Home Blog Page 2

Donald Trump’s big World Cup day out: crowd boos, player snubs and fails at a photobomb

0

At the final moment, Donald Trump finally made his World Cup entrance. And it wasn’t all smooth sailing.

The US president, who has kept largely out of the limelight over the last five weeks, made his major intervention a fortnight ago after US striker Folarin Balogun had his red card ban suspended before their last-16 exit to Belgium after some lobbying from Trump and the US administration.

Trump did take part in a press conference with Fifa president Gianni Infantino on Friday and was always expected to attend the final at the New York-New Jersey Stadium on Sunday between Spain and Argentina.

Prior to the match, Trump told FOX that the US should host another World Cup “immediately”, saying, “We have to do this again, and we have to do this again while I am around. Hear that, Gianni?!” It should be noted that the US cannot host again until 2038 at the earliest.

Yet on a day of high drama and big-name American entertainment, here are the main flashpoints involving Trump on Sunday:

The crowd boos

To start, only a small chorus of jeers.

Trump, who arrived on Marine One and took his seat roughly 20 minutes before kick-off next to Infantino, was shown on the four big screens in the stadium just after the American national anthem. At that stage, the boos were brief.

The US president was sitting alongside Infantino and his wife Melania in a glassed-in section of VIP seats, with fellow host country leaders Mark Carney (Canada) and Claudia Sheinbaum (Mexico) in the same section.

Trump was then shown on the host broadcast around 15 minutes into the first half, when he was presented with the World Cup trophy in his VIP box.

Yet after the match, the boos bellowed out for Trump and Infantino as they entered the pitch for the trophy ceremony. The jeering was perhaps not as loud as when Trump attended Game 3 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden but was still very audible.

Donald Trump and Gianni Infantino were booed as they entered the pitch (Getty)

To be precise, the White House pool report said crowd noise increased to 84 decibels from 78 decibels when Trump entered the pitch.

Player snub

Alongside Infantino, Trump presented the runner-up’s and winners’ medals to Argentina and Spain players, respectively. Nothing unusual here, given he is the head of state of the predominant host country.

Yet one notable moment came when Argentina defender Cristian Romero, who plays his club football for Tottenham, walked past the US president and did not shake his hand.

Romero did not acknowledge Trump after receiving his medal from Infantino, but he did shake the hands of Sheinbaum and Carney.

Cristian Romero snubbing Trump
Cristian Romero snubbing Trump (Screenshot / BBC)

Even Spain’s Borja Iglesias, who has previously criticised Trump, shook the hand of the US president. He did remark pre-match of the potential encounter: “I don’t want to go to prison.”

Failed photobomb

The moment of truth. After awkwardly staying in the middle of Chelsea’s celebrations as Reece James lifted the Club World Cup a year ago, would Trump again be front and centre here?

Trump and Infantino both walked over to hand over football’s ultimate prize to Spain captain Rodri. Trump then lingered for a moment, even invoking his famous YMCA dance move, before Infantino looked to chaperone the 80-year-old to the side of the shot as he ran across the players.

Trump stayed on the stage as Rodri lifted the trophy
Trump stayed on the stage as Rodri lifted the trophy (Reuters)

Rodri waited momentarily – another key moment of patience from the player of the tournament – before lifting the trophy, with Trump lingering awkwardly on the side of the jubilant Spanish squad, as the two presidents applauded the team and departed the stage.

It was still somewhat toe-curdling, but there was no such memorable photobomb this time… despite his best efforts.

Trump then departed after the trophy lift
Trump then departed after the trophy lift (Reuters)

Carney confrontation

One of the major talking points in the build-up was the smattering of fog over New York a few days before the final as a result of severe Canadian wildfires. And Trump voiced his unhappiness with the situation to Carney at the match.

As he returned to Washington, Trump recounted their frank exchange at Joint Base Andrews. “It went good, but I told him, ‘You got to stop these fires from coming in and poisoning our air,'” the president said of his interaction with the Canadian.

“Our air has been poisoned. I have a good relationship with Mark Carney, but you know, we got to stop the fires up there. If we can help them, we will. But maybe they should pay us some damages or something, or we should impose some tariffs. But it was terrible. I mean, you had businesses closing.

Trump spoke to Mark Carney (far-right) about the Canadian wildfires
Trump spoke to Mark Carney (far-right) about the Canadian wildfires (Getty)

“I’ve never remembered this happening. Over the last four or five years, you saw it starting to take place. I never remembered it happening before.”

United States 2038?

Speaking to Fox pre-match, Trump declared that the World Cup should return to the United States “immediately.”

“Based on the numbers, we will be requesting it immediately,” Trump said, while acknowledging there would be “shock” and “anger” at such a decision. “We have to do the World Cup again, and we have to do this again while I am around. Hear that, Gianni?”

Unfortunately, with Spain, Portugal and Morocco confirmed as 2030 hosts and Saudi Arabia as the 2034 host, the US could not host until 2038 at the earliest – and even that would be an unprecedented gap of only 12 years.



Source link

The US launches new strikes on Iran as Trump warns of retaliation for troop deaths.

0

The US launches new strikes on Iran as Trump warns of retaliation for troop deaths, marking another significant escalation in the ongoing conflict between Washington and Tehran. The latest military operation comes after several American service members were killed in attacks attributed to Iran or Iranian-backed forces, prompting the Trump administration to promise a forceful response.

According to the U.S. military, the latest wave of airstrikes targeted Iranian military infrastructure, including command centres, missile and drone launch sites, maritime capabilities, and air defence systems. U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) said the operation aimed to weaken Iran’s ability to threaten American forces and international shipping in the region.

Why the United States Launched New Strikes

The renewed attacks follow the deaths of U.S. troops during recent hostilities. President Donald Trump stated that those responsible would face severe consequences and warned Iran against further attacks on American personnel.

Trump said the United States would continue military operations if Iran or its allied groups carried out additional attacks, emphasising that protecting U.S. service members remains a top priority.


Targets Hit During the Operation

CENTCOM reported that the strikes focused on military objectives rather than civilian infrastructure.

Reported targets included:

  • Military command centers
  • Missile launch facilities
  • Drone launch sites
  • Air defense systems
  • Maritime military assets

The Pentagon described the operation as part of an ongoing effort to reduce Iran’s military capabilities and protect freedom of navigation in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.


Trump Issues Strong Warning

Following the strikes, President Trump delivered one of his strongest warnings since the conflict intensified.

