decades-long flight ban.

Lebanon has welcomed President Donald Trump’s decision to remove restrictions on direct flights between Lebanon and the United States.

The restrictions were introduced in 1985 following the hijacking of TWA Flight 847.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun described the decision as a sign of American confidence in improvements to aviation security.

The announcement represents a significant diplomatic development as Lebanon continues dealing with the economic and security consequences of its conflict with Israel.

6. Iran reportedly provides $200 million to Hezbollah.

Reuters reported on 7 October that Hezbollah had received approximately $200 million from Iran to support Lebanese families displaced by conflict with Israel.

Sources familiar with the arrangements said the money would assist around 50,000 families.

The US State Department disputed the reported funding.

The development highlights continuing disagreements over Iran’s regional influence and the challenges facing Lebanon’s reconstruction.

7. Palestinian elections postponed until September 2027

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has postponed legislative and presidential elections until September 2027, according to the Associated Press.

The decision comes amid disagreements between Palestinian factions and concerns about the organisation of elections in Gaza and East Jerusalem.

Supporters of postponement argue that political and security conditions are unsuitable for voting.

Critics say another delay risks weakening public confidence in Palestinian political institutions.

What to watch next in the Middle East

The region faces several interconnected challenges. Further violence in Gaza could undermine efforts to implement the ceasefire, while continued Houthi attacks could threaten Saudi infrastructure, as well as international aviation and shipping.

Humanitarian organisations are increasingly concerned about Gaza’s approaching winter, as shelter shortages and damaged infrastructure put displaced families at risk.

Meanwhile, diplomatic discussions involving Lebanon, Iran, Israel and the United States remain important to regional security.

Conclusion

The latest Middle East news on 10 October 2026 shows that the region continues to face serious military, humanitarian and diplomatic challenges.

From renewed Israeli strikes in Gaza to attacks on Saudi Arabia and efforts to rebuild diplomatic relationships, developments across the region are closely connected.

The coming weeks will be important for ceasefire negotiations, humanitarian assistance, international aviation and regional security

Gwyneth Paltrow’s mini-me daughter Apple Martin keeps her philanthropist boyfriend Moshe Levi close as they enjoy a romantic walk

0
Gwyneth Paltrow’s mini-me daughter Apple Martin keeps her philanthropist boyfriend Moshe Levi close as they enjoy a romantic walk

Gwyneth Paltrow’s mini-me, daughter Apple Martin, certainly seems to be enjoying an autumnal romance.

On Tuesday, the 22-year-old model enjoyed an intimate stroll with her boyfriend, Moshe Levi, in The Hamptons, walking hip-to-hip.

Last month, the Daily Mail revealed that Apple is dating Levi, who is a former athlete and an international philanthropist.

The two walked very close to one another as the daughter of Coldplay frontman Chris Martin looked casually cool in an oversized navy knit sweater over light blue jeans and black leather flat shoes.

Apple looked a dead ringer for her A-list mother, with her blonde locks in a messy bun and her natural looks shining through with complementary make-up.

Her boyfriend donned all black, including a sweater, trousers and leather loafers.

On Tuesday, Gwyneth Paltrow’s mini-me daughter, Apple Martin, and her boyfriend, Moshe Levi, enjoyed an intimate stroll in The Hamptons, walking hip-to-hip.

Martin and Levi both went to the prestigious college Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, where they each graduated. Vanderbilt is one of the most elite colleges in the country, with an acceptance rate of just 5.3%.

Levi appears to be a year older than Apple, having completed his undergraduate programme in April 2025, with a major in economics and business.

Apple just finished her schooling in May, earning a bachelor’s degree in law, history and society.

The two have had a relationship for at least a year, as a photo of them together at the beach in The Hamptons in August 2025 shows.

Levi attended Abingdon, England, boarding school, Radley College, where he played competitive football (soccer in America) and cricket.

In 2019, he and his family, who hail from Peru, launched a nonprofit organisation called MOSHA, which provides underprivileged children in Peru with better educational opportunities.

Levi has also proven himself to be quite the polyglot, as he also speaks four languages: English, Spanish, French and Italian.

