Home Blog Page 71

Ukraine plots revenge as Russia plans to raise more than 400,000 new troops

1

As Kremlin war chiefs scramble to mobilise nearly half a million troops by 2026, Ukrainian commanders have declared they will fight Russia to defend against brutal attacks.

Kiev's military rolls Sumy, a T-72 tank, close to the Russian border

Ukrainian soldiers with a Soviet-era T-72 tank in the Sumy region near Russia

Ukraine has vowed to step up attacks on Russia, as the Kremlin plans to mobilise more than 400,000 new troops for the front lines. It comes in the wake of Kiev’s wave of successful attacks on Russia over the weekend and continued successes in destroying Kremlin oil installations.

But Kremlin war chiefs have ordered the creation of 11 new divisions this year to stem the consequences of their bloody war on Ukraine. The total number of Russian troops to be mobilised in 2026 rises to 409,000, with the possibility of more reinforcements from North Korea.

But new attacks on Russian soil mean Kiev’s war planners will attack Russia on its home turf to divert vital troops from the front. Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Oleksandr Sirsky said, “We understand that you cannot win a war by defence alone.

“That’s why we will launch an aggressive campaign and fight to retain the initiative. Of course they plan to increase their power.”

Determined: Kyiv's top commander Oleksandr Sirsky

Commander Oleksandr Sirsky – War on Russia (Image: Chief Directorate of Communications)

read more: : Keir Starmer press conference live – PM hits out at Donald Trump’s ‘trade war’ threat read more: : Donald Trump makes terrifying threat to NATO ally over Greenland – entire letter

He intends to create at least 11 divisions and recruit approximately 409,000 personnel. He said Ukraine would continue strategic defensive operations as well as offensive operations to maintain the operational initiative.

Russia has suffered heavy losses in the past four-year war over Ukraine.

Russia has suffered heavy losses in the past four-year war over Ukraine, with more than a million soldiers killed and wounded. Ukraine has also succeeded in severely reducing Russia’s war chest provided by oil exports while impacting the ability of local authorities to warn citizens during the bitter winter season.

    Volodymyr Zelensky, UK's Keir Starmer, France's Emmanuel Macron

Coalition: Volodymyr Zelensky, UK’s Keir Starmer, France’s Emmanuel Macron (Image: Getty Images) )

Amazingly, some battlefields have claimed the lives of up to 1,000 Russian soldiers a day as commanders demand full-frontal assaults that have become suicide missions. Thousands of North Korean soldiers have been killed, particularly in the Russian Kursk region, out of more than 10,000 sent by Pyongyang.

But frontline officials have also complained about defective weapons, explosives and ammunition sent by Pyongyang that have malfunctioned and do not work. Russia also lost 11,573 tanks, 36,333 artillery weapons, more than 23,000 armoured vehicles, 434 warplanes, 347 helicopters and 28 warships in the fighting.

Ukrainian special forces launched a sabotage campaign, seriously damaging several Kremlin submarines. And Syrsky argues that Russia is failing in its attempt to invade Ukraine, having made too little progress and capturing too small pieces of land.

He said last week: “We did not allow the enemy to achieve significant successes, disrupted his plans and repeatedly forced him to postpone the dates of planned operations.” During 2025, Russian commanders captured approximately 2,000 square miles of Ukrainian territory, deploying 600,000–700,000 combat troops into Ukraine, primarily using infantry-heavy short-range attack tactics.

That land area represents a little less than one per cent of Ukraine, which is slightly larger than the English county of Norfolk. This cost Moscow about five lakh soldiers.

He added, “This year proved we are able to systematically eliminate the enemy and significantly reduce his potential. The defence forces did not allow the aggressor to implement his plans, preserved strategic positions and prepared the ground for further operations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.”

Source link

Sir Keir Starmer states that a trade war “is not the right way to resolve our differences” in the context of political news.

1



Sir Keir Starmer has said that a trade war is “not the right way to resolve differences” within the coalition.

During the Downing Street press conference on the Greenland crisis, the Prime Minister appeared to rule out the possibility of imposing retaliatory tariffs on the US.

Politics Live: What will Britain do next on Greenland?

It came as Donald Trump threatened Britain and other European countries with 10% tariffs on all goods from February, rising to 25% from June, unless Washington reaches a deal to buy the self-autonomous Danish island.

Sir Keir said using tariffs against allies was “completely wrong” and “not the right way to resolve differences”.

However, when asked by Sky News’ Political Editor Beth Rigg if he is planning retaliatory tariffs, Sir Keir said, “A tariff war is in nobody’s interests and so what I want to do is avoid a tariff war because businesses, workers and families across the country will be hit by a trade war.”

He said he would speak with European allies and Mr Trump, adding, “We have to find a practical, sensible, sustained way through this that avoids some consequences that will be very serious for our country.”

The US president has not ruled out military action to achieve his goal of seizing Greenland, which he seeks because of its strategic Arctic location and mineral wealth.

Sir Keir said he did not think Mr. Trump was really considering that option, telling reporters, “I think it can and should be resolved through peaceful discussion.”

Britain has insisted that the US should play no role in Greenland’s future, echoing Europe’s position.

Read more:
The misconception could pose a threat to Trump.
Starmer started retaliating against Trump

In an announcement Saturday night, Mr. Trump said tariffs “on any and all goods” shipped to the US would hit the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Finland.

Sir Keir responded to the issue by stating that the decision was “completely wrong.”

