Spain beat Argentina 1-0 in the most one-sided World Cup final in history. From Ferran Torres’ heroics to Lionel Messi’s last dance, here are the player ratings as claimed by Luis de la Fuente as his second star…
Spain
Yonai Simon – 5
Argentina had literally no shots until the 117th minute. Maybe you got a nice tan and definitely got your hands on the trophy.
Pedro Porro – 8
Lamine Yamal was a constant threat to score runs. It was his cross that finally sparked the opener – a crucial delivery to Williams at the back post.
Pau Cuberci – 6
Played with maturity beyond his years. There wasn’t much to stop the Argentine, but they were consistently calm whenever a threat appeared. World Cup Winner and Young Player of the Tournament.
Aymeric Laporte – 6
There was nothing to do defensively. A half chance came late on in normal time, but he couldn’t get enough purchase with his header.
Mark Cucorella – 7
Just like at the Euros two years ago, Cucurella has raised his stock this summer and followed it up with another fine performance at both ends of the pitch.
Rhodri – 7
The midfield general. The game kept ticking in Spain’s favour. He was brought on in extra time, which is understandable given his injury history and the fact that playing more than 90 minutes would have been a risk.
Fabian Ruiz – 6
89 per cent pass completion and two chances created. A solid if unremarkable performance from the PSG man before being subbed off after just an hour.
Lamin emal – 5
Was it the day he took the crown from King Macy? Absolutely not. The teenage superstar was targeted and kept quiet, but he will accept the results when they come.
Image: Lamine Yamal and Lionel Messi embrace after the World Cup final.
Dani Olmo – 5
For all Spain’s possessions, it didn’t quite happen for Olmo. Honestly, there wasn’t much happening in front of him, so it was hard to make an impact.
Alex Bina – 5
Whether it was Montel or Molina, the Argentine right winger was available. Bina works well with Cucorella, but bringing in Williams to add more momentum is a sensible move.
Mikel Owersball – 6
He was the only one in trouble for Martinez in the first half, but as is so often the case, he was sacrificed so Spain could step up with an alternative approach.
Subs
Ferran Torres – 8
A moment he will never forget. It was a truly stunning piece of harmony and quality when it mattered most. His teammates struggled to show it, but Ferran Torres had it in abundance. To forever be the man who won the 2026 World Cup.
Please consider using the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.
Ferran Torres scored a crucial extra-time goal to give Spain a 1-0 lead in the World Cup final against Argentina.
Padre – 6
He looked smart on the ball and brought a little more energy than Fabian Ruiz in midfield.
Mikel Merino – 5
His moment looked like it came in extra time when he got on the end of a cross just outside the six-yard box. Nate should have risen, but Super Sab missed his mark and his chance to be a hero.
Nico Williams – 7
The substitute was brought on to make an impact and thought he had done so when he provided the ball for the extra-time opener, only for it to be controversially ruled out. However, he grabbed the assist for his moment’s winner, forcing a nod towards Torres.
Please consider using the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.
Spanish and Argentinian fans react to Nico Williams’ goal, which was disallowed early on for a foul on Nicolas Otamendi.
Martin Zobemendi – 5
Half of his playing time was spent doing things he wasn’t brought in to do as Argentina pressed for a late equaliser. He wasn’t at Rodri’s level, but he provided fresh legs at an important time.
Eric Garcia – 6
Argentina were throwing the kitchen sink at Spain, and Garcia added an extra defensive body to see out the game.
Argentina
Amy Martinez – 8
He started convincingly, but as the game progressed, Martinez became more subdued. There were many straightforward saves that he rattled off. He recovered his composure though, making key saves to keep Argentina in it late on and into extra time. Unfortunately, it wasn’t enough for him.
Image: Argentina’s players look frustrated after Ferran Torres’ success for Spain.
Gonzalo Montel – 5
He struggled to get forward and often couldn’t keep up with Cucurella’s overlapping movement down the other end. He did nothing during his World Cup-winning moment four years ago.