Apple sent tongues wagging in May. At the time, the college grad took to her Instagram Stories to post a photo of herself cosying up to a mystery man.

The two walked very close to one another as the daughter of Coldplay frontman Chris Martin looked casual cool in an oversized knit navy sweater over light blue jeans and black leather flat shoes

The two walked very close to one another as the daughter of Coldplay frontman Chris Martin looked casual and cool in an oversized navy knit sweater over light blue jeans and black flat leather shoes.

Then in May, the college grad took to her Instagram Stories to post a photo of herself cozying up to a mystery man which seemed to be Levi

Then, in May, the college grad took to her Instagram Stories to post a photo of herself cosying up to a mystery man who appeared to be Levi.

She was pictured inside a pub as her dark-haired companion draped his arm around her.

The nascent actress gave no clue as to who the man was, as she did not caption the snap or tag another account.

The Instagram Story came less than two weeks after her graduation from the elite college, where a handsome dark-haired hunk was seen walking behind her and her famous mom, Paltrow, on commencement day. It is unclear whether he is the same man as in her Instagram post and on her most recent outing. 

Apple has never publicly confirmed any romantic relationships, but she has been linked to a few men.

In late 2024, Count Leo Henckel von Donnersmarck served as Apple’s ‘cavalier’ for her debut at the prestigious Le Bal des Débutantes in Paris.

Her mother also said last year that Apple had a crush on actor Jacob Elordi; however, the Frankenstein actor is now dating Kendall Jenner.

The budding actress has already been focusing on her post-college career.

Apple made her high-profile runway debut for Chloé at Paris Fashion Week last Thursday.

The English-American socialite looked just like the Goop founder and actress as she made her big entrance wearing an oversized broderie anglaise white dress.

This summer, Apple was unveiled as the face of the brand’s Chloé à la Plage campaign, through the lens of legendary photographer David Sims.

Apple, who has already modelled for Self-Portrait and The Gap, posed in white boho-style clothing on a beach.

She was draped in airy white separates and even more broderie anglaise details just days after her graduation.

Apple made her high-profile runway debut for Chloé at Paris Fashion Week last week on Thursday.

The English-American socialite looked just like the Goop founder and actress as she made her big entrance wearing an oversized broderie anglaise white dress

The English-American socialite looked just like the Goop founder and actress as she made her big entrance wearing an oversized broderie anglaise white dress.

Just like her mother, (pictured above) Apple has already secured a top Hollywood agent at powerhouse agency CAA, and has detailed her dreams of becoming an actress

Just like her mother (pictured above), Apple has already secured a top Hollywood agent at powerhouse agency CAA and has detailed her dreams of becoming an actress

This summer, Apple was unveiled as the face of the brand's Chloé à la Plage campaign, through the lens of legendary photographer David Sims

This summer, Apple was unveiled as the face of the brand’s Chloé à la Plage campaign, through the lens of legendary photographer David Sims.

Apple said back in May, ‘What an absolute honour it is to get to work with Chloé. I have never seen such ethereal pieces.

‘I cannot fathom how incredibly beautiful this collection is and the fact that I was able to shoot in them makes me feel more than words can express!’ ”Thank you for this opportunity.’

And just like her mother, Apple has already secured a top Hollywood agent at powerhouse agency CAA and has detailed her dreams of becoming an actress.

Though she has pursued theatre as a member of the Vanderbilt Original Cast and has directed student productions, Apple was not a drama major.

Last year, Apple told Interview Magazine how she loves theatre ‘more than anything.’

‘I would love to do theatre because I adore it so much. I’ve obviously never done film before, but I’ve been trying to get involved in student films. I was born a theatre kid.’

‘I don’t want to be a singer. I like musical theatre, but getting onstage by yourself to sing is so terrifying. I love dancing and I love acting. My dream is to act.’

Source link

Royal Parks Half Marathon 2026: Route map, road closures, best places to watch and nearest stations

0

The event was first launched in 2008 and bills itself as the first major half marathon through London and the only one to travel through the Royal Parks.

It was set up by The Royal Parks charity as an annual fundraising initiative to help conserve and enhance London’s Royal Parks while enabling charities of all sizes to be involved in a major challenge event.