 

Sir Keir responded to the issue by saying that the decision was “completely wrong” and reiterated his position that Greenland’s future is “a matter for Greenlanders and Danes”.

 

The prime minister’s spokesman said he also told Mr Trump in a subsequent phone call on Sunday that the tariffs were wrong.

However, at a press conference on Monday, Sir Keir insisted that the US “remains a close ally.”

He said, “The US remains a close ally in defence, security, intelligence, and nuclear capabilities.” We have worked very closely with the United States, and we should never forget our national interest in this.”

“But we must stand up for our values. We must be clear about the principles we are applying here, and we will continue to do so on the tariff question.



Source link

Trump escalates Greenland standoff with allies, linking it to alleged Nobel Peace Prize snub

1

America’s European allies united on Monday against President Trump’s escalating campaign to annex Greenland. They accused him of blackmailing them with new tariff threats if they continue to reject the US’s bid to acquire the huge island. Meanwhile, Mr Trump appeared to signal that he was still willing to use the US military to achieve his aims.

In a message sent to Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Storey and shared with other NATO allies, Mr Trump stated that due to the decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to someone other than himself this year, he no longer feels “an obligation to think purely about peace.” And he “can now think about what is good and right for the United States.”

In the next sentence, Mr Trump mentions his controversial demand that the US take ownership of Greenland, which has been the territory of Denmark, a US ally, for centuries. He renewed his claim that only complete American control could prevent strategic Arctic islands from falling into the hands of China or Russia.

Trump’s claims regarding Greenland and American security

America’s closest allies in NATO, as well as US lawmakers, have rejected Mr Trump’s argument on both sides of the aisle that America needs ownership of Greenland for security reasons.

Highly detailed political map of North America. All layers were separable and labeled. vector

 

He noted that Greenland is already protected by the transatlantic alliance as a Danish territory, the US has maintained at least one military base on the island since World War II, and Denmark has extended an open invitation to Washington to enhance that defence presence in collaboration with its allies.

Despite those facts, Denmark and other European NATO members have made efforts to demonstrate their understanding and willingness to address the growing competition for control of important new shipping lanes around the resource-rich island. In his message to the Norwegian leader, Mr. Trump again claimed that “the world is not safe until we have complete and total control of Greenland.”

They argue that Denmark is unable to secure the Arctic region in the face of Russian and Chinese threats – a threat echoed by Senator Mark Warner, the Democratic vice chair of the US Senate Intelligence Committee. is called imaginary Over the weekend.

“Denmark cannot defend that land from Russia or China,” Mr Trump wrote, ignoring the fact that, for nearly 80 years, ever since the United States and its European allies committed to the principle of joint security with NATO’s founding treaty, Greenland’s security has been a shared responsibility.

In the note, Mr Trump, as he has done before, questioned Denmark’s right to any claim on Greenland, arguing that the basis for it was simply that “a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, but we also had boats land there.”

Denmark became the colonial power in Greenland in the early 18th century, about 50 years before the United States became a sovereign nation with its navy. Greenland remained a Danish colony until 1953, when the island received its current semi-autonomy.

Protesters rally in Greenland against Trump's threat of occupation

Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen waves a flag during a protest against President Trump’s demand to hand over the Arctic island to the US in Nuuk, Greenland, on January 17, 2026.

 

Marco Jurica/Reuters

 

Greenland has a small population of about 60,000, but its leaders and citizens have made it clear that they don’t want to join the US.

Norway’s leader responded to Trump’s message

The Norwegian government shared a statement on Monday from Prime Minister Store in which he confirmed that he received Mr Trump’s message on Sunday afternoon.

He said it came in response to a text message he sent with Finnish President Alexander Stubb.

“In our message to Trump, we expressed our protest over his announced tariff increases against Norway, Finland and select other countries,” Storey said in a statement. “We described the need to de-escalate tensions and proposed a telephone conversation between Trump, Stubbs and me that same day. Shortly after sending the message, Trump responded. “He said it was Mr. Trump’s decision “to share his message with other NATO leaders.”

NATO leaders at the summit

NATO leaders attend the North Atlantic Council Plenary Meeting at a summit in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25, 2025.

 

“Norway’s position on Greenland is clear. Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and Norway fully supports Denmark in this matter. We also support that NATO is taking responsible steps to strengthen security and stability in the Arctic,” Storey said.

He further said, “As far as the Nobel Peace Prize is concerned, I have clearly explained to everyone, including President Trump, what is well known: that the prize is awarded by an independent Nobel Committee and not by the government of Norway.”

British leader suspects Trump will use US military to occupy Greenland

Mr. Trump surprised America’s NATO allies over the weekend by threatening to impose new tariffs on Denmark and seven other European countries if they continue to reject his demands to annex Greenland.

After meeting among themselves on Sunday, the eight countries issued a joint statement saying they were “committed to strengthening Arctic security as a shared transatlantic interest” while reiterating their support for Denmark and Greenland.

He said they are ready to engage in negotiations “based on the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity behind which we stand firmly” and warned that threats of tariffs “undermine transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous deterioration.”

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has maintained a good relationship with Mr Trump and spoke to him by phone on Sunday, acknowledged in televised comments on Monday morning that the Arctic region will need greater attention, greater investment, and a stronger collective defence. He said the US would be at the centre of that effort, and the UK stands ready to contribute fully to our allies through NATO.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer lays out approach to US after Trump tariff threat

On January 19, 2026, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer attended a press conference in London, England.