Cristian Romero – 6
Had to defend a lot, and with Martinez coming on just before half-time, he and Otamendi worked well together for the most part before limping off on 70 minutes.
Lisandro Martinez – 4
Perhaps a bit harsh, as he did nothing wrong but received a booking and was injured before half-time.
Nicholas Tagliafico – 6
Marshalled Lamine Yamal about it as well as he could. The youngster certainly didn’t do anything remarkable, which is a testament to the Argentine left-back.
Rodrigo De Paul – 5
He struggled to get a grip on the midfield battle against Rodri and Ruiz.
Alexis McAllister – 5
The rest sat back, as the Argentine was unable to show what he had in his possession. His approach to the game rather than his individual efforts hindered him.
Enzo Fernandez – 2
His absolutely idiotic stoppage-time tackle on Cubbery, who had already been booked for talking to the referee, left his team in a terrible position in extra time. They were already under the cosh; it just worsened it.
He has no hands on his ears after that.
Image: Enzo Fernandez’s reaction to World Cup final exit
Nico Gonzalez – 6
Indeed, he looked a threat when he chanced to carry the ball forward but was withdrawn at half-time as Argentina looked far more defensively settled.
Lionel Messi – 4
If this is the end of Lionel Messi, it was not what he would have dreamt of. It didn’t impact the game nearly as much as expected, but what a tournament it was. What a player.
The picture of him sitting on the floor, defeated, may be the last picture of him on a football pitch for all we know. If so, he walks away with his head held high, even if he can’t find another moment in magical history.
Image: Lionel Messi was unable to find his magic spark last time out.
Julian Alvarez – 3
Argentina played a defensive game, and Alvarez could not get involved. He was replaced by a centre-half in extra time, which tells you all you need to know about how Lionel Scaloni was approaching the game.
Subs
Nicolas Otamendi – 6
A veteran name was brought in for possibly one last dance. Led the defence fairly well until the inevitable happened.
Leandro Paredes – 2
Shocking. He came on, fouled, did nothing positive and then carried himself so badly that he got a red card after the final whistle. He should be ashamed of himself.
Nahuel Molina – 3
Beaten at the back post by Williams to set up Torres’ winner. He then punched Rodri, sparking ugly scenes at full-time as he took to the pitch to celebrate with his team-mates. A sore loser might be trying to get out of his role in an expensive cause.
Facundo Medina – 5
Medina couldn’t do much to stop the Spanish attack, but he was one of the defenders on the pitch when he eventually scored.
Giuliano Simeone – 5
He kicked his socks off after coming on but will always rue his lack of extra time in stoppage time. He would see his name in lights when the ball landed at his feet in a corner. Instead, he fired his half-volley over the bar.
Marcos Senisi – 5
Senisi put in some decent tackles, but his introduction in place of Alvarez was a classic Thomas Tuchel move. He condemned Argentina for trying to hold him back – before conceding – and perhaps wished he had stopped another attacker.
Player of the Match: Ferran Torres
Image: Ferran Torres celebrates scoring his opener in extra time
Rate the players!
Have your say on who stole the show using our interactive tool…
US Central Command (CENTCOM) said a service member was killed following an Iranian drone attack in Jordan, adding to the two deaths disclosed earlier in iraq, where the discovery of unidentified remains raised the possibility of a fourth fatality in the past three days.
“A US service member in northern Iraq was killed in action July 18 during a controlled detonation of unexploded ordnance from a downed Iranian one-way attack drone. A second service member was wounded and continues to receive medical treatment for a minor injury,” CENTCOM said on July 19.
A day earlier, CENTCOM had disclosed the first combat losses in the Iran war since March, saying two service members had been killed and another was missing during defensive operations in Jordan as hostilities ramped up in the region and further endangered a fragile cease-fire.
In its latest statement, the military said that “after a thorough search, US military personnel found unidentified remains at the location earlier today [in Jordan]. An examination process to verify the remains is ongoing, raising the possibility that they belong to the missing service member.