He said Iran had “not seen anything yet” and warned that any further attacks on American troops or interests would trigger even more powerful military action. Trump also reiterated that the United States remained open to diplomacy but would respond decisively to any aggression.


Iran’s Response

Iran has condemned the latest U.S. attacks, describing them as violations of its sovereignty.

Iranian officials have insisted they will defend the country against foreign military action while continuing to accuse Washington of escalating tensions in the region.

At the same time, diplomatic contacts involving regional and international partners are continuing in an effort to prevent the conflict from expanding further.

Growing Concerns Over Regional Stability

The latest exchange has raised concerns across the Middle East.

Analysts warn that continued military operations could:

  • Increase regional instability
  • Threaten international shipping
  • Disrupt global energy supplies
  • Raise oil prices
  • Increase the risk of wider military confrontation

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most important energy corridors, with a large share of global oil exports passing through the waterway each day. Continued fighting in the area has already affected shipping and energy markets.


Impact on Global Markets

Financial markets have reacted cautiously to the escalating conflict.

Investors are closely monitoring:

  • Crude oil prices
  • Shipping costs
  • Global stock markets
  • Currency movements
  • Insurance costs for commercial vessels

Any prolonged disruption to energy exports from the Gulf region could increase fuel prices worldwide.


International Reaction

Governments around the world have urged both sides to exercise restraint.

Several allies have called for renewed diplomatic efforts while emphasising the importance of protecting international shipping lanes and preventing further civilian casualties.

The United Nations and other international organisations continue to encourage dialogue aimed at reducing tensions before the conflict spreads further.


Humanitarian Concerns

As military operations continue, humanitarian organisations are increasingly concerned about their impact on civilians.

Potential risks include the following:

  • Displacement of families
  • Damage to infrastructure
  • Disruptions to healthcare services
  • Economic hardship
  • Reduced access to essential supplies

Aid groups continue to monitor the situation while preparing for possible increases in humanitarian needs.

 International efforts to reduce tensions and address humanitarian concerns.

What Happens Next?

Military analysts believe several possible scenarios could unfold in the coming weeks:

  • Continued U.S. air operations
  • Further Iranian retaliation
  • Increased diplomatic negotiations
  • Additional international sanctions
  • Regional security cooperation

The direction of the conflict will largely depend on whether both sides choose military escalation or renewed diplomatic engagement.


Conclusion

The US launches new strikes on Iran as Trump warns of retaliation for troop deaths during one of the most tense periods in US–Iran relations recently. The latest military action highlights Washington’s determination to respond to attacks on American personnel while also increasing concerns about the possibility of a wider regional conflict.

As diplomatic efforts continue alongside military operations, the international community remains focused on preventing further escalation that could threaten regional stability, global energy markets, and civilian safety.


Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the U.S. launch new strikes on Iran?

The U.S. carried out the strikes after attacks attributed to Iran or Iranian-backed forces killed American troops. U.S. officials said the operation targeted military infrastructure linked to future threats.

What targets were hit?

According to CENTCOM, the operation struck military command centres, missile and drone launch sites, maritime capabilities, and air defence systems.

Why is the Strait of Hormuz important?

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s busiest oil shipping routes, making any disruption there significant for global energy supplies and fuel prices.

Has diplomacy ended?

No. While military operations continue, officials from multiple countries are still pursuing diplomatic efforts aimed at reducing tensions and preventing further escalation.

Source link

 

These Are the Most Peaceful Countries With the Most Powerful Passports in 2026

0

Why Peace and Passport Strength Matter

These Are the Most Peaceful Countries With the Most Powerful Passports in 2026, offering citizens an exceptional combination of safety, political stability, high quality of life, and extensive visa-free travel. While a powerful passport allows travellers to visit many countries without a visa, living in a peaceful nation provides security, economic stability, and access to excellent healthcare and education.

Many of the world’s top-performing countries consistently rank highly in both the Global Peace Index (GPI) and global passport rankings. These nations have built strong institutions, low crime rates, and stable governments, making them attractive places to live, work, and travel.

In this article, we explore the countries that successfully combine peace with travel freedom and explain why these rankings matter.

A country’s passport strength is usually measured by the number of destinations its citizens can enter without obtaining a visa beforehand. A stronger passport makes international travel easier for tourism, business, education, and work.

Meanwhile, peaceful countries are evaluated using factors such as the following:

  • Low crime rates
  • Political stability
  • Internal security
  • Low levels of conflict
  • Respect for human rights
  • Strong legal systems
  • Economic stability

When these two qualities come together, citizens enjoy both domestic security and international mobility.


What Makes a Passport Powerful?

Passport rankings measure how many destinations you can visit:

  • Visa-free
  • Visa on arrival
  • Electronic Travel Authorization (eTA)

Countries whose citizens enjoy access to over 180 destinations are generally considered to have some of the world’s most powerful passports.

Strong diplomatic relationships and international cooperation play a major role in passport strength.


The Most Peaceful Countries With the Most Powerful Passports

1. Singapore

Singapore continues to rank among the world’s safest countries while holding one of the strongest passports globally.

Highlights

  • Visa-free access to more than 190 destinations
  • Extremely low crime rate
  • Excellent healthcare
  • Stable government
  • World-class infrastructure

Singapore combines economic strength with political stability, making it attractive to both residents and international investors.


2. Switzerland

Switzerland is known for neutrality, political stability, and exceptional living standards.

Highlights

  • Powerful passport
  • Low crime
  • Strong economy
  • High-quality healthcare
  • Beautiful natural landscapes

Its long-standing commitment to peace contributes to its consistently high rankings.


3. Japan

Japan remains one of the safest countries in Asia and continues to possess one of the world’s strongest passports.

Highlights

  • Very low violent crime
  • Advanced healthcare
  • Modern transportation
  • Excellent education
  • High life expectancy

Japanese passport holders enjoy extensive international travel opportunities.


4. Finland

Finland regularly ranks among the happiest and most peaceful nations.

Benefits include:

  • Clean environment
  • Excellent public services
  • Strong education system
  • High levels of trust
  • Powerful passport

Its stable society contributes significantly to its international reputation.


5. Denmark

Denmark offers citizens both security and exceptional travel freedom.

Reasons for its success include:

  • Transparent government
  • Low corruption
  • Excellent healthcare
  • Strong economy
  • High quality of life

6. Iceland

Despite its small population, Iceland consistently tops global peace rankings.

