Musk must urgently deal with Grok AI’s ability to generate sexually explicit images, the government warns. | Science, climate, and technology news

Ofcom expressed “serious concerns” on Monday. With the social media platform’s AI tools, it can be used to create “nude images of people” and “sexualised images of children.”

Since the year began,

According to analysis by news agency Reuters, there are also several cases where Grok created sexually explicit images of children.

“What we are seeing online in recent days is absolutely appalling and unacceptable in a civilised society,” Ms. Kendall said.

“No one should have to go through the ordeal of seeing their own intimate deepfakes online.

We cannot and will not tolerate the proliferation of these degrading and humiliating images, which disproportionately target women and girls.

“X needs to deal with this urgently. Ofcom is right to treat this as an urgent matter, and I fully support them in taking any necessary enforcement action.

Sky News has seen many users share their disgust after a deepfake bikini was shared without consent on the app.

Whistleblowers on TikTok draw attention to security concerns related to artificial intelligence.

A statement shared on X’s official security account said: “We take action against illegal content on the platform.”

A post on the Grok

“XAI has security measures in place, but improvements are ongoing to completely prevent such requests,” it added.

Is AI bigger than COVID?

On Friday, French ministers informed prosecutors of sexually explicit material generated by Grok on X, saying the “sexual and sexist” material was “clearly illegal.”.

Can X be compelled to act?

Under the Online Safety Act, which began to be fully enforced in July, it is a crime to share intimate photos of someone without their permission, even if created using AI.

The Act allows companies that enable deepfakes to be shared online to be fined up to £18m, or 10% of their eligible worldwide revenues, whichever is greater.

This also applies if Company X is based outside the UK but has many UK users or has the potential to harm UK users.

The European Union has a similar regulation, called the Digital Services Act (DSA), and can also fine companies.

Indeed, it was necessary to establish the defences of Keir Starmer and other leaders just last month.

Are we too dependent on AI?

Read more:
Why is the Trump administration so angry about Europe’s online rules?

In December, theTrump administration sanctioned British and European online security campaigners It was accused of censoring the “American point of view”.

However, in the United States, some groups are also calling on authorities to take action against xAI.

The Consumer Federation of America (CFA) wrote to the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Justice Department, and all attorneys general on Monday, demanding immediate action.

“XAI is knowingly and recklessly putting people at risk on its platform and hoping to avoid accountability just because it is AI’,” said Ben Winters, director of AI and data privacy at the CFA.

“AI is like any other product; the company broke the law and should be punished.”