Home Blog Page 23

Magaluf ‘Wolf Pack’ rape gang’s shocking response to police over British teen attack

0

The British victim was found crying on the hotel floor in Magaluf by a security guard after she suffered a terrifying attack by a gang of eight.

One of eight people being brought to court during the trial

One of eight people being brought to court during the trial (Image: MGE/SOLARPIX.COM)

A WEIRD ‘wolf pack’ gang who raped a British teenager in Magaluf have given a chilling response when asked about their crimes.

Five men from the gang, consisting of seven French men and a Swiss citizen, were sentenced to nine to 11 years in prison this week at the Audiencia Provincial Court in Palma, Majorca, after pleading guilty to a horrific attack on a young British holidaymaker in August 2023. Another admitted sexual assault that did not involve penetration, receiving a four-year prison sentence.

All eight admitted filming the gruesome gang rape in room 108 of the BH Mallorca resort, and two of them posted the footage on Snapchat.

And it has emerged that many of the cowardly attackers refused to co-operate with police during the investigation or in the courts afterwards and attempted to maintain silence throughout.

Insiders say many of the gang of eight refused to cooperate with investigators

Insiders say many of the gang of eight refused to cooperate with investigators (Image: MGE/SOLARPIX.COM)

Read more : The disgusting reality of party town Magaluf, from gang rape to ‘manosphere’ terror. Read more: It’s horrifying that couple were held hostage in their home and forced to hand over £800,000 of Bitcoin

A source said, “Some people have never agreed to answer questions or make statements.

These people seem, on the surface, to be normal young individuals who do not come from broken families and have never been accused of behaving out of character by linking their actions to alcohol or drug abuse. This is a very shocking case.”

French tourists Khalil Abderrahmane Mejbri and Romain Charles Michel Galatioto “orally penetrated” their victim, who was drinking heavily and “fell into a state of unconsciousness” during the gang rape that lasted half an hour.

Galatioto did the act seven times while the teen was naked except for her bra; according to court documents, all of the men signed as part of their plea bargain deals.

Frenchman Anthony Guy Gerard Wengler and Swiss citizen Lucas Hélène Ngandjeu Jamaine Tchauchou raped her “at least once”, as well as Thomas Eric Koretin Wisniewski, also from France.

Police out on patrol in Magaluf (file photo)

Police out on patrol in Magaluf (file photo) (Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Chachachou and Wengler spat on the victim and, together with Mejbri, flogged her after she was slapped by the French Satillemis Sahn.

When a security guard at the hotel arrived for his shift, he found the victim writhing on the floor in the lobby and reported the incident to the police. Two suspects were searched and extradited abroad on European arrest warrants, while six were detained in Majorca.

At least six of the men were aged between 18 and 26 when they were arrested, and none of the eight had a criminal record in Spain at the time.

Mejbri and Wisniewski were given nine years in prison for the crime of “sexual assault with physical penetration”, a serious form of sexual offence that involves having non-consensual sex with the victim. Wengler, Chatchou and Galatiotto were sentenced to 11 years in prison after admitting to the same crimes.

Sahan pleaded guilty to “sexual assault without penetration” and was sentenced to four years in prison. The eight convicted must also pay compensation of more than €100,000 (£86,000) to their victims.

Source link

extraordinary-announcement-not-enough-to-lower-oil-price

0

The International Energy Agency (IEA), a developed nation body established in the 1970s to deal with the oil crisis like the one we are facing now, has announced something extraordinary.

Its members, i.e., most of the world’s rich countries, will release unprecedented amounts of oil from their national stockpiles to the global market in the coming weeks.

This emergency reserves release is more than double the previous record, which was 400 million barrels of oil coming from its members’ reserves around the world. Yet here’s the surprising thing: oil prices barely rose, let alone fell. Following the announcement, Brent crude was still about 25% higher than before the attacks in the Gulf began.