Advantages include:

  • Extremely low crime
  • Strong social welfare
  • Beautiful natural scenery
  • Stable democracy
  • Highly respected passport

7. Norway

Norway combines economic prosperity with social equality.

Key strengths:

  • Safe communities
  • Excellent education
  • Strong healthcare
  • Stable political system
  • Wide visa-free access

8. Sweden

Sweden continues to perform well across international quality-of-life rankings.

Citizens benefit from:

  • Strong public services
  • Environmental sustainability
  • Innovation
  • Political stability
  • Powerful travel document

9. New Zealand

New Zealand remains one of the world’s safest travel destinations.

It offers:

  • Peaceful society
  • Beautiful landscapes
  • Stable democracy
  • Friendly immigration policies
  • Strong passport ranking

10. Ireland

Ireland has become increasingly recognised for its peace and international mobility.

Advantages include:

  • Growing economy
  • Safe cities
  • Strong diplomatic relationships
  • High-quality education
  • Excellent travel access

Common Features Shared by These Countries

Although these countries differ in culture and geography, they share several characteristics:

  • Stable governments
  • Independent legal systems
  • Low corruption
  • Strong economies
  • Excellent healthcare
  • High educational standards
  • Respect for civil liberties
  • Good international relations

These factors help create both peaceful societies and internationally respected passports.


Why Travelers Value Powerful Passports

A powerful passport offers several practical advantages:

Easier International Travel

Fewer visa applications mean faster travel planning.

Lower Travel Costs

Visa fees can be high, especially for frequent travellers.

Better Business Opportunities

Business professionals benefit from easier access to international markets.

Educational Benefits

Students can attend conferences, exchange programmes, and universities with fewer travel barriers.

Emergency Flexibility

Citizens can often travel quickly during emergencies without lengthy visa procedures.


Peaceful Countries Also Attract Skilled Workers

Many peaceful nations actively welcome skilled professionals.

Popular industries include:

  • Healthcare
  • Engineering
  • Information Technology
  • Finance
  • Scientific Research
  • Renewable Energy

Their stable economies and high living standards make them attractive destinations for international talent.

How Rankings Can Change

Passport rankings and peace indexes are updated regularly. Changes may occur because of:

  • New visa agreements
  • Political developments
  • International conflicts
  • Diplomatic relations
  • Security improvements
  • Economic conditions

As a result, countries may move up or down in future rankings.


Conclusion

These Are the Most Peaceful Countries With the Most Powerful Passports because they combine political stability, low crime, strong economies, and excellent international relationships. Citizens of countries such as Singapore, Switzerland, Japan, Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, New Zealand, and Ireland enjoy both safe living environments and outstanding travel freedom.

For travellers, professionals, students, and businesses, these countries are among the best places in the world to live and explore. As global mobility and security continue to shape international opportunities, the combination of peace and passport strength will remain an important indicator of a nation’s overall quality of life.


Frequently Asked Questions

Which country has the most powerful passport in 2026?

Singapore is widely ranked among the countries with the strongest passports, offering visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to more than 190 destinations.

What is the Global Peace Index?

The Global Peace Index (GPI) measures how peaceful countries are using indicators such as safety, conflict levels, political stability, and militarisation.

Why is a powerful passport important?

A powerful passport allows easier international travel, reduces visa requirements, lowers travel costs, and improves opportunities for business and education.

Are peaceful countries always wealthy?

Not necessarily. While many peaceful countries have strong economies, governance, social stability, institutions, and low levels of conflict—not wealth alone—shape peace.



Source link

Rubio Attends ASEAN As Iran War Fuels Energy Security Fears

0



MANILA — US Secretary of State Marco Rubio arrived in Manila on July 21 for his first visit to the Philippines as America’s top diplomat, joining an Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) ministerial gathering overshadowed by renewed conflict with Iran and rising tensions in the South China Sea.

The visit comes as Washington seeks to reinforce its Indo-Pacific strategy and reassure regional allies amid crises stretching from the Middle East to Russia’s war against Ukraine.

Rubio said he was open to meeting both Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on the sidelines of ASEAN meetings, though no formal discussions had been confirmed before his arrival.

“I would never tell you guys in a press conference what we would raise in meetings like that. Those are delicate matters,” Rubio said before departing for Manila.

Shortly after Rubio landed, the US State Department underscored Washington’s focus on the South China Sea by issuing a sharply worded statement calling on Beijing to “immediately cease its destabilising conduct.”

The statement condemned China’s “dangerous and aggressive actions” against Philippine Navy personnel at Second Thomas Shoal, a disputed reef where a confrontation between the China Coast Guard and Philippine sailors on July 20 left a Philippine serviceman injured.

Energy Security

While Washington’s agenda will likely centre on China and the escalating conflict with Iran, the meetings are also taking place against the backdrop of other global crises, including Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Analysts interviewed by RFE/RL say Southeast Asian governments increasingly view those geopolitical challenges through the lens of energy security rather than military competition alone.

“The region is not choosing sides; it is diversifying its exposure,” Peter Cockcroft, director of the Asia-Pacific Net-Zero Institute and former strategic adviser to Philippine presidents, told RFE/RL. “A chokepoint crisis a thousand miles away has done more to concentrate ASEAN minds on energy security than a decade of US-China rivalry rhetoric.”

Cockcroft said that although Taiwan, the South China Sea, and military alliances remain important, governments across Southeast Asia are increasingly preoccupied with fuel prices, electricity costs, shipping routes, inflation, currency pressures, and domestic political stability.

“Energy security is becoming a decisive part of Southeast Asia’s strategic security,” he said. “The region is usually discussed through the lens of China, the South China Sea, Taiwan, military alliances, and freedom of navigation. Those issues remain important. However, Southeast Asian governments are equally concerned with fuel prices, electricity costs, shipping routes, foreign-exchange pressure, subsidies, inflation, and domestic political stability.”

That shift could complicate Rubio’s message in Manila.

While Washington is expected to reassure allies on security, many ASEAN governments are increasingly judging strategic partners by their ability to deliver energy affordability, resilient supply chains, and economic stability.

Iran Conflict Reshapes Strategic Calculations

The Iran conflict has become a defining factor in Southeast Asia’s strategic outlook, analysts say, exposing the region’s dependence on Middle Eastern energy and vulnerable shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz.

“The Hormuz crisis did not create ASEAN’s energy vulnerability — it exposed it,” Cockcroft said. The real question for finance ministries is not who they prefer strategically; it is who can guarantee that fuel and fertiliser keep arriving.