That statement did not specify where in Jordan the attack occurred. Identification of the victims was not provided pending notification of family members.
The main site of US operations on the territory of the Middle East ally is the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base, about 80 kilometres outside Amman. US forces also have operations at the Prince Hassan Air Base and at other military facilities in Jordan.
The Wall Street Journal and others, citing sources, reported that the strike occurred at the Muwaffaq Salti base, which US forces have used to launch air strikes against Iran.
US President Donald Trump told the NewsNation network that the deaths were “sorrowful. It’s a sorrowful thing.”
“We hate to see it happen. It’s in service to our country,” he said in a brief interview. On July 19, Trump was attending the World Cup final in the US state of New Jersey.
Jordan Condemns Iran
Jordan, on July 19, summoned Iran’s representative in Amman to protest Tehran’s missile and drone strikes on the Middle Eastern nation, labelling them “brutal and unjustified.”
The CENTCOM statement did not provide further details on the fatality in Iraq.
US forces remain operating in Iraq for training and anti-terror purposes, although numbers are down significantly from the 170,000 at the height of the Iraq war. US and Iraqi officials have said that US troops will fully depart in September.
The newly reported deaths bring the total of known fatalities among US military personnel since the start of the US-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28 to 17, with all but one listed as combat deaths. The total does not include the missing service member in Jordan.
On March 1, a drone hit a command centre in Kuwait, killing six service members.
On March 8, a US soldier was killed during an attack on the Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia.
On March 12, a plane crashed in western Iraq, killing six members of a refuelling aircraft.
A Navy pilot also died in what officials described as a noncombat incident when a helicopter crashed in the Arabian Sea in early July.
In Iran, meanwhile, recent attacks on the country had killed 50 people and injured more than 500. The report could not be independently verified.
US forces as of July 19 had launched eight straight nights of air strikes against Iran, mostly focusing on the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran has attempted to control the strait by firing on vessels that it says have not received proper permission.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) said four ships attempted to transit the strait without its approval and that two “had an accident and were stopped in place. ” The claim could not be verified.
Iran continued to launch attacks on July 19, striking out at US Gulf Arab allies in retaliation for US air strikes, which the Pentagon said were in response to Tehran’s violation of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed by both sides.
Joint Israeli-Jordanian Effort Reported
The Israeli military told AFP that Israeli and Jordanian forces had intercepted an Iranian missile aimed at the Jordanian city of Aqaba.
The Jordanian military said it had downed “three Iranian missiles that targeted the kingdom’s territory”, without specifying the location.
The Gulf state of Kuwait, meanwhile, said Iran struck a power and water plant, igniting flames.
It was the third attack in as many days on such a facility in Kuwait, while authorities said an oil site had been hit the day before.
Sam Ato Timaloa, a paroled sex offender who also served time for attempted murder, had dementia and an acute intolerance of noise – especially from roommates at Sunrise Post Acute, a nursing home in Banning, California. Over four months in 2025, a state investigative report found, Sunrise switched Timaloa’s room eight times, the last into one occupied by Attilio Cecchetto, 92, a retired tile installer whose dementia led him to frequently moan, mumble, and yell.
Overnight, a nurse aide walked into their room and saw blood splattered on the floor, walls, and ceiling, according to a grand jury transcript. Cecchetto’s face, the aide testified, “looked twisted and smashed.” A Banning city police officer testified that Timaloa, 77, told him that he had punched Cecchetto twice.
“He just kept saying that Attilio was being too loud: ‘He talks too much,'” the officer said.
Cecchetto died two days later from blunt force facial trauma.
“You get placed in a facility like this to be taken care of, not to be murdered,” one of his sons, Gino Cecchetto, said in an interview. “The incident was completely preventable at many different points.”
Timaloa pleaded not guilty to assault. The charges were later upgraded to murder, and a judge ordered a mental health evaluation. The judge will rule as early as August on whether Timaloa is competent to stand trial.