Money Blog: Revolut to become UK bank – this is what it means

Tankers are parked in Muscat, Oman, as Iran vowed to close the Strait of Hormuz. Photo: Reuters
image:
Tankers are parked in Muscat, Oman, as Iran vowed to close the Strait of Hormuz. Photo: Reuters

All of this activity raises the question: why? The short answer is that even with this new supply of oil, the world will likely remain short of oil. The long answer comes back to the fundamental nature of the oil market.

The best way to think of the oil market is as a giant set of pipes through which crude oil and its products are constantly flowing. More important than how much oil is in the ground in the form of reservoirs or reserves is how much oil is pumped through the global system every day.

And recently, the amount pumped through the system has grown to nearly 100 million barrels of oil per day. Now, as the climate changes, these numbers keep going up and down and perhaps, in the coming years, may go down as people adopt electric cars and look for alternatives to fossil fuels. But the main thing to keep in your mind is that right now, much of the world’s standard of living – our access to transportation, electricity, consumer goods, pharmaceuticals and the rest – depends on 100 million barrels of oil pumped through the world’s pipes.

Latest Iran war: 32 countries agree to biggest oil release ever by targeting ships

All this news brings us back to the Persian Gulf, which is responsible for about 30% of the world’s oil, with about 15 million barrels of it passing through the Strait of Hormuz every day. The crux of the energy shock the world is facing is that it is facing a shortage of 15 million barrels of oil per day. In other words, it’s all about the gap – between the oil we need to keep the world running and the oil we actually have.

There just isn’t enough supply

This brings us back to the IEA’s emergency release. While the total number is certainly high, even more important is a number the organisation did not release Tuesday: how much oil it expects to produce each day. In other words, how much of the 15 million barrel gap will those emergency supplies make up?

The expectation among analysts is that this number will be 4-5 million barrels, which is nothing more than, as you may know if you have the rudimentary math, the world being short of at least 10 million barrels of oil every day.

There are other sources of oil also.

For one thing, Saudi Arabia, and to a lesser extent the United Arab Emirates, can pump more oil through their pipelines to ports that are not inside the Gulf (in other words, meaning tankers do not need to face the strait). Optimistically, such a scenario could mean another 5.7 million barrels of oil.

Hormuz is still being traversed by some ships. An educated guess suggests that it could bring in an additional five million or, perhaps, one million barrels from outside.

However, even considering the best-case scenario, overall you are still talking about a loss of 4 million barrels of oil for the global economy. This figure is much less scary than the $15 million reduction we started with, but still not enough to cover global oil consumption.

Why are prices still high?

This is at least partially responsible for the high oil prices and the global impact. We focus here in Europe on the things we are starting to see – on higher petrol prices and the implications for bills. But it is also spreading elsewhere, especially in Asia. Indian oil refineries are closing; provinces are cutting the supply of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to local households. Workers in Thailand and Vietnam are being urged to work from home to protect petrol supplies.

And the longer this goes on, the greater the effects we will see. The world is facing an energy shortage; it is not clear how it bridges this.



Source link

As Iran attacks ships, threatens banks and toll on US military rises, Trump vows to end war soon

0

A senior Qatari official who worked for years in the Gulf state’s foreign ministry told CBS News on Wednesday that the Middle East is, “for all intents and purposes,” embroiled in a regional war that governments in the region have been warning about for years.

Dr. Majid al-Ansari, an adviser to Qatar’s prime minister and official spokesman for the country’s Foreign Ministry, informed CBS News that Gulf countries have consistently warned that unchecked tensions could lead to escalation in Syria, Gaza, and Lebanon.

According to Doha, that dire prophecy has now been fulfilled.

He told CBS News, “We clearly stated that unchecked tensions would lead to a regional war.” “Currently, we are effectively experiencing a regional war.”

Iran has targeted seven Gulf countries.

Iran has targeted seven Gulf countries since the US and Israel launched attacks on the Islamic republic on February 28, he said, drawing countries into a war they never wanted to be a part of.

Al-Ansari stated that missile alerts now illuminate people’s phones throughout the night, and interceptors soar overhead, shaking the reality of Qataris.