According to Cockcroft, the crisis is encouraging countries to diversify rather than forcing governments to choose between Washington and Beijing — seeking discounted Russian and Iranian energy where possible, expanding energy ties with China, and accelerating domestic energy development.

“ASEAN may discuss the crisis collectively, but each country absorbs and manages the consequences separately,” he said.

Before leaving for Manila, Rubio said that the US remained open to diplomacy with Tehran despite continued military operations. “Their behaviour has to change in order for ours to change,” Rubio said, while emphasising that Washington remained willing to negotiate.

Rubio also said that protecting global shipping should not fall solely on the US.

It was “not the United States’ job to protect shipping for the entire planet forever,” he said, urging other countries to contribute more resources toward maritime security.

Hedging Between Washington And Beijing

For some regional analysts, however, the Iran conflict is accelerating longer-term shifts already underway in Southeast Asia’s foreign policy.

Amid what he calls the “onslaught of fragmented globalisation”, Chester Cabalza, founder and president of the Manila-based International Development and Security Cooperation think tank, argues that the Iran crisis has “accelerated ASEAN’s hedging” between Washington and Beijing.

“The region survived the US-China trade war, only to be paralysed by total resource warfare,” he said, arguing that China’s sustained infrastructure investment through the Belt and Road Initiative has strengthened Beijing’s economic position while Washington has struggled to regain momentum.

“Washington’s delayed economic entry gave Beijing the perfect opportunity to integrate regional markets, leaving the US to scramble to catchup,” he said.

Cabalza added that energy security could ultimately “override Western geopolitical priorities in the region,” saying that “fuel over foreign policy will force Southeast Asian countries to realign with non-Western energy powers, including cheap Russian and Iranian energy as a political necessity.”

Similarly, Cockcroft said he expects ASEAN governments to show limited enthusiasm for expanding sanctions on Russian or Iranian energy, instead favouring pragmatic approaches that protect domestic economies, including alternative payment mechanisms and diversified energy supplies.

Possible Russia Talks

Russia’s war against Ukraine may also be discussed at ASEAN meetings, particularly as Rubio indicated he would be prepared to meet Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Manila if schedules allow.

The Kremlin has publicly welcomed the possibility of contact between the two diplomats during the gathering.

As ASEAN foreign ministers convene in Manila, analysts say the success of Rubio’s visit may depend not only on Washington’s security commitments but also on whether it can offer credible answers to Southeast Asia’s concerns over energy costs, inflation, supply-chain resilience, and economic stability.



Source link

Alejandro Garnacho transfer news.

0

Aston Villa are in talks to sign Alejandro Garnacho from Chelsea.

The proposal under discussion is a potential loan, but Chelsea want a permanent element attached to any deal for the winger.

Xabi Alonso admitted at his unveiling last week that Chelsea are working with the player and his representatives to find a solution that suits all parties.

Roma are also interested in signing Garnacho, while the former Manchester United winger also has admirers in the Saudi Pro League.

Garnacho has not returned to pre-season training as he seeks a resolution.

The deal comes after the two clubs negotiated a British record transfer fee of £117m for Morgan Rogers to go in the other direction.

Is Garnacho the right fit on the left for Aston Villa?

Analysis from Sky Sports’ Callum Bishop:

In a tough first season for Chelsea, Garnacho struggled to make much of an impact on an already overcrowded left-hand side. The Argentine managed just 1217 Premier League minutes across his 25 appearances last term, an average of less than 49 minutes per game.

That is less than both Morgan Rogers [1528] and Emiliano Buendia [1527] managed in the same position while sharing the workload off the left flank for Villa last season.

Their average returns were far superior too. Garnacho’s five goal involvements saw him average one every 243 minutes compared to Rogers’ record of a goal involvement every 90 minutes and Buendia’s of every 190.

Should Villa bring in Garnacho, it would surely mean a tweak in Unai Emery’s system when the Argentine is on the pitch.

With Buendia and Rogers, there is a versatility that not only sees them able to play on either flank but also shows a tendency to move inside.

Garnacho has operated on the right-hand side previously. He scored a goal in the FA Cup final win for Manchester United over local rivals City while operating from that flank. Cut inside though? That’s something you see far less from the winger.

His tendency is to hug the touchline and stay wide. In doing so, it would mean that Emery would need to be flexible with his attacking patterns, or Garnacho would have to show adaptability. Which is more likely?

Does Chelsea need to sell after the Rogers deal?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

 Aston Villa's Morgan Rogers.

Sky Sports’ Ron Walker explains how Chelsea can afford to pay £117m for Aston Villa’s Morgan Rogers.

Chelsea are Club World Cup champions. They have not always been world-class on the pitch during the BlueCo era but they have been world-class sellers.

They have already ensured enough outgoings this summer to cover the £117m cost of Rogers. Chelsea raised around £130m from selling players like Marc Cucurella, Andrey Santos and Tyrique George and the sizeable compensation from Man City for poaching Maresca certainly helped too.

The likes of Reece James, Palmer and Joao Pedro are considered untouchable assets, but other members of the first team squad will depart for sizeable fees – Garnacho, Nicolas Jackson and Trevoh Chalobah are likely to bring in another £100m if they go.

Malo Gusto is another player facing an uncertain future and Chelsea value him at an eye-watering £75m. Defenders Benoit Badiashile and Axel Disasi are also expected to go.

Despite not being in Europe this season, Chelsea will still be subjected to UEFA’s stricter financial rules. Last summer, Chelsea entered into a four-year settlement agreement with UEFA for breaching regulations and they’ll look to demonstrate progress in showcasing financial sustainability following this window.

Chelsea brought in around £300m from player sales last summer and given the need to move on a number of defenders who are surplus to requirements and at least one striker, it could be another impressive summer of trading.



Source link

Aid cuts prompt Malawi to rethink how it funds health.

0

Aid cuts prompt Malawi to rethink how it funds health as the country faces one of its biggest healthcare financing challenges in recent years. For decades, Malawi has relied heavily on international donors to support essential health services, including HIV treatment, malaria prevention, maternal healthcare, vaccination programmes, and medical supplies.

However, as foreign governments and international organisations reduce their aid budgets, Malawi must find new ways to finance its healthcare system. The shift represents not only a financial challenge but also an opportunity to build a stronger and more sustainable health system that relies less on external assistance. Recent reductions in bilateral aid from countries such as the UK, alongside wider declines in donor support, have increased pressure on Malawi’s government to expand domestic health financing.