Two sections of the route pass along The Mall.

This year’s event comes as a record 1.33 million people entered the London Marathon 2027 ballot, showing a growing popularity for mass-participation running events in the capital.

The event has raised over £80 million for more than 1,900 UK charities. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

Everything you need to know about the Oysho Royal Parks Half Marathon 2026

What is the Oysho Royal Parks Half Marathon route?

The 13.1-mile Oysho Royal Parks Half Marathon route takes in many of the capital’s world-famous landmarks. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

The full Oysho Royal Parks Half Marathon route

Starting in Hyde Park and finishing in Kensington Gardens, more than 18,000 runners will pass Horse Guards Parade with views of the London Eye, run along The Mall twice, and pass both Kensington Palace and Buckingham Palace.

Although there are some gentle undulations, it is a generally flat course, making it a good option for both beginners and experienced runners attempting to set personal best times.

Participants will cross the finish line in front of two iconic London landmarks – the Albert Memorial and the Royal Albert Hall. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

The finish line takes in both the Albert Memorial and the Royal Albert Hall.

The event village in Hyde Park is a short walk from the finish line.

What time is the Oysho Royal Parks Half Marathon?

The Oysho Royal Parks Half Marathon officially kicks off at 8.45am.

The Event Village and Baggage Tent will be open from 7.30am, with wave loading opening from 8.05am.

Participants have until 2pm to complete the race, with the Event Village closing by 4pm.

How to get to the Oysho Royal Parks Half Marathon?

Due to local road closures, public transport is your best bet to reach the event – whether you’re a spectator or a participant.

Many Tube stations are within walking distance from the start and finish lines, including Hyde Park Corner, Green Park, Knightsbridge, South Kensington, Victoria, Marble Arch, and Lancaster Gate.

Directions from each nearby station can be seen on the Oysho Royal Parks Half Marathon YouTube page

Runners and spectators have been advised that there are planned engineering works on Race Day on the Circle line from Edgware Road to Aldgate via Victoria and on the District line from Tower Hill and Edgware Road to Ealing Broadway, Kensington (Olympia), Richmond and Wimbledon.

What are the best places to watch the race?

There are plenty of great places to watch along the route, with sponsors and charities at spots along the route to cheer runners on and keep them moving.

The Mall is located between Mile 1 and 2 and between Mile 4 and 5 on the route, allowing spectators to spot runners in two directions. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

Runners pass Horse Guards Parade with views of the London Eye.

Serpentine Road in Hyde Park also sees runners in both directions – between Mile 5 and 6 and between Mile 8 and 9.

It is a popular spot, with charities creating a lot of atmosphere.

The Albert Memorial is the perfect spot near the finish line to cheer runners home.

Many central London roads will be closed for the event.

Roads within Hyde Park will be closed from 12.01am on Sunday, October 11, until 5am on Monday, October 12.

Roads within St James’s Park will be closed from 6am until 6.30pm on Sunday, and roads within Westminster will be closed from 7am until 12.30pm. ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==

A map of road closures during the event

Hyde Park and Kensington Gardens will be open to the public as usual throughout the weekend, but users may be directed to different gates to access the parks on Sunday.

Emergency vehicle access will be maintained across the route at all times, and drivers are advised to plan their journeys in advance and allow additional time.

Make sure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google searches by adding us as a favourite source. Click here to activate. Or add us as your preferred source to your Google Search settings.

Montia Sabbag’s Witness Role Could Bring Kevin Hart’s Old Standby Back

0

Montia Sabbag, the woman at the centre of Kevin Hart’s 2017 Las Vegas sex tape scandal, may be called back into a courtroom nine years after the controversy first erupted.

Hart’s former personal assistant, Miesha Shakes, has identified Sabbag as a potential witness in her ongoing legal dispute with the comedian, according to court documents obtained by TMZ and reported on October 7, 2026.

Shakes wants Sabbag to answer questions about the 2017 incident and the extortion investigation that followed. If a judge allows her testimony, the details of one of the most damaging episodes of Hart’s career could enter the court record again, this time in a dispute about a non-disclosure agreement that has nothing directly to do with the original tape.