PACS Group, the nursing home chain that owns Sunrise, denied negligence. “We strive to provide quality care to everyone we serve, and our hearts continue to go out to the Cecchetto family for their loss.” PACS spokesman Brooks Stevenson said in an email.
In nursing homes primarily occupied by impoverished people as well as posh assisted living facilities that cost upward of $10,000 a month, agitated residents have shoved, punched, bit, and kicked others. They have wielded canes, walkers, pens, a plate, a mop stick, a shoe, a belt buckle, and even the footrests of wheelchairs as weapons, federal inspection reports show.
How often these altercations take place nationwide is unknown, but an in-depth study of 14 assisted living facilities in New York State led by Cornell University researchers estimated 1 in 7 residents experienced aggression within a month, including verbal, physical, or sexual acts. Their separate study of 10 nursing homes in New York state estimated 1 in 5 residents experienced an altercation in a month. Researchers have found that these assailants are disproportionately likely to have dementia.
The diseases that cause dementia can impair brain circuits involved in impulse control and threat perception, which raises the risk of aggressive behaviour. Residents with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias make up more than 900,000 of the 2.2 million people living in these settings, many of which include specialised memory care units.
Often, altercations involving a resident with dementia erupt after danger signals are missed or ineffectively addressed, according to a KFF Health News examination of court records, police reports, and state and federal inspection reports.
Since the start of 2024, the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services have faulted nursing homes at least 700 times for failing to protect residents from physical, sexual, or verbal abuse by other residents, CMS inspection reports show. The federal records do not include assisted living facilities, which are regulated by the states.
In the first three months of this year, CMS cited nursing homes more often for resident-to-resident abuse than for any other type of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, including abuse by employees, the reports show.
The long-term care industry says some clashes are unavoidable. Presbyterian Homes & Services, a non-profit Christian chain of senior living facilities, said in a statement: “Caring for individuals living with advanced dementia is complex, and behaviours can change in ways that are difficult to fully predict or prevent, even with clinical interventions in place.”
Eilon Caspi, a dementia consultant and researcher who studies resident-on-resident altercations, said that there is usually a specific unmet need that precedes an altercation. “In the vast majority of incidents,” he said, “there are warning signs in the months, weeks, days, hours, and sometimes minutes and seconds prior.”
Breeding grounds
One psychological theory about Alzheimer’s, the most common dementia disease, holds that as the brain’s networks deteriorate, the balance shifts between the prefrontal cortex, which helps govern judgement and self-control, and limbic regions, including the amygdala, which helps process fear and threat responses.
As cognition clouds, people lose the ability to understand what is happening around them and to put distress into words, researchers say. Pain, infection, medication side effects, and other physical and emotional distresses can lead to shouting, intimidating gestures, kicking, pushing, or punching. Long-term care facilities can be triggering environments, with intimate care often delivered by a changing stream of aides that residents can’t recognise. Amid noise, close quarters, and rigid routines, interactions become flash points.
“You don’t feel safe because you don’t know these strangers who are coming in and taking off your clothes,” said Al Power, a geriatrician and an advocate for alternative models of care for people with cognitive issues. “These things will be distressing to anybody.”
The Cornell researchers found verbal altercations were the most common type of aggressive interaction but estimated 4% of assisted living residents and 5% of nursing home residents in their studies experienced physical assaults in a month.
Another Cornell study found that Connecticut police were called to nursing homes for resident-to-resident clashes more often than allegations of staff abuse, theft, and residents wandering away without supervision combined. A national analysis of survey data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calculated nearly 8% of residents in assisted living facilities engaged in physical aggression or abuse toward other residents or staff members.
Many of the physical aggressions KFF Health News identified in CMS inspection reports were perpetrated by residents with diagnoses of dementia, schizophrenia, or other cognitive disorders. In some physical altercations, both residents were aggressors, while other fights were one-sided. Occasionally the residents were roommates.