Why Malawi Has Relied on Foreign Aid

Malawi is one of Africa’s lowest-income countries, and donor funding has played a major role in supporting its healthcare services for many years.

International organisations and development partners have funded the following:

  • HIV/AIDS treatment programs
  • Tuberculosis control
  • Malaria prevention campaigns
  • Childhood immunizations
  • Maternal and newborn healthcare
  • Medical equipment
  • Essential medicines
  • Training for healthcare workers

Without this assistance, many healthcare facilities would struggle to provide even basic services.

Aid has helped Malawi improve life expectancy, reduce child mortality, and increase access to lifesaving medicines. However, heavy dependence on external funding has also left the healthcare system vulnerable whenever donor priorities change.


Why Are Aid Budgets Being Reduced?

Many donor countries are now facing economic pressures at home.

Governments are redirecting spending toward:

  • Defence
  • Domestic healthcare
  • Inflation relief
  • National infrastructure
  • Debt reduction

These changing priorities mean international development budgets have become smaller.

Several countries have already announced significant reductions in overseas aid, affecting many African nations, including Malawi.


The Immediate Impact on Malawi’s Health Sector

Reduced funding creates several serious challenges.

Healthcare facilities may experience the following:

  • Medicine shortages
  • Delays in vaccine deliveries
  • Fewer outreach health programs
  • Reduced HIV prevention services
  • Staff shortages
  • Limited maternal healthcare
  • Reduced disease surveillance

Communities in rural areas will feel the greatest impact, as many clinics rely heavily on donor-funded programmes.

Health experts warn that interruptions in essential services could increase preventable illnesses and place additional pressure on hospitals.


Malawi’s Response: Increasing Domestic Health Financing

Rather than relying solely on international donors, Malawi is now exploring ways to raise more money within the country.

Possible strategies include:

Increasing Government Health Spending

Officials are considering allocating a larger share of the national budget to healthcare.

Civil society organisations have also urged Parliament to move closer to the 15% health spending target set out in the Abuja Declaration, noting that current allocations remain below that level.

Improving Tax Collection

Better tax administration could generate additional revenue for public services, including health.

Health-Specific Taxes

Some experts support increasing taxes on products such as the following:

  • Tobacco
  • Alcohol
  • Sugary drinks

These “health taxes” can both improve public health and generate additional funding.

Expanding Health Insurance

Developing affordable health insurance programmes may help to reduce pressure on government spending over time.

Challenges Ahead

Replacing donor funding will take time.

Malawi continues to face several economic difficulties, including the following:

  • High inflation
  • Rising public debt
  • Foreign currency shortages
  • Slow economic growth
  • Limited government revenue

The country is also working with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on economic reforms that could help stabilise public finances while protecting essential social spending.


Building a More Sustainable Healthcare System

Many policy experts believe the current situation provides an opportunity for long-term reform.

Potential improvements include the following:

Better Financial Management

Reducing waste and improving transparency can help us use existing funds more efficiently.

Strengthening Primary Healthcare

Investing in local clinics reduces pressure on major hospitals.

Digital Health Systems

Electronic patient records and improved health information systems can reduce costs while improving patient care.

Local Manufacturing

Producing medicines and medical supplies within the country could reduce dependence on imports.

Public-Private Partnerships

Working with private healthcare providers may help expand services while sharing costs.


The Role of International Partners

Although aid budgets are shrinking, international organisations will remain important partners.

Rather than funding routine healthcare indefinitely, future support may increasingly focus on:

  • Technical expertise
  • Disease surveillance
  • Emergency response
  • Training healthcare workers
  • Research
  • Digital healthcare systems

This approach encourages countries to build stronger national systems while still benefiting from global cooperation.


What This Means for Ordinary Malawians

For citizens, these changes may lead to both short-term difficulties and long-term opportunities.

In the short term, people could experience:

  • Longer waiting times
  • Medicine shortages
  • Reduced outreach services
  • Pressure on hospitals

Over the longer term, successful reforms could create:

  • More reliable healthcare funding
  • Greater financial independence
  • Better management of health services
  • Improved healthcare quality
  • Stronger national resilience

Looking Ahead

The decision to rethink healthcare financing marks a decisive moment for Malawi.

Although reduced foreign aid creates immediate financial pressure, it also encourages the country to strengthen domestic funding, improve financial management, and develop a more resilient healthcare system.

Success will depend on careful planning, responsible budgeting, stronger tax collection, continued economic reforms, and effective partnerships with international organisations.

If these reforms are implemented successfully, Malawi could emerge with a healthcare system that is more sustainable, more efficient, and better prepared to meet future health challenges—even with less reliance on external donors.


Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Malawi rethinking its healthcare funding?

Because international aid is declining, the government needs to find more sustainable ways to finance healthcare services.

Which healthcare services are most affected?

Funding reductions may most affect programmes that support HIV/AIDS, malaria, maternal healthcare, vaccinations, and essential medicines.

Can Malawi replace foreign aid completely?

Not immediately. However, Malawi can gradually reduce dependence on external aid by increasing domestic revenue, improving tax collection, expanding health insurance, and enhancing spending efficiency.

What role does the IMF play?

The IMF is discussing a potential financing programme with Malawi that is linked to economic reforms aimed at restoring stability while safeguarding priority social spending.

Source link

Mary Steenbergen says she’s made peace with the biggest ‘mistake’ of her career

0
Mary Steenbergen says she is not “haunt” Because of the roles she missed. Warner Bros. TV/Getty Images

Mary Steenbergen says she once took the role she should have taken.

She says she does not regret it because her choices have given her the life she has today.

“It’s impossible to imagine how different my life would be,” he said.

Mary Steenbergen, 73, says she is not upset about the roles she has lost because they led her to the life she has now.

Speaking on Saturday’s episode of The Daily Beast “Obsessed” Podcast, the actor said he made “a big mistake” in his career by playing a role that he “probably should have done.”

Steenbergen said she would “never tell anyone” that it was out of respect for the actor who ultimately got the role. However, looking back, she doesn’t really regret her decision because changing that one choice could have changed the direction of her life, she said.

Steenbergen said, “I know someone who is very influenced by the roles that other people – including myself – get, and I feel terrible for this person, because for whatever reason, I am free from it.” “I always have been.”

He said that his “weird spirituality” has led him to believe that everything happens for a reason, including the roles he thought he was supposed to accept.