Hart filed the current case in December 2023. Hart sued Shakes and YouTube personality Latasha “Tasha K” Kebe for extortion, defamation, breach of contract, and invasion of privacy after Shakes gave a tell-all interview to Kebe about her time working as Hart’s assistant. Hart alleges that the pair demanded $250,000 to not publish the interview and that Shakes violated her NDA by discussing his personal life.

Shakes has been fighting back on multiple fronts. Among her defences, the NDA is unenforceable because Hart allegedly failed to meet his end of it, and he has damaged his own reputation through his conduct over the years. The 2017 scandal, she argues, is one example of that pattern.

Sabbag’s potential testimony is one piece of that strategy. Shakes also plans to take the stand herself and intends to call Hart as a witness. The case is open in Los Angeles Superior Court. No trial date has been publicly set.

Montia Sabbag at a 2017 Los Angeles press conference discussing the Kevin Hart sex tape scandal | Image Source: x.com

Montia Sabbag Witness Role: Why She Matters to the Shakes Case

For nine years, one weekend in Las Vegas in August 2017 has almost entirely defined Montia Sabbag’s connection to Hart. Her potential testimony in the current case would reach back to that weekend and the investigation that followed, pulling details into a courtroom that most observers assumed were long settled.

Shakes identified Sabbag in her filings as someone with direct knowledge of the 2017 incident and the subsequent extortion inquiry. According to TMZ’s report, Shakes wants to question Sabbag about:

  • The circumstances of the recording itself
  • The extortion investigation that followed
  • Sabbag’s interactions with Hart and his associates during that period
  • How the incident affected Hart’s public reputation

Shakes’s underlying argument is that Hart’s reputation was already damaged by his own behaviour long before she gave her interview to Tasha K. If Hart’s claim is that Shakes defamed him and injured his good name, Shakes wants to show the court that Hart’s name had suffered its own injuries years earlier, through conduct he admitted to on Instagram in a public video apology to his pregnant wife.

Sabbag’s testimony, if permitted, would place that history on the record from a firsthand witness. For a legal strategy aimed at undermining Hart’s reputational damage claim, having the woman from the 2017 tape describe the incident in open court would be difficult to beat for impact.

Whether Sabbag will testify is still uncertain. A judge has not ruled on whether her testimony will be allowed. Sabbag herself has not publicly indicated whether she will agree to appear or whether she would need to be compelled by subpoena.

Who Is Montia Sabbag

Montia Sabbag is an American model. She was 28 years old in 2017 when she met Kevin Hart. She is approximately 37 now.

Before 2017, Sabbag had maintained a low profile. She had modelling work but was not a public figure. That changed when TMZ published a report on September 10, 2017, describing a “graphic” video that showed Hart with a woman who was not his wife.

Montia Sabbag Witness Role Could Bring Kevin Hart's Old Sc@ndal Back
Montia Sabbag poses playfully in a leopard-print fur coat and oversized glasses. | Image Source: Rolling Out

Sabbag was identified as that woman in the days that followed. In September 2017, she held a press conference alongside celebrity attorney Lisa Bloom to publicly deny any involvement in the recording of the video or in the extortion attempt that followed. She acknowledged that she appears in the recording but has maintained since then that she did not film it, did not consent to being filmed, and had no role in trying to monetise it.

That public position has not changed in the nine years since.

In 2019, Sabbag filed a $60 million lawsuit against Hart, Jonathan “J.T.” Jackson, the Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas, and other related parties. The suit accused them of intentional infliction of emotional distress, violations of privacy, and negligence. Sabbag alleged that Hart and Jackson had conspired to create the tape to generate publicity for Hart’s irresponsible tour.

Hart denied the allegations. The lawsuit was eventually dismissed.

The 2017 Las Vegas Scandal: What Happened

The scandal that produced the current witness request started with a trip to Las Vegas in August 2017.

Hart, who was 38 at the time and whose wife, Eniko Parrish, was pregnant with their first child together, travelled to Las Vegas with Jonathan Todd “J.T.” Jackson, a long-time friend. The two stayed at The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas.