Laura Mosqueda, a geriatrician at the University of Southern California’s Keck Medicine in Los Angeles and a senior adviser to the National Center on Elder Abuse, said: “What worries me is that we just end up blaming two people who have either cognitive impairment or severe, uncontrolled mental health issues, when they’re supposed to be in an environment where people are safe.”
“Only a matter of time.”
Rebecca Norton warned officials at her mother’s memory care facility that another resident was harassing her mother, Gladys Lynch. A Minnesota report said the resident later shoved Lynch down, and she died five days later.
Gladys Lynch, a retired department store accountant, transferred into the memory care unit at Harbour Crossing in White Bear Lake, Minnesota, in September 2025. Her monthly cost was more than $10,000, according to an invoice provided by the family.
One of Lynch’s daughters, Rebecca Norton, installed web cameras in her room and often saw another resident inside. “Every day I looked at it, this woman would be walking into my mom’s room, harassing her, digging through her things, using her bathroom, yelling at her,” Norton said in an interview. She informed Harbour Crossing’s administration, and the facility said it would start locking her mother’s door.
Norton emailed a Harbour Crossing administrator a list of issues with her mother’s care. “My biggest concern,” she wrote, was that her mother’s door was not consistently locked and the webcam showed the woman had again entered, rummaged through the bathroom, and taken a couple of adult nappies.
Unknown to Norton, Harbour aides had raised concerns about the other resident, who like Lynch was new to Harbour Crossing’s memory unit, according to a Minnesota Department of Health report. The woman, diagnosed with Alzheimer’s and severe dementia, experienced confusion, had difficulty communicating her needs, and hit aides due to agitation, depression, and anxiety.
Aides repeatedly reported that the woman had “ongoing aggression, entered other residents’ apartments, invaded others’ personal space, and was difficult to redirect,” the health report said. They said medications had been ineffective and pressed for new ones. The report said one nurse told the woman’s doctor that it was “only a matter of time before” she “hurts another resident.”
Captured on camera
On the last day of September, she entered Lynch’s room and resisted leaving, the state report said. The next morning, she reappeared. The police and state reports described the video of the incident, and KFF Health News reviewed it. It shows Lynch guided the woman out and appeared to attempt to lock the door, but the woman opened it and returned once more.
The woman declared it was her house, went into Lynch’s bathroom, used the toilet, and then returned to the room Lynch was in. Lynch can be seen repeatedly pressing the alert pendant around her neck to signal nurses for help.
The video shows the woman was almost out of her apartment door when she tried to touch an object near the door. Lynch put her hands up to block her. The woman slapped at her hands and said, “I’m going to kill you if you don’t quit it.” She pushed Lynch, who fell, her head hitting the floor and blood seeping out.
Aides arrived 13 minutes after she had initially pressed her pendant, the state report said. Lynch suffered a brain haemorrhage and fractures to her eye socket and ribs, according to the state report. She died in the hospital five days later at age 96; the medical examiner’s office declared it a homicide.
Gladys Lynch was a department store accountant and raised three daughters before developing dementia. Here is a collection of Lynch’s personal letters and photographs at her daughter Rebecca’s home in Hugo, Minnesota.
Norton said her mother was kind and pleasant and never combative. “My mom deserved better than what they gave her,” she said.
Prosecutors declined to bring charges, according to the police report. The state investigation concluded that Harbour Crossing was responsible for neglect because it was aware that the woman “exhibited violent and aggressive behaviours” and yet had failed to put in place effective interventions. Harbour Crossing has requested the state reconsider its findings.
Before Gladys Lynch’s death, employees at the memory care unit at Harbour Crossing in White Bear Lake, Minnesota, struggled to keep the resident who fatally assaulted her from behaving aggressively and wandering into other residents’ rooms, a state report found. Harbour Crossing has asked the state to reconsider its findings of negligence
In June, Suzanne Scheller, the attorney for Lynch’s family, filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Presbyterian Homes, which owns Harbour Crossing.