Steenbergen said, “The truth is I really don’t think I should have done it, because if I had done that, I probably wouldn’t have met Ted and then Kate and Alexis wouldn’t be my stepdaughters.” “It’s impossible to imagine all the ways my life would be different.”

Steenbergen married actor Ted Danson in 1995.

He has a blended family, with two children each from a previous marriage.

Steenbergen said that rather than focusing on other people’s success, she finds joy in watching actors she admire perform brilliantly.

“I feel sorry for people who don’t feel the same way,” he said. “This is not a competitive sport. You’re in this together.”

Steenbergen said she takes a similar approach regarding films that did not perform as she expected.

He always found something meaningful in the projects he worked on, he said, whether it was lifelong friendships, a lesson he learnt, or memories he made with his children.

Steenbergen said, “I’ve made really good movies, and some of them are good occasionally, but I’ve also made some turkeys, and I’m glad I made them.”

Other actors have also said they are at peace with missing out on career-defining roles.

Before Margot Robbie became Barbie, Anne Hathaway was attached to an earlier version of the film. In the presence of the 2023 “Happy, Sad, Confused” podcast, Hathaway said she views it as a “lucky thing” that never happened because it made way for the version that audiences ultimately fell in love with.

Hathaway said, “He was exactly right. And the whole world reached this level of ecstasy because of that eye. Now imagine that version – so much energy, so much anticipation, so much emotion – but that’s not the right version.”

Cillian Murphy almost got the role of Batman in Christopher Nolan’s trilogy before it went to Christian Bale. In 2023, he told GQ it was “for the best.”

Murphy said, “I never considered myself the perfect physical model for Batman. For me, it was always Christian Bale.”

Make sure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google searches by adding us as a favourite source. Click here to activate. Or add us as your preferred source to your Google Search settings



Source link

Americans love this terrible idea to fix Congress.

0

Congress is disconnected from the public. It needs fresh blood. There should be a term limit. right?

Congressional term limits are one of the most supported policy ideas. According to the 2023 Pew Research Center, 9 in 10 Americans support this idea. study. Other polls back up this finding. As a result, lawmakers have introduced several bills to amend the constitution and limit the number of terms in and among the Senate to two. Three To Six In the house

But the idea, if implemented, would cripple an already ineffective Congress.

First, while Americans may like the idea of ​​term limits, their view of Congress has no bearing on how long lawmakers serve.

Take, for example, the 97th session of Congress, which began in 1981. Its legislators were notably green. According to data compiled by the Daily Kos from the Congressional Research Service, the average years of service at the start of this session were 7.3 in the House and 7.5 in the Senate. He ranks as the shortest average tenure in each chamber from the 1950s to the present. The average approval rating for this session was 33.5%. Gallup Data

Meanwhile, the 100th Congress, which began in 1987, was on average more experienced—9.0 years in the House and 9.6 years in the Senate—and had a higher average approval rating at 42.0%.

A broader look at history shows little correlation between a legislature’s tenure and popular approval of Congress.

In the 10 most recent sessions of Congress, the average years of service have been 9.2 in the House and 11.0 in the Senate, nearly identical to the previous 10 sessions (8.9 years in the House, 10.9 in the Senate). However, Congress’s average approval rating over the 10 most recent sessions has been just 19.5%, less than half of what it was over the previous 10 sessions (40.0% average).

Break the last 25 sessions into five-session chunks and you get the same very low correlation. For example, the five sessions beginning in the 100th and the five sessions beginning in the 115th have essentially the same average years of service in both chambers—but Congress’s average approval rating is 10 points lower for the latter five sessions.

Of course, there are countless examples of long-serving, out-of-touch politicians: your Mitch McConnell, your Chucks Grassley and Schumer. There is no doubt that these are the types of politicians Americans are imagining when they say they want term limits (or maximum age limits, which are not currently available in American politics and are beyond the scope of this article).

But who will replace them? Democrats may have a somewhat promising start, but on the Republican side, new lawmakers tend to be more enthusiastically MAGA — and alienating to most Americans. Do not support that movement.

Experienced legislators are also generally more effective when it comes to making laws. Finally, becoming a member of Congress is a job, and like all jobs, experience matters.

Green legislators tend to trust more experienced colleagues and lobbyists too much, as both often possess a profound understanding of policymaking. Remove these veteran lawmakers from the equation and Congress’ dependence on special interest groups is likely to increase.

Worse, if legislators know they have only a handful of terms, they have fewer reasons to learn how to be effective.

Representative Joaquin Castro of Texas, shown in 2023, was ranked as the most effective House Democrat of the 118th Congress. Under the outstanding term limits law, he will no longer serve.A.P

“[W] If you limit someone, you’re effectively removing their incentive to invest in learning how to do the job, to explore policy issues in the depth they need to and how the process works, which only takes years,” said Casey Burgett, director of the Legislative Affairs Program at George Washington University’s Graduate School of Management and Political Management. told NPR in 2023. There is no training programme.

By their very nature, term limits automatically terminate effective legislatures. Representative Joaquin Castro of Texas was the most effective legislative House Democrat in the 118th Congress. Study from the Center for Effective Legislation. Despite Castro being a member of a minority party, “his style of working behind the scenes – to compromise and insert his bill language into other legislative vehicles – shows more opportunities for minority-party lawmakers to succeed in Congress”, the study said.

Even the most generous legislation, with a six-term maximum in the House, would have barred him from running for his seat in 2024. He was first elected in 2012.

In fact, the six-term maximum would have now removed six of the most legislatively effective House Democrats in the 118th Congress. Oh, three: the duration limit would have booted all but one. In total, the average tenure of those 10 most effective Democrats is more than 17 years. Turns out, experience is very valuable.

The same is true in the Senate. In the 118th Congress, 6 of the 10 most legislatively effective Democratic senators have served or are serving more than two terms—the usual maximum in term-limit legislation. The two-term maximum would have barred Jon Tester, the Senate’s fourth-most effective Democrat in the 118th session, from running for and winning re-election in 2018 in GOP-friendly Montana. As it is, Tester raced, won and produced results.

There are several other problems with term limits. Studies show that promoting political polarisation appears to be an obstacle to economic development.

“To the extent that we are concerned about perverse electoral incentives and poorly performing institutions, there are potentially better solutions and reforms that do not sacrifice desirable aspects of electoral accountability,” said Anthony Fowler, professor of public policy at the University of Chicago. concluded in a 2024 review of research on term limits.