“Such activity is a daily occurrence now,” he said. “We wake up at 4 a.m. to alerts on our phones.”

“I never imagined that my daughters would live in a situation where missiles would fly over us almost constantly throughout the day,” al-Ansari said.

Source link

Home Office won’t reveal how many migrant families are taking £40k payment in the UK | news

0

(Stock Image) Unsuccessful asylum seekers are being offered £40K to leave the UK (Image: Getty)

The Home Office has refused to reveal the number of unsuccessful asylum seeker families who have been deported from Britain and paid £40,000 of taxpayers’ cash to leave them. The staggering sum, which is more than the average UK annual salary, has been offered as yet another bizarre plan by the Home Office, led by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood,grant crisis.

Unveiled last Thursday, the new policy gives £10,000 per person from a family of four if they agree to leave the UK. Reports indicate that at least 150 families have received notification of their eligibility to apply for the cash. On this basis alone, if four members in each of those families were awarded £10K, the total would bring the initial outlay of taxpayer cash to £6 million, enough to employ around 150 NHS nurses for a year.

The last date for failed asylum families to apply for the hefty sum is midnight today (Wednesday). Those who do not apply will lose the opportunity to make a claim.

A Home Office spokesperson declined to say how many families had accepted the handouts by 6pm today, with just hours left until the deadline, Mail Online reports.

Read more: Labor accused of offering £40k ‘reward’ to illegal immigrants, outrage

Read more: Criminal migrants face being kicked out of hotels and asylum accommodation

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood is overseeing a cash-to-leave scheme for asylum seekers (Image: Getty)

Home Office minister Alex Norris said earlier this month that it costs on average about £158,000 a year to support families seeking unsuccessful asylum. Their boss, Ms Mahmoud, has approved large payouts to families asked to leave because the government argues it will save money in the long run.

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philip criticised “enhanced incentive payments” of up to £10,000 per person and £40,000 per family for leaving the UK under a pilot scheme.

Mr Philip said, “The government is now bribing illegal immigrants to leave with £40,000 per family. That’s more than most working people here earn in a year.

“British workers should not have to pay record-high taxes to this government to give their money to illegal immigrants. Such behaviour is frankly outrageous.

“Instead, the government should now agree to our plan to leave the ECHR (European Convention of Human Rights), which will enable them to rapidly deport all illegal immigrants.

“Then the crossings would be closed immediately, and there would be no need to bribe illegal immigrants to leave.”

***Make sure our latest news headlines always appear at the top of your Google search by making us a favourite source. Click here to activate Or add us as a preferred source to your Google search settings. ***

Migrants whose asylum applications are rejected could be paid £40K by British taxpayer (Image: Getty)

Reform’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yousaf said, “Incredibly, Labour is increasing the incentive for illegals to leave voluntarily by offering them a grand package of £40,000.

“It’s more than the average salary in Britain. The government is rewarding those who illegally enter the country. It’s outrageous.”

Reform had previously said that illegal immigrants would be offered “financial incentives to self-deport” during a six-month period if the government was in power. The Home Secretary unveiled the plan as she argued in a speech at the centre-left think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) that Labour should not be tempted to be “greener” or “more reformist” on its migration policy.

a Home Office spokesman said,

Hitting back at suggestions that the scheme would attract more migrants to Britain, a Home Office spokesman said, “This proposal is not an attraction factor. Illegal migrants pay smugglers thousands of pounds to get to Britain.”

“If those families refuse the time-limited payment offer, we will forcibly remove them.”

The Home Office estimates the proposal could save taxpayers £20 million.

A source said: “Our intelligence shows that smugglers charge between £15,000 and £35,000 per illegal migrant. As a result, the pilot who was paid to drop them off cannot act as a pull factor, since it costs more to get here in the first place. If they do not take up this offer, the family will be forcibly removed.”

Since March 4, Home Office figures show that almost a thousand migrants have crossed the Channel illegally to reach the UK aboard 15 small boats.