The Presbyterians said in a statement: “We are deeply saddened by the loss of Ms Lynch, and our thoughts remain with her family and all those impacted.” It declined to comment further on the incident or the lawsuit.
Preventive tactics
Geriatricians, researchers, and resident advocates say long-term care homes should employ strategies to reduce the risk of altercations, including closer supervision of residents at high risk, relocating them closer to nursing stations, separating residents with repeated conflicts, and adjusting roommate assignments or seating in shared spaces.
Each resident should have a care plan, and homes should train staff to be alert to a resident’s triggers and intervene quickly, dementia specialists say. Organised activities are essential for keeping residents occupied and engaged. Antipsychotics and other psychotropic medications are often prescribed, but they can increase the risk of falls, strokes, and even death.
An aide can be assigned to watch a particularly challenging resident one-on-one, but many places lack enough staff for protracted, dedicated supervision. Some assisted living facilities will tell a resident’s family they must hire a personal aide, who can cost thousands of dollars extra each month. In extreme situations, facilities might send a resident to an emergency room for evaluation or to a psychiatric hospital, or they might evict or discharge them.
Camille Russell, who served as Kansas’ long-term care ombudsman until 2024, said she observed nurses and aides were often “woefully undertrained” in basic elements of dementia care.
“We’ve gone too far away from making caring decisions,” Russell said. “There has to be a balance, and the balance has gotten too far to the profit side.”
A debilitating kick
Many physical altercations between residents result in a scratch or a bruise, but nonfatal scraps can leave permanent damage on deeply frail residents.
Linda Twiddy’s first weeks in a Chesapeake, Virginia, memory care unit in August 2024 were happy, her daughter, Barbara Howerin, said in a May interview. Twiddy, a former church secretary with vascular dementia, sang along with a visiting church choir, decorated pumpkins, and visited a cat cafe. The facility, The Vero at Chesapeake, charged Twiddy a one-time $6,825 move-in fee and monthly charges of $7,475, according to the lease.
Seven weeks after Twiddy started living there, a nurse called Howerin. She told her that her mother had been kicked in an altercation with another resident and was being sent to the hospital.
When Howerin arrived at the hospital, she was shocked by the extent of the injury. “It was like 10 inches long by 6 inches wide, the whole front of her shin,” she said. “The calf was just like dangling down.”
According to an internal facility incident report obtained by the family, an aide heard Twiddy scream for help and raced over to see a male resident with dementia trying to hit Twiddy while she sat on the floor in “a pool of blood.” The report said, “Linda was screaming, ‘Get him away from me; he pushed and kicked me.'”
The man had prior episodes of aggression, according to documents Twiddy’s family obtained in a lawsuit they brought against The Vero in Chesapeake Circuit Court. At his previous facility, a progress note from 2023 stated he was “becoming very aggressive in tone and actions towards residents and staff.” He “grabbed another resident by the wrists and pushed her,” according to the note. He was sent to an emergency room for evaluation of agitation, according to a hospital report. It did not make clear whether he was discharged back to the facility or elsewhere.
Agitation tied to pain
The male resident’s medical records at The Vero said he was diagnosed with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, agitation, and anxiety, according to his doctor’s deposition. He had chronic pain in his back and trouble sleeping. He could answer simple yes-or-no questions but had trouble providing more extensive answers and couldn’t communicate that he was in pain, she testified. His behavioural changes usually occurred when he had a urinary tract infection, the doctor said.
When he was agitated, aides could sometimes calm him by turning on the television so he could watch his beloved New England Patriots, one aide testified in a deposition. A former aide said she tried to avoid dealing with him altogether. “If you went up to him and he was agitated, he’d reach out to try to grab you,” she testified. If he had that cane, he would swing it or punch at you.
In a court filing, The Vero denied allegations by Twiddy’s family that it should have protected residents from him. The filing said the Vero complied with all standards of care and that any injuries Twiddy sustained “were caused by her own negligence” or acts of others.