 

“But there is a principle here that cannot be sidelined, because it depends on how stable and reliable international cooperation is, and therefore any decision about the future status of Greenland belongs to the people of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark alone,” Starmer said.

“Denmark is a close ally of the UK and the US – a proud NATO member that has stood shoulder to shoulder with us in recent decades, including at very real human cost,” Starmer said, pointing to Danish troops fighting alongside US and British forces in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of the NATO alliance.

He said, “Alliances last because they are built on respect and partnership, not coercion. That’s why I said using tariffs against allies is completely wrong. Such an approach is not the right way to resolve differences within the alliance, nor is it helpful to frame efforts to strengthen Greenland’s security as a justification for economic pressure.” “A trade war is in no one’s interest.”

Regarding Mr. Trump’s consideration of using US forces to seize territory from the NATO ally, Starmer said he believed that would not happen.

“Actually, I don’t do that,” he said. “I think this can and should be resolved through a calm discussion, but with the application of the principles I have set out in terms of who gets to decide the future of Greenland.”



Source link

Missing sisters, ages 16 and 10, ran away from home to meet a man who lured them through the Roblox game and were rescued 700 miles away.

0

An image collage consisting of 2 images, image 1 shows a young girl in a pink and purple jacket and a woman in a police uniform looking at a cell phone, image 2 shows NINTCHDBPICT001052619531

Police have found two missing sisters.

allegedly lured away from home by a man they met on the online game Roblox.

Police rescued two girls, ages 16 and 10, from Nezahualcóyotl, Mexico, 700 miles away from their home.

Police allegedly lured two missing girls from their home in Mexico Credit: Comisaria General de Seguridad Ciudadana/Facebook
Girls rescued by police 700 miles away from home Credit: Comisaria General de Seguridad Ciudadana/Facebook

Police found the pair, who had been missing for 10 days, at a major bus terminal in Mexico City.

The investigation into child traffickers using online games to trap minors has begun, shrouding this matter in mystery.

The girls’ parents tried to call them when they first realised they were missing, but their phones were off.

Creepy security footage from their home shows the girls leaving with suitcases. https://ashdigitalskill.com/gold-and-silver-prices-soar-after-tariff-th/

border mystery

An elderly woman was found ‘unconscious’ and placed in a wheelchair 200 miles away from her home.

blaze horror

23 people killed, including children, in explosion in packed supermarket

Within hours, an alert was issued about missing persons, raising concerns about their safety.

Authorities learnt that the sisters had been talking to a man in Campeche using the chat feature of the online game Roblox.

Police reached the place where the girls were expected, but they were nowhere to be found.

The search went cold for several days as authorities mobilised their resources to locate the minors.

a success from Family Officers were dispatched to Mexico City’s Eastern Bus Terminal, where they found the girls ready to board a bus early Saturday morning.

They had reportedly arrived at the terminal after returning from Campeche.

Personnel from the Attorney General’s Office of the State of Mexico immediately returned them to their parents.

It has not yet been confirmed who convinced him to run away.

Police said in a statement that they believe his absence was voluntary.

But authorities are investigating whether a network of child traffickers is using online games to trap minors.

Roblox has more than 111 million users worldwide, and an estimated 40 percent of them are minors.

What is Roblox?

Roblox is a huge online gaming platform with over 111 million users worldwide

  • Users can design, share, and play millions of games.
  • There is a huge variety of game genres, from pet adoption to tycoon games.
  • Messaging features allow it to function as a social media space where users chat, play, and create online communities.
  • Many games also involve interaction with strangers.
  • You can choose to allow or prohibit chatting with other players in the game’s privacy settings.
  • Roblox is available on multiple devices, including PCs, Macs, smartphones, tablets, and gaming consoles like Xbox.

A police cybersecurity expert said, “They first make contact through the game’s chat and then invite them to talk on Discord.”

Perpetrators who infiltrate the platform may use friendly avatars, offer virtual gifts and build trust before convincing the children to flee.

Officials issued a series of recommendations to promote safe, healthy, and responsible video game use among children.

These include limiting usage, creating a schedule, choosing age-appropriate content, and monitoring their activities.

The girls were immediately reunited with their parents Credit: Comisaria General de Seguridad Ciudadana/Facebook
Police arrive at the eastern bus terminal in Mexico City Credit: Comisaria General de Seguridad Ciudadana/Facebook

Source link

Gold and silver prices soar after tariff threat

1

Gold and silver prices hit record highs but stock prices fell on Monday as investors reacted to Donald Trump’s threat as US President to impose new tariffs on eight European countries in protest over his proposed annexation of Greenland.

On Monday, gold prices hit $4,689.39 (£3,499) an ounce, while silver rose to a peak of $94.08 an ounce.

Precious metals are considered safe haven assets in times of uncertainty, and the prices of both gold and silver have risen over the past year.

But stock markets in Europe fell as investors were worried about the latest increase in geopolitical tensions.

On Saturday, Trump announced 10% tariffs on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands and Finland, which will take effect on Feb. 1 but could later rise to 25%—and will last until an agreement is reached on Greenland.

Reports suggest the EU is considering responding with a €93bn (£80bn) package of tariffs on US imports.

Concerns over the Greenland dispute led to another rise in gold

Concerns over the Greenland dispute led to another rise in gold and silver prices as investors turned to “safe haven” assets.