Source link

Winter Paralympics 2026: Germans protest against Russia during medal ceremony

0

German cross-country skiers turned their backs on gold Russian medallists on the Winter Paralympics podium in protest against the country’s inclusion in the Games.

For the first time since 2014, Russian athletes are competing under their country’s flag at the Paralympics, after the International Paralympic Committee lifted the country’s suspension in September.

Russia and its athletes were banned following a state-sponsored doping scandal before further sanctions were imposed following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

On Tuesday, Anastasia Bagyan and her guide, Sergei Siniyakin, won gold in the women’s sprint classic visually impaired event, Russia’s second of three golds so far at the Games.

As the national anthem played, silver medallist Lynn Kazmaier of Germany and her guide, Florian Baumann, turned their backs on the Russians.

Speaking to German outlet Bild, external Kazmaier said: “The medal ceremony felt completely strange. I don’t know. [Russians] I don’t know; maybe they support this system in Russia as little as we do.

“Maybe they’re genuinely people we can be friends with. It’s completely covered up in politics; it’s a complete shame that the true sentiments of the people are often overshadowed by governmental actions and propaganda.

So we decided to leave our hats off and stay away from the flag, because we oppose that.

Source link

‘No endgame’: Why US Democrats say Iran war hearings have them worried US-Israel war over Iran news

0

A group of Democrats in the United States Senate are demanding public hearings on the country’s war against Iran after receiving a series of classified briefings from President Donald Trump’s administration officials.

Lawmakers say the White House has not clearly explained why the US entered the conflict, what its goals are or how long it might last.

Republicans currently hold a narrow, 53-47 Senate majority, giving them the power to control what legislation comes to the floor for debate.

Some Democrats have expressed frustration after the latest closed-door briefing.

Trump has not ruled out sending US ground forces to Iran.

“I just came from a two-hour classified briefing on the war,” Connecticut State Senator Chris Murphy said Tuesday. “The briefing confirmed to me that the strategy is completely inconsistent.

“I think it’s very simple: if the President did what the Constitution requires and came to Congress to ask for authorisation for this war, he would not get it — because the American people would demand that their members of Congress vote no,” he said.

Here’s what we know:

What happened till now?

Since the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, senior officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, have held several closed-door meetings to brief members of Congress on the military operation and its progress.

Because the meetings are classified, lawmakers are prohibited from publicly disclosing the information they receive.

US President Donald Trump listened to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio
US President Donald Trump listened to Foreign Minister Marco Rubio. [File: Nathan Howard/Reuters]

What are the Democrats saying?

Several Democratic senators said they left the briefing disappointed, arguing that the administration did not provide clear answers about war objectives, a timeline or a long-term strategy to guide their approach to the conflict.

Earlier this week, six Democratic senators also called for an investigation into the attack on a girls’ school in Minab, southern Iran. Reports indicate that the attack, which investigators say involved US forces, killed at least 170 people, the majority of whom were children.

Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal said, “It looks like there is no endgame.” “The president, in a contradictory manner, states that the war is almost over, while simultaneously asserting that it has just begun.” This presents a contradiction.

Senator Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts expressed concern over the cost of the war.

“One part that seems clear is that while 15 million Americans have lost their health care, there’s no money for them, but there’s a billion dollars a day to spend on bombing Iran,” Warren said Tuesday.

“One thing Congress has the power to do is stop actions like this through the power of money,” he said.

Others seem concerned that there could be a ground-level deployment.

“It looks like we’re on track to deploy American troops on the ground in Iran to meet any potential objective here,” Blumenthal, of Connecticut, told reporters after Tuesday’s classified briefing.

He said, “The American people deserve to know more than what this administration has told us about the cost of war, the danger to our sons and daughters in uniform, and the potential for this war to escalate and widen.”

Richard Blumenthal
Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut [File: Ben Curtis/AP]

What are the Republicans saying?

Republicans, who hold slim majorities in both houses of Congress, have almost unanimously supported Trump’s campaign against Iran, with only a handful expressing scepticism about war.