In an August 2023 deposition from a separate lawsuit, Hart described taking the drug Molly (MDMA) that weekend after being pressured by a friend. He said he met Sabbag and another woman named Morgan and brought them to his hotel suite.

Hart said in the deposition that he did not have sex with Sabbag the first night. He had sex with her the following morning. He also said in the deposition that Sabbag appeared to be positioning herself near what later turned out to be a hidden camera.

Soon after the Las Vegas trip, someone sent Hart’s wife Eniko an anonymous message claiming her husband was cheating. The message reportedly included a Dropbox link containing an edited video of Hart engaged in an intimate act with a woman.

The footage leaked publicly in September 2017. The FBI began investigating the extortion plot.

On September 16, 2017, Hart posted a public video apology to his Instagram account. He addressed his wife and children directly and acknowledged what he called a bad lapse in judgement. He did not name Sabbag.

In the comments on that Instagram post, Jackson allegedly wrote a message suggesting Hart should pay $5 million or the video would be released. That comment later became the basis for an extortion charge against Jackson, though the charge was ultimately dismissed because prosecutors concluded a public Instagram comment did not fit the legal definition of extortion.

Jonathan Jackson: Hart’s Friend Who Became an Investigation Target

Jonathan Todd “J.T.” Jackson, Hart’s long-time friend, became the central figure in the extortion investigation that followed the tape’s release.

Prosecutors alleged that Jackson had set up a hidden camera in Hart’s Las Vegas hotel suite and recorded the encounter with Sabbag. Jackson was arrested in 2018 and charged with multiple felonies, including attempted extortion, attempted concealment and sale of stolen property, and two counts of unauthorised use of personal identifying information.

In October 2019, a Los Angeles judge dismissed the count of extortion by threatening letter. In October 2021, the remaining charges against Jackson were all dropped.

Jackson and Hart reached a settlement agreement in 2021. Under the terms of that settlement, Hart was reportedly required to make a public statement declaring Jackson’s innocence and acknowledging that the scandal had cost him a valuable friendship.

In July 2024, Jackson filed a $12 million breach of contract lawsuit against Hart, alleging that Hart had not fulfilled the settlement’s requirements. That case has produced its own trail of court filings, including the August 2023 deposition in which Hart described taking Molly and meeting Sabbag.

The Jackson case and the Shakes case are separate. But both have roots in the same 2017 weekend, and the testimony requests in both cases could bring new details of that weekend into the public record.

The Shakes Case: NDA, Interview, and Extortion Claims

Hart filed the current lawsuit that could bring Sabbag back into court in December 2023.

Miesha Shakes worked as Hart’s personal assistant from August 2017 to October 2020. During that time, she signed a non-disclosure agreement that, according to Hart’s filings, prohibited her from discussing the private lives or employment status of Hart Enterprises employees.

In December 2023, Shakes gave an interview to Latasha “Tasha K” Kebe on the YouTube channel “Unwine with Tasha K.” The interview was titled “Kevin Hart’s Personal Assistant Tells All!”

In the interview, Shakes made several allegations about Hart:

  • That he had a serious gambling problem
  • That he had cheated on his wife multiple times
  • That he had filmed at least one of those encounters
  • That he had gotten one woman pregnant
  • That he had engaged in an intimate relationship with a woman in his employ

Hart’s lawsuit alleges that before the interview was published, Kebe or someone acting on her behalf demanded $250,000 to refrain from releasing the video. Hart contacted the police and sent a cease-and-desist letter.

The interview was published on December 7, 2023.

Hart filed suit later that month in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The complaint named both Shakes and Kebe as defendants and included claims of extortion, defamation, breach of contract (against Shakes), invasion of privacy, and intentional interference with contractual relations (against Kebe).

In 2024, a Los Angeles judge dismissed the extortion claim but allowed the defamation and breach of contract claims to proceed.

Shakes has argued, among other defences, that her NDA is unenforceable because Hart allegedly did not fulfil his obligation to provide her with three years of health insurance under the terms of her 2017 employment contract.