Last year, the price of gold rose by more than 60% due to concerns about global tensions and economic uncertainty.

However, there are other factors behind the rise, including expectations of more interest rate cuts, central banks adding hundreds of tonnes of gold to their reserves, and – with respect to silver – China announcing a ban on exports of the metal.

Susannah Streeter, chief investment strategist at the Wealth Club, stated that gold’s shine has propelled it to new record highs.

“The precious metal holds even more attraction as a safe haven as concerns spread about the consequences of aggressive US trade and geopolitical policies.”

However, despite the recent strong performance of gold and silver, stocks experienced a decline.

London’s FTSE 100 index closed down about 0.4%, while the FTSE 250 – which has more domestically concentrated companies – closed 0.9% lower. Financial companies and industrial stocks were mixed lower, but shares of gold miners Fresnillo and Endeavour rose after the latest rise in precious metals prices.

Shares of automotive, technology, and luxury goods companies across Europe fell sharply.

In Germany, the DAX index fell 1.3%, with car companies BMW, Mercedes-Benz and VW all falling about 2-3%.

In France, the CAC 40 index was down 1.8%, with luxury brands LVMH and Hermes among the losers.

However, European defence stocks rose, with Germany’s Rheinmetall and France’s Thales both trading higher.

America’s markets remain closed on Monday due to a public holiday.

“Fears that a tough trade deal between Europe and the US could now be scrapped have led to a significant decline in European indices,” said Danny Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell.

However, the US Supreme Court is set to rule on whether President Trump overstepped his authority by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose certain tariffs, a decision that could come as soon as Tuesday.

Hewson said “there could be another major reversal” if the court strikes down Trump’s tariffs.

The latest forecast from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) indicates that trade tensions pose a significant risk to global economic growth.

In its latest World Economic Outlook – prepared before the latest tariff threat emerged – it described the global economy as “stable” but said risks to growth included the end of the AI ​​boom and a “flare-up” in trade tensions.

Source link

UK snow maps reveal Britain ‘disappeared’ in 100-mile storm – only 10 counties survived weather | news

0

Britain is facing another major winter onslaught, as dramatic new weather maps reveal a powerful Atlantic storm is set to hit the UK with snow, heavy rain, and strong winds, leaving only a handful of counties spared. The latest ECMWF forecast chart, produced by WXCharts and valid for Tuesday, January 27, at 6 p.m., shows the storm rapidly descending from the Atlantic.

A map produced on January 19, showing instantaneous rainfall rates, clouds, temperature, and pressure, shows that large parts of the UK are covered at 6 p.m., with blue and purple stripes indicating widespread snowfall and green and yellow stripes indicating heavy rain. Parts of Scotland, Northern Ireland, northern England and the Midlands are shown under heavy snow, especially on higher ground. Wales and central and southern England, including London and the south-east, are being hit by prolonged downpours, with winter rainfall also adding to the chaos.

A second ECMWF map for 6pm on 27 January, prepared on 19 January, shows vast areas of the UK in orange and red, indicating that stronger winds are on the way. The Atlantic-facing coasts of Ireland, western Scotland and northwestern England are shown to be under the most extreme shade, with gusts in excess of 100 mph. Deep orange and red hues blanket much of England and Wales, indicating widespread gusts of 70 to 90 mph, even in inland areas.

Extreme wind gusts appear as the most dangerous feature on the map in the lower left corner, where the storm reaches extreme intensity over the Atlantic. These gusts can reach up to 110 mph; however, they are likely to lose power by the time they reach land.

They were mostly spared rain or snow.

Despite the widespread impact, the chart shows only 10 counties—concentrated in south-west England and western Wales—that were largely out of green, blue, or purple at the time, meaning they were mostly spared rain or snow.

England

  1. cornwall
  2. devon
  3. dorset
  4. topsy-turvy
  5. Wiltshire
  6. gloucestershire

wales

  1. pembrokeshire
  2. carmarthenshire
  3. Ceredigion
  4. Powys

The Met Office’s long-term forecast for the period 24 January to 2 February reads: “The UK will likely sit in the battleground between Atlantic weather systems attempting to move in from the west but will tend to stall in the vicinity of the UK as high pressure is encountered to the north and northeast.

“As such, there is a possibility of occasional rain or showers, which may be heavy and persistent, particularly in the south and west, with no dry intervals in the far north and northwest. While mild conditions will occasionally encroach on the south and west, it is likely to become somewhat colder during this period, bringing the risk of some snowfall, particularly over the hills of Scotland and northern England.

In relation to its long-range forecast, the Met Office warns, “When looking more than five days into the future, the chaotic nature of the atmosphere begins to play a larger role – small events currently occurring over the Atlantic can have a potentially significant impact on our weather in the UK and Ireland over the timescale of several days.”

Source link

Andrew Rosindale joins Reform UK after leaving the Conservative Party.

0

Andrew Rosindale has resigned from the Conservative Party and joined Reform UK.

The former shadow minister and MP for Romford said the Tories were “irreparably bound to the mistakes of previous governments” and unwilling to take “meaningful accountability” for poor decisions.

He said he had spoken to Nigel Farage on Sunday evening before agreeing to join his party. The Reform UK leader called him “a great patriot” who “will be a great addition to our team..”

A Conservative source said Rosindale’s departure was a prime example of Farage doing a “spring cleaning” of Badenoch and that Reform was “welcome” to him.