Some Republican leaders say the strikes are necessary to curb Iran’s military capabilities, missile programme and regional influence.

They have also argued that the operation is limited in scope and designed to weaken Iran’s ability to threaten US forces and allies in the region.

Republican Representative Brian Mast of Florida, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, last week publicly thanked Trump for taking action against Iran and said the president is using his constitutional authority to defend the US against the “imminent threat” posed by Tehran.

But some Republican members of Congress have expressed concern.

Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina said in a post on X that she “did not want to send the sons and daughters of South Carolina to war with Iran”.

Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky accused the Trump administration of changing its narrative and rationale for war on a daily basis.

“We keep hearing new reasons for war with Iran – none are solid,” he wrote on X.

Why does debate matter?

The controversy has revived a long-running debate in Washington, D.C., about the limits of presidential war powers.

Under the US Constitution, Congress has the authority to declare war, but modern presidents have often launched military operations without formal congressional approval, citing national security or emergency threats.

The law allows the President to deploy U.S. troops for up to 60 days without Congress’s permission, followed by a 30-day withdrawal period if Congress does not approve the action.

Some lawmakers and legal experts say the war on Iran highlights the need for stronger congressional oversight of military action.

“In the 1970s, we adopted something called the War Powers Resolution that gives the president a limited ability to do that,” said David Schultz, a professor in the department of political science and law at Hamline University.

“And so, you can either argue that what the president is doing violates the Constitution… No [being] formally declared war; or B, it exceeds his authority, either as Commander-in-Chief or under the War Powers Act,” he said.

“And so, you can argue that domestically, their actions are illegal and unconstitutional,” Schultz said.

The Trump administration has argued that the February 28 attacks were justified as a response to an “imminent threat”, an argument often used by presidents to justify military action without prior congressional approval.

However, US intelligence agencies themselves stated before the war began that they had no evidence of an imminent Iranian threat to the US or its facilities throughout the Middle East.

Source link

Centcom says US forces destroy 16 Iranian mines near Strait of Hormuz. World News

0

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) announced on Wednesday (March 11) that it has destroyed several Iranian naval vessels, including 16 minelayers, near the Strait of Hormuz.

 

CENTCOM released a video on its official

In a separate post, US Central Command said US forces were “degrading the Iranian regime’s ability to project power at sea and harass international shipping.”

It condemned Tehran for endangering “freedom of navigation in waters essential to American, regional and global security and prosperity.”

The announcement comes after US President Donald Trump said US forces have attacked and destroyed 10 decommissioned mine-laying boats in the Strait of Hormuz.

He threatened to increase attacks on Iran and warned Tehran not to plant any mines in the Strait of Hormuz.

In a post on Truth Social, the US President said, “If Iran has placed any mines in the Strait of Hormuz, and we have had no reports of it doing so, we want them removed immediately! If the mines were placed for any reason, and they are not immediately removed, the military consequences for Iran would be at a level never seen before.

Conversely, their removal would represent a significant advancement! Additionally, we are using the same technology and missile capabilities deployed against drug smugglers to permanently destroy any boat or ship that attempts mining in the Strait of Hormuz. We will handle them swiftly and ruthlessly. Be careful.”

The Express Global Desk at The Indian Express provides authoritative, verified and context-driven coverage of key international developments shaping global politics, policy and migration trends.

The desk focuses on stories of direct relevance to Indian and global audiences, combining breaking news with in-depth explainers and analysis. A major focus area of ​​the desk is U.S. immigration and visa policy, including developments related to student visas, work permits, permanent residence pathways, executive actions, and court decisions.

The Global Desk also closely monitors Canada’s immigration, visa and study policies, including changes to study permits, post-study work options, the permanent residence programme, and regulatory updates affecting immigrants and international students. All reporting by Global Desk follows

The Indian Express’ editorial standards rely on official data, government notifications, court documents and on-record sources.