The Timeline That Connects It All

DateEvent
August 2017Hart and Jackson travel to Las Vegas; Hart meets Montia Sabbag at The Cosmopolitan.
August 2017Sabbag was Hart’s personal assistant from this month.
September 10, 2017TMZ reports on the sex tape; Hart identified; Sabbag soon identified
September 16, 2017Hart posts a video apology to his wife, Eniko, on Instagram.
2018J.T. Jackson was charged with multiple felonies, including attempted extortion.
2019Sabbag files $60 million lawsuit against Hart, Jackson, and Cosmopolitan.
October 2019Judge dismisses extortion by threatening letter count against Jackson.
October 2020Shakes’s employment with Hart ends.
2021All remaining charges against Jackson dropped; Hart and Jackson reach settlement
2022Sabbag’s $60 million lawsuit dismissed
August 2023Hart’s deposition in the Jackson case details the Las Vegas weekend.
December 7, 2023Shakes interview with Tasha K published on YouTube
December 2023Hart files lawsuit against Shakes and Tasha K.
2024The judge dismisses the extortion claim but allows defamation and breach of contract to proceed.
July 2024Jackson files $12 million breach of contract lawsuit against Hart
October 6-7, 2026Court documents reveal Shakes wants Sabbag to testify.

What Comes Next in the Hart-Shakes Case

The next step in the Shakes case depends on whether the court permits Shakes to call Sabbag as a witness and whether Sabbag can be compelled to appear.

Several possibilities remain open:

The judge allows Sabbag’s testimony. This would place Sabbag in a courtroom answering direct questions about the 2017 incident for the first time in a formal legal proceeding, as she settled her case before it reached trial. The questioning would likely frame her prior public statements, deposition in her own case, and press conference statements from 2017.

The judge limits or denies Sabbag’s testimony. Hart’s lawyers would almost certainly argue that the 2017 scandal is irrelevant to the question of whether Shakes breached her 2017 NDA by giving a 2023 interview. If the court agrees, Shakes would need to make her reputational-damage argument without Sabbag’s testimony.

Sabbag refuses to testify. Even if the court approves her as a witness, Sabbag would need to be subpoenaed to compel her appearance. She has not indicated publicly whether she would cooperate voluntarily.

Hart testifies. Shakes has stated she intends to call Hart as a witness as well. If Hart takes the stand, questions about his personal life, his relationships with Shakes and Sabbag, and the circumstances of the 2017 scandal would be raised.

The case is open and ongoing. No trial date has been publicly disclosed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Montia Sabbag?

Montia Sabbag is an American model who was identified in 2017 as the woman in a sex tape with comedian Kevin Hart. She was 28 at the time and met Hart in Las Vegas in August 2017. She has consistently denied any involvement in the filming or in the extortion attempt that followed.

Why is Montia Sabbag being asked to testify?

Kevin Hart’s former assistant Miesha Shakes identified Sabbag as a potential witness in her ongoing legal dispute with Hart. Shakes wants to question Sabbag about the 2017 incident and the extortion investigation that followed as part of her defence argument that Hart damaged his own reputation long before she gave her interview to Tasha K.

What was the scandal involving Kevin Hart’s sex tape in 2017?

In August 2017, Hart met Sabbag in Las Vegas and had an encounter at The Cosmopolitan hotel, where they secretly recorded it. The video surfaced in September 2017. Hart posted a public video apology to his pregnant wife Eniko. His long-time friend Jonathan “J.T.” Jackson was later charged with attempting to extort Hart over the tape. All charges against Jackson were eventually dropped.

Did Montia Sabbag sue Kevin Hart?

Yes. In 2019, Sabbag filed a $60 million lawsuit against Hart, Jackson, the Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas, and other related parties. The suit was eventually dismissed.

What is the Miesha Shakes case about?

Hart sued Shakes in December 2023, alleging that she breached a non-disclosure agreement by discussing his personal life in an interview with YouTuber Tasha K. Hart’s lawsuit also alleges that Shakes and Kebe demanded $250,000 to not publish the interview. Shakes argues the NDA is unenforceable because Hart allegedly failed to provide promised health insurance.

Will Kevin Hart have to testify?

Shakes has indicated she plans to call Hart as a witness. Whether he will be required to take the stand depends on how the court proceedings unfold. No trial date has been publicly set.