Rosindale’s move comes after Robert Jenrick joined Reform on Thursday, hours after he was sacked from the shadow cabinet by Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who accused him of plotting a defection.

The 59-year-old, who was a shadow minister for foreign affairs before his resignation, said in a statement on Twitter that “the views and concerns of constituents like me in Romford have been consistently ignored for too long.”

“Our country has endured a generation of managed decline,” he said. “Radical action is needed now to reverse the harmful decisions of the past and chart a new path for Britain.”

Rosindale becomes Reform’s seventh MP and the third sitting Conservative MP to join the party, following Danny Kruger and Jenrick.

This week’s defections mean that – setting aside independent MPs, who do not vote in a block – Reform UK now has the joint fifth-largest party group in the Commons with Sinn Féin, which does not send any of its seven MPs to Westminster.

She is two MPs behind the fourth largest party, the SNP.

Nearly 20 former Tory MPs have switched their allegiance to Reform UK, including former chancellor Nadhim Zahawi, who did so a week ago.

Speaking to BBC Breakfast, Jenrick said it was “very good news” Rosindale had joined Reform and added, “If other Members of Parliament were in a similar position, I’m sure Nigel [Farage] and the party would welcome him.

“But he has said very clearly that you need to make up your mind quickly because the recovery is accelerating.”

Shadow Welsh Secretary Mims Davis told BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour that Conservative MPs defecting over reform were “selfish and completely wrong.”.

He said, “I find it very confusing that these people who are saying they want to correct things want to be right-wing, but ultimately there is a lot in the reform that is very left-wing and frankly populist.

“I really don’t think it helps people to argue that Britain is failing. People want to know that, yes, things are wrong but the people they elected are willing to roll up their sleeves and put themselves into the work that needs to be fixed rather than looking selfish.”

Rosindale has held the Romford seat in east London since 2001, although his majority dropped from 17,893 to just 1,463 at the last general election.

After switching to Reform, he cited the Labour government’s decision to hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius and “the Conservative Party’s failure to actively hold the government to account on this issue both while in government and more recently in opposition” as one of the reasons for his defection.

“This sovereign British territory has been handed over to a foreign power by both the government and the opposition,” he stated.

Farage said, “The Tories’ lies and hypocrisy over the betrayal of the Chagos Islands have pushed her over the edge, and we are delighted to welcome her into our ranks.”

The move comes hours after the reform leader insisted that his party was “not a rescue charity for every frightened Tory MP.” And there will be no Conservative Party 2.0.

He wrote in the Daily Telegraph that Reform will not accept any more defectors after local elections on May 7.

A Conservative source said Rosindell “has been threatening to defect for months and as recently as Saturday was denying that it was happening”.

He added, “We are not going to be deterred from holding this disastrous Labour government to account.”

Labour Party chair Anna Turley said, “The stench of a failing and dying Tory party has now engulfed Reform.

“Nigel Farage is now unconditionally trying to improve his disastrous record,” he said. “The public won’t be fooled: the Tories failed Britain and the Reformers want to do it again.”

A Liberal Democrat source said the defection was “a turn for a career politician who was anxious to get a P45”, adding, “The public is fed up of hearing how Britain is broken by the same people who broke it.”

Generic held a press conference where he announced his defection to reform That the Tories “broke” the country and “betrayed its voters”, Britain is now “in decline”.

He later told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg that the country needed a “new and exciting” leader who “had not been part of that failed consensus.”

Badenoch called it a “good day” for the Conservatives and said Generics is “Nigel Farage’s problem now.”.

In the Telegraph, he expressed his belief that the reform would fail due to its acceptance of “toxic individuals” who have the ability to “destroy organisations”.

“A movement based on grievances and serial infidelity is bound to fail, and they will soon confront each other.”

Correction – Earlier in this story, the breaking news version incorrectly stated that Rosindale was the seventh Conservative MP to join Reform UK. He is actually the third sitting Conservative to switch allegiance, taking the number of UK Reform MPs to seven.

Source link

UN chief Antonio Guterres told the BBC that the US believes its power outweighs international law.

1

UN Photo / Alba Garcia Ruiz Antonio Guterres speaks to BBC correspondent Anna FosterUN Photo / Alba Garcia Ruiz
Antonio Guterres informed the BBC that some individuals hold the belief that the law of power should supplant the authority of law.

The UN chief told the BBC the US is acting with impunity and believes its power outweighs international law.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today show,

António Guterres said Washington had a “clear conviction” that multilateral solutions were irrelevant.

What matters, he added, is “the exercise of power and influence by the United States, and sometimes by the norms of international law in this regard.”.

His comments came just weeks after the US invaded Venezuela and seized its president, and they were made in the context of Donald Trump’s repeated threats to annex Greenland.

Guterres said he believes the founding principles of the United Nations – including the equality of member states – are now threatened.

President Trump has been sharply critical of the United Nations in the past as well.

He used his address to the General Assembly last September to question its purpose, claiming that they “ended seven unavoidable wars on their own” and that the UN “did not try to help any of them.”

“Later, I realised that the United Nations is not for us,” he said.

Presented with this devastating assessment, Guterres acknowledged that his organisation was struggling to get members to follow the international laws set out in the UN Charter.

He stressed that the United Nations is “deeply engaged” in resolving major global conflicts. “But the UN lacks influence, as the major powers exert a significantly stronger influence.”

He questioned whether that additional leverage was being used to find real and lasting solutions to those conflicts or merely as a quick fix. “There is a huge difference between the two things,” he said.