The Desk prioritises clarity, accuracy and accountability, ensuring readers can navigate complex global systems with confidence. Core Team The Express Global Desk is led by a team of experienced journalists and editors with deep expertise in international affairs and migration policy: Anirudh Dhar –

Senior assistant editor with extensive experience in global affairs, international politics and editorial leadership. Nishchay Vatsa – Deputy copy editor specialising in US politics,

Nishchay Vatsa, the Deputy Copy Editor, focuses on US politics, US visa and immigration policy, and policy-driven international coverage. Mashkoora Khan – Sub-editor with an emphasis on Canada visa, immigration and study-related policy coverage, focusing on global development. 



Source link

A Senegalese boarding school that attracted students from the US is at the center of an abuse investigation

0

Dakar, Senegal — at American Dara Academy, Senegal, it marketed itself as an affordable boarding school for families in the United States where their children could study the Quran alongside the American curriculum. Parents and families – many of whom are of West African descent – ​​sent their children to the school, believing it would provide a rigorous and affordable religious education.

But according to an official close to the case,

the school is being investigated for alleged physical abuse.

Hundreds of students have withdrawn from the academy and one of the two campuses – where most of the alleged abuse took place – is now closed.

In accounts shared with The Associated Press, students alleged that supervisors repeatedly beat disobedient students in the so-called “magic room”. Schoolchildren said they were sometimes ordered to remove their underwear or remain naked and were asked to sit with their arms outstretched while holding heavy rocks. If rocks fell, the damage increased further.

Senegalese officials confirmed to the AP that an investigation is ongoing. The country’s gendarmerie, its child protection services and the Justice Ministry are involved in the investigation, according to an official close to the case.

In late January, the school’s director and three administrators were arrested, according to parents and a person with direct knowledge of the arrests and investigation. He said the director was released and placed under house arrest.

Senegal’s child protective services, known by its French acronym AEMO, did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for the Gendarmerie, Ibrahima Ndiaye, confirmed that the force had been informed about the abuses but said the investigation was now with the Justice Ministry.

The arrested school director and administrators told the AP they could not talk about the case due to the ongoing investigation. Exact charges have not been announced.

Justice Ministry spokeswoman Aminata Diagne said of the ongoing investigation into the abuse, “The children are in the care of the authorities, and charges will be filed against whoever is found responsible.”

The American Daraa Academy enrols 311 students across two campuses in Senegal – including 120 US citizens. Most of the students were children of West African descent born in the United States, with some from European countries such as France, the United Kingdom, and Belgium. Only a few were from West Africa.

According to a January 12 written complaint sent to Senegalese authorities by the US Embassy in Dakar, several American students reported severe corporal punishment. According to the letter, the minors accused the school’s director, who is a dual American-Guinean citizen, and three other administrators of being responsible for the abuse.

The AP spoke to dozens of parents and officials involved in the case to verify the authenticity of the complaint letter and its claims about abuse. The parents and officials who agreed to be interviewed did so without worrying about their children’s safety because they were not allowed to speak on the issue.

In their accounts, the students reported that administrators beat them with sticks on their legs, backs and private parts, forcing them to maintain a tense posture.

Some students said that steel rods were sometimes used on areas that did not leave visible marks. He said that many times the blows also fell on his head.

It is unclear whether any injuries required hospitalisation, but some students have reported getting marks on multiple parts of their bodies.

According to the embassy complaint letter and a person familiar with the matter, the students were warned by their abusers not to speak to U.S. embassy officials or police; otherwise, their parents in the United States could be arrested and deported by immigration authorities.

The ministry and other related agencies have released few details about the case or possible charges.

Some parents told the AP they chose the American Dara Academy for its combination of religious education and an American curriculum at a relatively low cost of about $300 a month, including tuition, housing and meals.

The school ran two campuses, one in the capital, Dakar, and the other in Toubab Diallah, a coastal village 55 kilometres (34 mi) from the capital.

Before its closure, the high school campus in Taubab Diylaw – where most of the alleged abuse took place – consisted largely of a construction site with trailers, no running water, frequent power outages and makeshift zinc toilets. However, an official with direct knowledge of the investigation reported that the facility was teaching students.