In their investigation of the incident, Virginia regulators alleged the Vero had failed to assume responsibility for the health, safety, and well-being of its residents. The inspection report said The Vero pledged to appropriately staff the memory care unit based on the number of residents and to ensure someone completed rounds at least every two hours during sleeping hours.
Twiddy underwent three surgeries at the hospital for her leg, including a skin graft, then spent a month in rehabilitation. “She was never able to walk again,” her son, Doug Twiddy, said in a May interview.
The family moved Linda Twiddy to a different memory care facility where the nursing station had a clear view of all the rooms. She lived there until her death earlier this year.
The lawsuit was settled on confidential terms in early June. Carlton Bennett, the family’s attorney, declined to comment. In an email, Lauren Rogers, a spokesperson for Sinceri Senior Living, which operates The Vero, said the company was pleased the legal case had been resolved but could not comment further, citing confidentiality and patient privacy.
“The Vero at Chesapeake is committed to providing a caring, supportive environment where resident health, safety, and well-being remain our highest priorities,” she said.
A history of violence
After Attilio Cecchetto was fatally bludgeoned at Sunrise Post Acute, his adult children and their attorney, Jody Moore, discovered disturbing details about Sam Ato Timaloa. He had been imprisoned in 1999 after being convicted of raping an underage girl and sentenced in 2008 to 24 years in prison for attempted murder involving domestic violence, according to Riverside County court records. His public defender declined to comment.
Cecchetto’s sons, Moore, and her colleagues at Moore Hutchins & Moore also learned more about the home’s owner, PACS Group, a publicly traded company with more than 300 long-term care facilities. Last year, PACS earned $191 million on revenue of $5.3 billion, according to its annual securities filing.
In the lawsuit the Cecchettos and their father’s widow filed against PACS, they accused the company’s founders, Jason Murray and Mark Hancock, of draining resources from their nursing homes to pay for the chain’s expansion and swell their personal wealth.
The two had earned more than $650 million through stock sales since taking the company public and bought two private luxury jets, according to the lawsuit and securities filings. PACS has also purchased corporate sponsorships for Utah sports teams even though it owns no nursing homes in the state, the lawsuit said.
California regulators fined Sunrise $120,000 for failing to protect Cecchetto and for not taking Timaloa’s articulated dislike of noise into account when assigning rooms. Medicare issued its own $62,810 fine.
In legal papers responding to the Cecchettos’ lawsuit, PACS denied negligence for his death and alleged that he “failed to exercise ordinary care on his own behalf for his own safety.” It has sued to overturn the $120,000 state fine, saying it was issued too late and that Sunrise “did what might reasonably be expected of a long-term health care facility licensee acting under similar circumstances” to comply with state rules.
Police photographed Attilio Cecchetto’s bed after he was taken to a hospital. He died two days later.
The Cecchettos’ lawsuit asks for a judge to impose robust procedures PACS homes must follow for admissions, staff training, room changes, and the reporting of altercations between residents. The suit asks for a court-appointed monitor to oversee compliance. In its written statement to KFF Health News, PACS said “important context” would come out during the process and declined further comment.
In an interview, Cecchetto’s three sons, Dino, Gino, and Marco, described their father’s life. He spent his childhood on a farm in Italy, growing up under Benito Mussolini. After World War II he moved to Canada, where he learned to tile and lay marble and terrazzo, a decorative flooring material made of chips of stone, glass, or other materials embedded in cement or resin. He relocated to California in the early 1960s, became naturalised, and worked as a tile journeyman and a contractor for decades.
“We don’t want such an incident to happen to somebody again,” Gino Cecchetto said. “With the life he led, he deserved a quiet, dignified death. Instead, he ended his life in pain and fear.”