Guterres also said his organisation needed reforms to deal with the “dramatic problems and challenges” facing its 193 members.

The UN chief stated, “There are those who believe that the law of might should replace the power of law.”

“Indeed, the US’s current policy shows that multilateral solutions are irrelevant, and that the US’s power and influence, and sometimes the application of international law, are what matters.”

He suggested that the UN Security Council – which was created to maintain international peace and security – no longer represents the world and is “ineffective”.

Any of the council’s permanent members – France, China, Russia, Britain or the US – can currently veto resolutions. Both Russia and the US have used this power to thwart global efforts to end the wars in Ukraine and Gaza.

Guterres claimed that the veto was being used to advance the interests of individual members and criticised the fact that “three European countries” were permanent members.

He called for changes to the structure of the Council—to “gain legitimacy” and “give voice to the whole world”—and to limit veto powers to avoid unacceptable “obstructions.”

Reuters Antonio Guterres reaches out to shake hands with Sir Keir Starmer at Downing Street in a photo taken on January 16reuters
Guterres, whose term as secretary-general is ending, met Sir Keir Starmer in London last Friday

Guterres – a former Portuguese prime minister – took over as UN chief in 2017 and will leave the role at the end of this year.

In his annual comments to the General Assembly, which are traditionally used to identify the organisation’s priorities, he warned of a world in anarchy, “full of conflict, impunity, inequality and unpredictability”, and identified “blatant violations of international law” as one of the greatest challenges facing the global order.

Guterres highlighted Gaza as a crucial current conflict for the United Nations.

It was prevented from distributing aid to the Gaza Strip for large parts of the war, as Israel blocked international humanitarian organisations from bringing it to the area.

At one point, Israel even supported an outside contractor – the Gaza Humanitarian Organization – to do the work the UN had traditionally done for decades. Hundreds of Palestinians were killed trying to get food at GHF sites.

When asked if he saw the United Nations as powerless in Gaza, where it should have made a difference, he said, “Of course, but to be clear.

For a long time, Israel blamed the UN’s inability to deliver aid for the lack of humanitarian assistance. Whenever Israel forbade entry into Gaza, we were unable to enter. And then there was a ceasefire, and there was a giant flow of humanitarian aid.”

He insisted, “We were ready, provided we had the conditions.”

A few days earlier, Guterres told the UN General Assembly that “problem-solving in 1945” will not solve 2026 problems, referring to the organisation’s founding structure.

The challenges keep coming, with the US-forced leadership change in Venezuela, the killing of thousands of protesters by regime forces in Iran, and Donald Trump’s stated aim to annex Greenland.

Questions continue to grow about the death of multilateralism and the failure of some world leaders to defend the rule of international law.

But António Guterres told me he remains positive.

“I think people are sometimes reluctant to confront the powerful. But the truth is that if we don’t confront the powerful, we will never be able to create a better world.”

Source link

The enigmatic vocalist has received millions of streams, but who or what is she?

0

Sienna Rose Sienna Rose, a woman with dark curly hair, appears in the sepia-toned image with her eyes closed, wearing large hoop earrings and singing into an old-fashioned microphone.

Sienna Rose has nearly three million monthly listeners on Spotify.

Sienna Rose is having a fantastic month.

The song has been played more than five million times.

Three of his dark, jazz-infused soul songs are in Spotify’s Viral Top 50. The most popular, a dreamy song called Into the Blue, has been played more than five million times.

If she continues on this path, Rose could become one of the hottest new stars of the year.

There’s just one problem: all signs point to him not being real.

Streaming service Deezer, which has developed tools to deal with AI music, told the BBC that “many of its albums and songs on the platform have been identified and marked as computer-generated.”.

Look closely and you’ll see signs of an AI artist. Rose has no social media presence, he’s never played a show, he doesn’t have any videos and he’s released an incredible number of songs in a very short period of time.

Between September 28 and December 5, she uploaded at least 45 tracks to streaming services. Even Prince, the artist known for his restless creative frenzy, would have struggled to match that figure.

His Instagram account, which is currently inactive, featured a strangely symmetrical series of headshots, all showing the blurry, unrealistic lighting that is characteristic of an AI image generator.

A screenshot of Sienna Rose's artist page on Tidal Tidaltide
On the streaming service Tidal, Rose is also credited with albums of folk and ambient music that were uploaded last year, which featured various singers in the artwork.

Then there is the music. Songs like Into the Blue and Breathe Again are graceful next to Norah Jones or Alicia Keys, filled with jazzy guitar lines and buttery smooth vocals.

But several listeners have noticed what they identified as “AI artefacts”.

Play Under the Rain or Breathe Again and you’ll hear an audible whisper throughout the track.

This is a common trait of music produced on apps like Listen and Udio —partially because of the way they start with white noise and gradually refine it until it sounds like music.

It is this quirk that enables Deezer to mark AI songs.

“When [software] has all the layers and devices it connects, it introduces errors,” explains Gabriel Meseguer-Brocal, senior research scientist at the streaming company.

“They’re not perceptible; we can’t hear them, but they’re easy to identify if you do some mathematical operations.”

Meseguer-Brocal says the errors work like fingerprints, with a “unique signature” that means it’s possible to trace which piece of software was used to create any given piece of music.