After the embassy contacted the families, about two-thirds of the students—about 250 children, including about 100 Americans—withdrew from the school and returned to their home countries, according to parents and a person familiar with the investigation. The Dakar campus, in better condition, received the remaining students.

Dozens of parents spoke to the AP, many of whom reported receiving contact from the US Embassy regarding the alleged abuse. None said their children told them about the abuse.

One parent, who spoke on condition of anonymity to protect their child’s privacy, said they have taken their children back and are waiting to be brought back to the US. He claimed that his children were not among those who reported experiencing abuse.

“When I went to school for the first time, I stayed with them for a week,” the parent said. “I really thought I was leaving them in a safe place.”

In Senegal, corporal punishment in homes is legal under the country’s family law, which gives the “right to correction” to those with parental authority, although criminal laws punish violence that causes serious injuries.

While corporal punishment is prohibited in schools for children under 14, the law does not explicitly extend to children outside that age range, private schools, or religious schools, where the “right to reform” may still potentially apply.

The United Nations and the Children’s Rights Organization report that corporal punishment continues in practice.

It is unclear whether prosecutors will file charges or if further action is being considered.

Right now, the investigation is ongoing, and the children who once filled its dorms have dispersed—some back home, others still in school and waiting for answers.

The school building in Dakar is under tight security and police are guarding the place.

——-

Associated Press writer Babacar Dion in Dakar, Senegal, contributed to this report.

Source link

Iran War: Is Trump Trying to End It Because He’s Over a Barrel? | American news

0

Words are cheap, but the price of oil is extremely honest.

Donald Trump’s claim That the war could end “soon” will make headlines.

Iran war: follow live updates

But traders do not trade on soundbites. They trade at risk.

This explains the sudden urgency of the Commander-in-Chief.

Ten days ago he had warned that the war could last four to six weeks.

He’s claiming it could end “very soon.”

“Not this week,” he told an audience in Florida, but the objectives are “very well accomplished.”

Trump: Iran war will end ‘very soon’

He enumerated his battlefield successes, asserting that he had hit 5,000 targets.

The President said he would “regard” the outcome of the report on a school strike.

But he tried to shift the blame elsewhere for the attack, which claimed dozens of lives.

Trump said many countries, including Iran, use Tomahawks, a “common” weapon.

The UK, Australia, the Netherlands and Japan are the only other countries with Tomahawks.

Unless he is suggesting that one of them attacked, he has effectively implicated the US.

Read more: Evidence challenges Trump’s claim

Iran school strike: what we know

Trump’s ‘epic’ problem

Still, he appears ready to declare victory and get off-ramp.

But his new optimism lands where politics and markets collide.

U.S. crude rose to $119 a barrel, then fell a record 4% at the close.

This is a problem for Trump that Iran has already acknowledged by mocking the military codename: “Operation Epic Fury.”.

“Operation Epic Mistake,” the country’s foreign minister posted along with a graphic of the oil prices.

What effect will the Iran war have on the economy?

Read more from Sky News:
Inside Frontline Ghost Town
Erdogan’s clear message on Iran war

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard says it will “determine the end of the war”.

In a statement, it said Tehran would not allow the export of “one litre of oil” from the region if US and Israeli attacks continued.

Trump posted on Truth Social: “If Iran does anything that stops the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, the United States will hit them twenty times more heavily than they have already.”

If a businessman is sitting in London, Houston, or Singapore, the question is not what Trump says but what happens on the ground.

In times of conflict, the price of a barrel speaks louder and more truthfully than a president’s promise of peace.

Source link

Airfare hike due to rise in oil prices amid US-Israel war over Iran

0

Global airlines are starting to pass the burden of rising fuel costs on to passengers amid rising oil prices. The America-Israel war is going on in Iran.

New Zealand’s national carrier, Air New Zealand, said on Tuesday it had raised ticket prices across its network and warned that further fare adjustments could be made if fuel prices remain high, news agency Reuters reported.