Meanwhile, there is at least one better solution to increasing electoral accountability and productivity in Congress. It likewise enjoys a high level of public support. There is no need for constitutional amendment for this.

Ban gerrymandering.

Any updates?

  • Democratic candidates in House and Senate races are outperforming in polls across the country, with at least one exception. In Washington’s 3rd District, Democratic Rep Mary Glossenkamp Perez is leading Republican challenger John Brown by 1 percentage point, according to a new survey from Emerson College and the Northwest Progressive Institute, despite Brown’s previous win in 2022. Survey from Emerson College and Northwest Progressive Institute. Gluesenkamp Perez nearly won in 2024, by 4 points. However, 11 per cent of likely voters are undecided, and the poll’s margin of error of 4 points means a Gluesenkamp-Perez win is possible. Still, for Democrats, poindicateshow that none of the seats are competitive this year.
  • Call it the trickle-down statistic: Trump is unpopular, and so is every member of his cabinet. A new one, Poll: Not a single current member of Trump’s cabinet has a net positive approval rating, according to YouGov. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the top-performing cabinet lackey, had a net approval rating of -3 points. In a three-way tie for last place, each with a net approval rating of -16 points, are Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, Secretary of Defence Pat Hegseth, and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanch.

Check the vibe

In lieu of our regularly scheduled vibe check this week, I’d like to pay tribute to Dennis Oliver Wells, who passed away on Wednesday. Since I started at Daily Kos in 2023, I have had the honour of editing many of its “Caribbean Matters” and “Black Music Sunday” columns. They have introduced me to neglected issues and wonderful tunes. I will be forever grateful for that.

Many people in the Daily Kos community knew her far better than I did, and if you’re one of them, my thoughts are with you.



Source link

Spain vs Argentina Player Ratings:

0

Spain beat Argentina 1-0 in the most one-sided World Cup final in history. From Ferran Torres’ heroics to Lionel Messi’s last dance, here are the player ratings as claimed by Luis de la Fuente as his second star…

Spain

Yonai Simon – 5

Argentina had literally no shots until the 117th minute. Maybe you got a nice tan and definitely got your hands on the trophy.

Pedro Porro – 8

Lamine Yamal was a constant threat to score runs. It was his cross that finally sparked the opener – a crucial delivery to Williams at the back post.

Pau Cuberci – 6

Played with maturity beyond his years. There wasn’t much to stop the Argentine, but they were consistently calm whenever a threat appeared. World Cup Winner and Young Player of the Tournament.

Aymeric Laporte – 6

There was nothing to do defensively. A half chance came late on in normal time, but he couldn’t get enough purchase with his header.

Mark Cucorella – 7

Just like at the Euros two years ago, Cucurella has raised his stock this summer and followed it up with another fine performance at both ends of the pitch.

Rhodri – 7

The midfield general. The game kept ticking in Spain’s favour. He was brought on in extra time, which is understandable given his injury history and the fact that playing more than 90 minutes would have been a risk.

Fabian Ruiz – 6

89 per cent pass completion and two chances created. A solid if unremarkable performance from the PSG man before being subbed off after just an hour.

Lamin emal – 5

Was it the day he took the crown from King Macy? Absolutely not. The teenage superstar was targeted and kept quiet, but he will accept the results when they come.

Image:
Lamine Yamal and Lionel Messi embrace after the World Cup final.

Dani Olmo – 5

For all Spain’s possessions, it didn’t quite happen for Olmo. Honestly, there wasn’t much happening in front of him, so it was hard to make an impact.

Alex Bina – 5

Whether it was Montel or Molina, the Argentine right winger was available. Bina works well with Cucorella, but bringing in Williams to add more momentum is a sensible move.

Mikel Owersball – 6

He was the only one in trouble for Martinez in the first half, but as is so often the case, he was sacrificed so Spain could step up with an alternative approach.

Subs

Ferran Torres – 8

A moment he will never forget. It was a truly stunning piece of harmony and quality when it mattered most. His teammates struggled to show it, but Ferran Torres had it in abundance. To forever be the man who won the 2026 World Cup.

Please consider using the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.

Spain

Ferran Torres scored a crucial extra-time goal to give Spain a 1-0 lead in the World Cup final against Argentina.

Padre – 6

He looked smart on the ball and brought a little more energy than Fabian Ruiz in midfield.

Mikel Merino – 5

His moment looked like it came in extra time when he got on the end of a cross just outside the six-yard box. Nate should have risen, but Super Sab missed his mark and his chance to be a hero.

Nico Williams – 7

The substitute was brought on to make an impact and thought he had done so when he provided the ball for the extra-time opener, only for it to be controversially ruled out. However, he grabbed the assist for his moment’s winner, forcing a nod towards Torres.

Please consider using the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.

fan

Spanish and Argentinian fans react to Nico Williams’ goal, which was disallowed early on for a foul on Nicolas Otamendi.

Martin Zobemendi – 5

Half of his playing time was spent doing things he wasn’t brought in to do as Argentina pressed for a late equaliser. He wasn’t at Rodri’s level, but he provided fresh legs at an important time.

Eric Garcia – 6

Argentina were throwing the kitchen sink at Spain, and Garcia added an extra defensive body to see out the game.

Argentina

Amy Martinez – 8

He started convincingly, but as the game progressed, Martinez became more subdued. There were many straightforward saves that he rattled off. He recovered his composure though, making key saves to keep Argentina in it late on and into extra time. Unfortunately, it wasn’t enough for him.

Argentina's players look frustrated after Ferran Torres' success for Spain.
Image:
Argentina’s players look frustrated after Ferran Torres’ success for Spain.

Gonzalo Montel – 5

He struggled to get forward and often couldn’t keep up with Cucurella’s overlapping movement down the other end. He did nothing during his World Cup-winning moment four years ago.

Cristian Romero – 6

Had to defend a lot, and with Martinez coming on just before half-time, he and Otamendi worked well together for the most part before limping off on 70 minutes.

Lisandro Martinez – 4

Perhaps a bit harsh, as he did nothing wrong but received a booking and was injured before half-time.

Nicholas Tagliafico – 6

Marshalled Lamine Yamal about it as well as he could. The youngster certainly didn’t do anything remarkable, which is a testament to the Argentine left-back.

Rodrigo De Paul – 5

He struggled to get a grip on the midfield battle against Rodri and Ruiz.

Alexis McAllister – 5

The rest sat back, as the Argentine was unable to show what he had in his possession. His approach to the game rather than his individual efforts hindered him.