Sienna Rose Sienna Rose Another image shows her dark hair and large hoops and face in profile, with eyes closed and a microphone in front of her sienna rose
The mystery surrounding the singer raises big questions around AI-generated music

For casual listeners, there are other telltale signs: inconsistent drum patterns, monotonous lyrics, and a singer who never strays from the melody or lets loose with the final chorus.

That “normal” sound has been Sienna Rose’s biggest clue to some listeners.

“I was like, ‘I like this,’ but there was something there that was very ‘uncanny valley’,” TikTok music critic Elosi57 said.

“So I went to see [at her profile] And I said, ‘It’s AI.'”

another user Posted on x: “Started listening to Olivia Dean (fantastic). Within two days Spotify recommended Sienna Rose, who has a similar sound but is more generic. It took me a few songs to realise she was an AI.”

Broadcaster Gemma Cairney told BBC Radio 4, “Her pictures seem a bit surreal… and after listening to the music, is there a part of her soul missing?”

To be fair, many other people have become fans of Rose’s songs.

They also include pop star Selena Gomez, who used Rose’s track “Where Your Warmth Begins” as the background of an Instagram post about Sunday’s Golden Globes.

The song was later removed when questions about Rose’s identity spread online, but Gomez’s post brought interest in Rose and her identity to a new level.

And many listeners playing Rose’s music were disappointed when they learnt he no longer existed.

“Please tell me he’s real.” Pinned one on threads.

“I’m disappointed because some of their songs came out and the music is not bad.” Another nod on BlueSky. “[But] someone said, ‘Once you know it, it seems soulless,’ and I agree.”

AI music ban

Of course, it’s entirely possible that everyone misunderstood the situation, and Sienna Rose is a genuine singer who remains hidden from the spotlight. Maybe he’s in witness protection. Perhaps she is a real singer, embroiled in a contract dispute with her label and releasing music under a pseudonym.

If so, I’m sorry. It would be crushing to have your music labelled soulless “slop”. But it’s indicative of the problem the entire music industry is facing right now.

AI software is becoming so sophisticated that cloned artists are competing with real musicians.

One song was chart-topping in Sweden this week banned from charts When journalists discovered that the artist behind it, Jacob, did not exist.

There are many people – both in tech companies and on the business side of the music industry – who want to see AI succeed.

The costs of launching an act like Sienna Rose are practically zero, but her music is earning an estimated £2,000 per week in royalties.

Compare this to the K-pop industry, where labels invest an average of $1 million (£750,000) per year per member of a girl or boy group, and you can see the attraction.

Interestingly, many of Rose’s tracks are credited to US indie record label Brock – who have a track record of turning viral artists like bbno$ and Ndotz into chart stars.

If you visit their website, Rose is not listed as one of their signees – but British dance act Heaven is.

If that name rings a bell, it’s because they got into trouble late last year for creating a song using an AI clone of Jorja Smith’s voice.

Their song was ‘Run’. Removed from streaming services After the track was issued a takedown notice by record industry bodies, alleging that the track infringed copyright, it was re-recorded with human vocals and entered the UK top 10 two weeks later.

The BBC has contacted Brock to ask about his relationship with Sienna Rose but has not yet heard back.

The BBC has also contacted another label, Nostalgic Records, which lists Rose on its website.

The Nostalgic Records biography claims she is “London-based” and says she is “not just an artist, but a storyteller at heart”.

Reuters Ray sings on stage wearing a red dress with a microphone in hand and a lead slung over her shoulder reuters
Pop star Ray says fans prefer real, heartfelt music rather than computer-generated emptiness

Deezer says that 34% of songs uploaded to its streaming service – about 50,000 per day – are AI-generated.

“Eighteen months ago, it was about 5% or 6%,” says Meseguer-Brocal. “It’s kind of shocking how fast it’s growing.”

Still, Deezer hasn’t gone as far as online music store Bandcamp, which announced this week that it was banning all AI-generated music.

In a statement, Spotify defended the presence of artists like Rose on its playlists.

A spokesperson said, “It is not always possible to draw a simple line between ‘AI’ and ‘non-AI’ music.” “Spotify does not produce or own any music and does not promote or penalise tracks created using AI tools.”

Meanwhile, the backlash against AI music is growing.

Last year, artists including Paul McCartney, Kate Bush, Damon Albarn, the Pet Shop Boys and Annie Lennox released a “silent album” protesting against companies that train their AI models on copyrighted works without permission.

Speaking at the Ivor Novello Awards in 2024, pop star Ray told me he believes fans will always choose real music over algorithm-generated filler.

“There is no reason to feel threatened,” he said. “I don’t write because I’m trying to be the best writer. I write because I’m trying to tell my story.

“I’m trying to lift some of the weight I’ve been carrying or I’m trying to express myself and feel better.”

At the same event, Koje Radikal said that he was not worried about AI, while he also did not trust his washing machine to start on time.

“Why is everyone trying to scare me with robots?” He laughed.

I’m not afraid of robots. I will win.”





Source link

When will the NASA Moon mission launch and who are the Artemis II crew?

0
When will the NASA Moon mission launch and who are the Artemis II crew?
The NASA image shows four astronauts in bright orange space suits posing for a formal group portrait against a dark background. The suits are heavy with blue seams, straps and pockets, emphasizing their technical design. Behind the seated astronaut are three astronauts standing, all facing the camera. They all have a fairly neutral expression, keeping the focus on the uniform. Mission-style patches and flags are visible on their arms and chest, including the US and Canadian flags. Soft, focused lighting makes the bright orange suit stand out dramatically.NASA
The Artemis II crew consists of Christina Koch (rear), Victor Glover (pilot, front), Reed Wiseman (commander, right), and Jeremy Hansen.