According to the airline, the escalating conflict in the Middle East has sharply raised jet fuel prices, significantly increasing operating costs and creating uncertainty for the global aviation industry.

Air New Zealand has confirmed it has implemented fare increases on several routes to compensate for the rise in jet fuel prices. According to the news agency, the airline said one-way economy fares had increased by NZ$10 (USD 5.92) on domestic routes, NZ$20 on short-haul international flights and NZ$90 on long-haul services. Reuters informed.

Jet fuel prices, which were around $85 to $90 a barrel before the conflict, have risen dramatically recently to between $150 and $200 a barrel, the airline said.

The carrier also announced it was suspending its financial outlook for 2026, citing uncertainty arising from the conflict and volatile fuel markets, the report said. “If jet fuel costs continue to rise due to the conflict, we may need to take further pricing actions and adjust our network and schedules as necessary,” the airline said in its statement to Reuters.

Air New Zealand said there are currently no disruptions to jet fuel supplies in New Zealand, but the airline is working closely with suppliers and government agencies to monitor the situation.

During this time, Hong Kong Airlines announced on its website that it will increase its fuel surcharge by 35.2% from Thursday, with the sharpest increases on flights between Hong Kong and the Maldives, Bangladesh and Nepal, where the charge will rise from HK$284 to HK$384 ($49).

Cathay Pacific also reviewed its fuel surcharges on a monthly basis, after keeping them stable last month – i.e., before the conflict began – at $72.90 each way on flights between Hong Kong and Europe, and North America.

In Southeast Asia, Vietnam Airlines officials have been asked to remove environmental taxes on jet fuel to help maintain operations. The Vietnamese government said the country has seen operating costs for airlines rise by 60% to 70% due to higher fuel prices, while suppliers are struggling to meet rising demand, which has led to increased financial pressure on airlines and contributed to a decline in their stock prices.

Airlines shares fall after oil price rise

Oil prices fell from a high of $119 on Monday to around $90 a barrel on Tuesday, allaying some investors’ concerns, according to Reuters. However, airline stocks in Asia showed signs of recovery after US President Donald Trump said on Monday that the conflict could end soon.

Airline stocks rose as a result. Shares of Air New Zealand rose nearly 2%, Korean Air Lines rose 8%, Australia’s Qantas Airways rose 1.5%, and Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific rose more than 4%, recovering part of losses recorded earlier in the week.

Iran war-related oil price surge could slow international travel

The US-Israeli military campaign against Iran has roiled global oil markets, sending crude prices soaring and raising fears of a significant slowdown in international travel.

Rising fuel costs are a major concern for airlines, as fuel is typically the second largest expense after labour, accounting for 20%–25% of operating costs.

Conflict-related airspace disruptions are also complicating flight operations, forcing airlines to reroute aircraft and increasing travel time and fuel consumption.

The travel industry is bracing for prolonged disruption

The ongoing conflict is also beginning to impact travel demand and tourism in many areas.

Airlines are already navigating congested airspace as pilots reroute flights to avoid conflict areas, reducing capacity on key long-haul routes and sending ticket prices rising.

According to aviation analytics firm Cirium, Middle Eastern carriers—including Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Etihad—normally transport about a third of the passengers travelling from Europe to Asia and more than half the passengers flying from Europe to Australia, New Zealand, and the nearby Pacific islands. Any disruption to these networks could have a cascading effect on global travel.

Tour operators are also adjusting plans. South Korea’s Hanatour service said it had cancelled group tours involving flights to the Middle East and waived cancellation fees for affected customers. All Middle East-related tours have been suspended for March.

Economies dependent on tourism are also warning of financial losses. Thailand’s Tourism Ministry has estimated that if the conflict continues for more than eight weeks, the country could lose 595,974 visitors and approximately 40.9 billion baht ($1.29 billion) in tourism revenue.

As global travel patterns and fuel markets continue to struggle to reshape, airlines are bracing for further volatility. Industry analysts have warned that if oil prices remain high and airspace restrictions continue, travellers around the world could face higher ticket prices and fewer flight options in the coming months.

Source link