Enzo Fernandez – 2

His absolutely idiotic stoppage-time tackle on Cubbery, who had already been booked for talking to the referee, left his team in a terrible position in extra time. They were already under the cosh; it just worsened it.

He has no hands on his ears after that.

Referee Slavko Vincic of Slovenia gives Argentina's Enzo Fernandez (24) a red card as Spain's Pedro Poro (12) looks on during the World Cup final soccer match between Spain and Argentina, Sunday, July 19, 2026, in East Rutherford, NJ, near New York.
Image:
Enzo Fernandez’s reaction to World Cup final exit

Nico Gonzalez – 6

Indeed, he looked a threat when he chanced to carry the ball forward but was withdrawn at half-time as Argentina looked far more defensively settled.

Lionel Messi – 4

If this is the end of Lionel Messi, it was not what he would have dreamt of. It didn’t impact the game nearly as much as expected, but what a tournament it was. What a player.

The picture of him sitting on the floor, defeated, may be the last picture of him on a football pitch for all we know. If so, he walks away with his head held high, even if he can’t find another moment in magical history.

Argentina's Lionel Messi looks on during the World Cup final (AP Photo/Abby Parr)
Image:
Lionel Messi was unable to find his magic spark last time out.

Julian Alvarez – 3

Argentina played a defensive game, and Alvarez could not get involved. He was replaced by a centre-half in extra time, which tells you all you need to know about how Lionel Scaloni was approaching the game.

Subs

Nicolas Otamendi – 6

A veteran name was brought in for possibly one last dance. Led the defence fairly well until the inevitable happened.

Leandro Paredes – 2

Shocking. He came on, fouled, did nothing positive and then carried himself so badly that he got a red card after the final whistle. He should be ashamed of himself.

Nahuel Molina – 3

Beaten at the back post by Williams to set up Torres’ winner. He then punched Rodri, sparking ugly scenes at full-time as he took to the pitch to celebrate with his team-mates. A sore loser might be trying to get out of his role in an expensive cause.

Facundo Medina – 5

Medina couldn’t do much to stop the Spanish attack, but he was one of the defenders on the pitch when he eventually scored.

Giuliano Simeone – 5

He kicked his socks off after coming on but will always rue his lack of extra time in stoppage time. He would see his name in lights when the ball landed at his feet in a corner. Instead, he fired his half-volley over the bar.

Marcos Senisi – 5

Senisi put in some decent tackles, but his introduction in place of Alvarez was a classic Thomas Tuchel move. He condemned Argentina for trying to hold him back – before conceding – and perhaps wished he had stopped another attacker.

Player of the Match: Ferran Torres

Ferran Torres celebrates scoring his opener in extra time
Image:
Ferran Torres celebrates scoring his opener in extra time

Rate the players!

Have your say on who stole the show using our interactive tool…



Source link

U.S. Military Deaths Rise After Death in Jordan,

0



US Central Command (CENTCOM) said a service member was killed following an Iranian drone attack in Jordan, adding to the two deaths disclosed earlier in iraq, where the discovery of unidentified remains raised the possibility of a fourth fatality in the past three days.

“A US service member in northern Iraq was killed in action July 18 during a controlled detonation of unexploded ordnance from a downed Iranian one-way attack drone. A second service member was wounded and continues to receive medical treatment for a minor injury,” CENTCOM said on July 19.

A day earlier, CENTCOM had disclosed the first combat losses in the Iran war since March, saying two service members had been killed and another was missing during defensive operations in Jordan as hostilities ramped up in the region and further endangered a fragile cease-fire.

In its latest statement, the military said that “after a thorough search, US military personnel found unidentified remains at the location earlier today [in Jordan]. An examination process to verify the remains is ongoing, raising the possibility that they belong to the missing service member.

That statement did not specify where in Jordan the attack occurred. Identification of the victims was not provided pending notification of family members.

The main site of US operations on the territory of the Middle East ally is the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, about 80 kilometres outside Amman. US forces also have operations at the Prince Hassan Air Base and at other military facilities in Jordan.

The Wall Street Journal and others, citing sources, reported that the strike occurred at the Muwaffaq Salti base, which US forces have used to launch air strikes against Iran.

US President Donald Trump told the NewsNation network that the deaths were “sorrowful. It’s a sorrowful thing.”

“We hate to see it happen. It’s in service to our country,” he said in a brief interview. On July 19, Trump was attending the World Cup final in the US state of New Jersey.

Jordan Condemns Iran

⁠Jordan, ⁠on July 19, summoned Iran’s representative in Amman to protest Tehran’s missile and drone strikes on the Middle Eastern nation, labelling them “brutal and unjustified.”

The CENTCOM statement did not provide further details on the fatality in Iraq.

US forces remain operating in Iraq for training and anti-terror purposes, although numbers are down significantly from the 170,000 at the height of the Iraq war. US and Iraqi officials have said that US troops will fully depart in September.

The newly reported deaths bring the total of known fatalities among US military personnel since the start of the US-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28 to 17, with all but one listed as combat deaths. The total does not include the missing service member in Jordan.

On March 1, a drone hit a command centre in Kuwait, killing six service members.

On March 8, a US soldier was killed during an attack on the Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia.

On March 12, a plane crashed in western Iraq, killing six members of a refuelling aircraft.

A Navy pilot also died in what officials described as a noncombat incident when a helicopter crashed in the Arabian Sea in early July.

In Iran, meanwhile, recent attacks on the country had killed 50 people and injured more than 500. The report could not be independently verified.

US forces as of July 19 had launched eight straight nights of air strikes against Iran, mostly focusing on the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran has attempted to control the strait by firing on vessels that it says have not received proper permission.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said four ships attempted to transit the strait without its approval and that two “had an accident and were stopped in place. ” The claim could not be verified.

Iran continued to launch attacks on July 19, striking out at US Gulf Arab allies in retaliation for US air strikes, which the Pentagon said were in response to Tehran’s violation of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed by both sides.

Joint Israeli-Jordanian Effort Reported

The Israeli military told AFP that Israeli and Jordanian forces had intercepted an Iranian missile aimed at the Jordanian city of Aqaba.

The Jordanian military said it had downed “three Iranian missiles that targeted the kingdom’s territory”, without specifying the location.

The Gulf state of Kuwait, meanwhile, said Iran struck a power and water plant, igniting flames.

It was the third attack in as many days on such a facility in Kuwait, while authorities said an oil site had been hit the day before.



Source link