The first manned Moon mission in more than 50 years could be launched by NASA in the first week of February.

On Saturday, in preparation, NASA plans to move its giant Space Launch System (SLS) moon rocket and Orion space capsule from the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) to the launch pad.

The Artemis II mission, which will last about 10 days, could take its astronauts further into space than ever before.

Its goal is to set the stage for the eventual human landing on the lunar surface, the first since the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 70s.

When will Artemis II launch?

Saturday’s planned four-mile trip on Crawler-Transporter-2 will take 12 hours. Once there, engineers will begin a series of launchpad preparations, including connecting ground support equipment such as power lines, fuel environment control system ducts, and cryogenic propellant feed.

In late January, NASA will conduct a wet dress rehearsal, a prelaunch test for fuelling the rocket. If there are any problems, NASA can return SLS and Orion to the Vehicle Assembly Building for additional work before launch.

But if all systems go well, the earliest possible launch date would be Friday, February 6. The moon must be in the right location as the rocket is ready, so sequential launch windows are selected accordingly.

In practice, this means a week at the beginning of each month during which the rocket is pointed in the right direction, followed by three weeks where there are no launch opportunities.

So the possible launch dates are:

  • 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 February
  • 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11 March, and
  • 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 April

Who are the Artemis II crew members, and what will they do?

Artemis II’s crew of four includes NASA Commander Reed Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover and Mission Specialist Christina Koch. A second mission specialist, Jeremy Hansen of the Canadian Space Agency, will also be on board.

The mission includes the first crewed flight of the SLS and Orion.

Once they are safely in orbit, the astronauts will test how the Orion spacecraft handles. This will involve manually flying a capsule in Earth orbit to practice steering and line up a spacecraft for a future moon landing.

They will then fly to a point thousands of kilometres away from the moon to test Orion’s life support, propulsion, power and navigation systems.

The crew will also act as medical test subjects, sending back data and imagery from deep space.

They will operate in a small cabin in weightlessness. Radiation levels will be higher than at the International Space Station, which is in low Earth orbit, but still safe.

Upon returning to Earth, the astronauts will experience a bumpy return through the atmosphere and splashdown over the US west coast in the Pacific Ocean.

Will Artemis II land on the Moon?

No, this mission is to prepare the ground for a lunar landing by astronauts in the Artemis III mission.

NASA says the Artemis III launch will not occur before 2027. However, experts believe that 2028 is the earliest possible date.

The final choice of spacecraft to carry crews to the lunar surface has not yet been made. This will either be SpaceX’s Starship lander or a craft designed by Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin.

The new spacesuits made by American company Axiom are also not ready.

When Artemis III finally takes off, the astronauts will head toward the moon’s south pole.

The aim is then to maintain a continuous human presence on the Moon.

Artemis IV and V will begin construction of Gateway, a small space station orbiting the Moon. This will be followed by more landings on the Moon, additional segments added to the Gateway and new robotic rovers operating on the surface. More countries will be involved in preventing people from living and working on and around the Moon for long periods of time.

Graphic showing Earth and the Moon along with a diagram of Artemis II's 8 orbital trajectory. Specific points are labelled. These are: 1. Takeoff from Kennedy Space Center, 2. Orbit around Earth, 3. Rocket separation, 4. Main engine start-up to take spacecraft to the Moon, 5. Lunar flyby, 6. Return to Earth, 7. Crew module separation, 8. Splashdown in the Pacific Ocean.

When was the last moon mission?

The last crewed Moon mission was Apollo 17, which landed in December 1972 and returned to Earth at the end of the same month.

In total, 24 astronauts visited the Moon during the Apollo program, and 12 of them walked on its surface. Of the 24 who went to the Moon, only five are still alive.

The US first moved to defeat the Soviet Union in the 1960s primarily to assert its geopolitical and technological dominance. After achieving that goal, political enthusiasm, public interest, and funding for future moonshots waned.

The Artemis program evolved from a desire to return humans to the moon, but this time it was built around new technology and commercial partnerships for a long-term presence.

An illustration showing how Artemis II astronauts will be arranged in the Orion crew module at launch. Four astronauts are sitting in two rows of two, with their backs towards the ground. During the mission the four crew members will spend 10 days in approximately nine cubic meters of living space. The image shows that the crew module makes up about half of the Orion spacecraft – the service module is around the same size – and on the launchpad, Orion is only a small section of the 98-meter (320 ft) Space Launch System rocket.

Are other countries planning to send astronauts to the Moon?

Several other countries have ambitions to send people to the Moon in the 2030s

European astronauts are set to join subsequent Artemis missions and Japan has also reserved seats.

China is building its own spacecraft, aiming for the first landing near the moon’s south pole by 2030.

Russia continues to talk about flying astronauts to the surface and building a small base between about 2030 and 2035. However, sanctions, funding pressures and technical setbacks mean the timetable is overly optimistic.

India has also expressed its ambition to see its astronauts walk on the Moon one day.

Following the success of Chandrayaan 3’s landing near the Moon’s south pole in August 2023, India’s space agency aims to send astronauts to the Moon by around 2040. This will be part of its efforts to take the human spaceflight program beyond low Earth orbit.

Kevin Church provided additional reporting on this topic.

Source link