Dewey says war bonds are needed to ‘rapidly’ increase defense spending

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey has said the government should start selling war bonds because Britain needs to “move very quickly” on defence spending.

Under his party’s plan, members of the public could lend the government money in the form of a bond that would last for a period of two to three years and pay the same interest as standard government bonds.

Davy said the bonds,

which the party says could raise up to £20 billion for the military, would give the public a chance to “patriotically support our defence.”.

A government spokesperson said that “new debt instruments” were under review, but they would have to represent “value for money” and be “consistent with broader fiscal objectives.”

Calls for increased defence spending have intensified in recent years, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the election of US President Donald Trump, who has often criticised NATO countries for failing to spend enough on their military.

Speaking with Laura Kuenssberg on the BBC’s Sunday, Davy said the move to sell war bonds was needed because “we are almost in a cold war-like scenario.” Russia’s use of drones, submarines and shadow fleets.

He added, “This is a serious threat and we need to move much faster than what the government is doing.

“We need to move faster.”

The Labour government has promised to increase overall defence spending from 2.3% of national income to 2.5% by 2027, at an estimated cost of an additional £6 billion per year.

It has also pledged to raise the level to 3.5% by 2035, in line with a pledge by NATO members last year.

However, there have been reports many times And The Sun plans to make Britain’s armed forces “war-ready”; £28 billion more will be needed than has been allocated so far.

The government was due to publish its defence investment plan last autumn, but it has reportedly been delayed due to concerns about costs.

Earlier this month, the head of the armed forces, Sir Richard Knighton, said Britain was “not as prepared as we should be for the kind of full-scale conflict we might face”.

On Sunday, Davy said, “Everyone can see that things have changed dramatically since the last election. The way Putin is prosecuting [the Ukraine] war, but equally important, Donald Trump’s attitude to supporting European defence.”

Given the attitude of the US President, he expressed concern about the NATO alliance.

He told the BBC: “I’m very sorry to say that because of Donald Trump, we have to question whether we can trust the United States. With him in the White House, they are no longer a reliable ally. We have to move fast.”

The Liberal Democrats said the money raised by the bond issue would be earmarked for defence and that the investment would help the government deliver “growth, jobs and higher revenues”, “which will partially offset the cost of additional debt service”.

The party said the plan would require an overhaul of the Defence Ministry’s procurement process, which has previously been criticised as wasteful.

The party says their proposal would be similar to the bond scheme used during World War I and World War II.

The government would receive interest-bearing loans from individual citizens over a period of six to 10 years. By the end of 1945, the scheme had raised £1.754m.

Posters encouraging members of the public to buy bonds—or national savings certificates—featured slogans such as “Lend to the Rescue” and “Feed the Guns with War Bonds.”

Dan Coatsworth, head of markets at investor AJ Bell, said, “War bonds are a proven way of raising money for national defence spending, but they can impose a long-term debt burden on the government.

“Theoretically, the public could demand a better interest rate for holding bonds than for cash in the bank.

“Some may feel it’s their duty to support the country, while others will treat such bonds like any other investment.”