DATA METHODOLOGY
KFF Health News’ analysis of federal nursing home inspections focused on citations for violations of Medicare and Medicaid regulations stating that each resident has the right to be free of abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
The analysis looked at the most serious levels of citations, those in which inspectors determined that one or more residents had been harmed or that the facility’s actions caused — or were likely to place residents in immediate jeopardy of — serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. We reviewed the reports since January 2024 and tallied those that explicitly described resident-to-resident altercations.
We conducted a more granular analysis of a subset of the inspection reports from January through March 2026 involving harm or immediate jeopardy. Each report was reviewed and categorised according to the type of abuse, neglect, or exploitation.
KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
China’s expanding role in Kyrgyzstan has become increasingly hard to ignore.
During the first half of 2026, Kyrgyzstan issued some 61,000 work visas, according to the Foreign Ministry’s Consular Department, with about 60 per cent going to Chinese citizens.
That influx of Chinese workers is part of a wider economic expansion.
Nearly 7,000 Chinese companies, associations, and other organisations have been registered in Kyrgyzstan over the past three years, according to official statistics.
Chinese firms are involved in many of the country’s largest infrastructure, mining, and energy projects, some involving leases of state land for up to 49 years.
China is also Kyrgyzstan’s largest bilateral creditor. The Export-Import Bank of China holds about $1.6 billion, or 28 percent, of Kyrgyzstan’s $8.9 billion external public debt.
Many Kyrgyz find it difficult to accept the arrival of so many Chinese workers in a country of just over 7 million people, where hundreds of thousands leave to work abroad, mainly in Russia, and remittances sustain many households.
The situation has fuelled concerns over jobs, land, natural resources, and national sovereignty, with many ordinary Kyrgyz expressing concerns that the Central Asian nation’s leaders are not taking their interests into account.
Small Incidents, Big Reactions
Those concerns have increasingly surfaced online, where even small incidents involving Chinese nationals can quickly become national controversies.
Public discontent flared recently after videos of several incidents involving Chinese nationals circulated widely online.
Videos appeared showing Chinese citizens allegedly using electric equipment to catch fish in the protected Arpa highlands. The incident prompted public anger online and calls for authorities to investigate possible violations of environmental rules.
More backlash erupted after footage circulated showing Chinese visitors swimming in restricted areas along the shores of Issyk-Kul, areas where locals are prohibited from entering.
Social media users also shared allegations that Chinese nationals had illegally captured wild birds.
The posts quickly tapped into broader public frustration over what many saw as unequal enforcement of the law and special treatment for Chinese citizens in Kyrgyzstan, turning individual incidents into a wider debate about China’s role in the country.
One widely shared Facebook post asked, “Is China taking over Kyrgyzstan?” after publishing registration documents showing that Kyrgyz authorities had registered an organisation called the Association for Peaceful Reunification of Central Asia and China.
Comments ranged from concerns about Kyrgyzstan’s sovereignty to calls for legal and linguistic review of the claims.
Another widely circulated comment criticised Kyrgyzstan’s visa-free regime with China, sarcastically thanking President Sadyr Japarov “for introducing a visa-free regime for the Chinese” and arguing that the policy benefits Chinese visitors while Kyrgyz citizens still require visas to travel to China.
Fuel For Public Frustration
Political scientist Venera Saipidin said she believes the government has failed to address public concerns by providing clear information about Chinese migration and employment.
She said the authorities have not been transparent about how long Chinese citizens remain in Kyrgyzstan after arriving for work, leaving many public questions unanswered.
“The authorities should clearly state how many Chinese have entered and how many have left. Otherwise, vague disputes among the public are intensifying day by day.”
Bishkek-based political analyst Kuban Abdymen warned that authorities risk deepening public frustration if they fail to ensure equal enforcement of the law for all foreign nationals.
“The government should take public opinion into account and strictly enforce the law to prevent Chinese citizens in Kyrgyzstan from acting arrogantly or taking matters into their own hands,” he said.
The China Taboo
The latest backlash has revived a broader political dispute that intensified last month when activist and politician Mavlyan Askarbekov was detained after criticising the growing presence of Chinese citizens in Kyrgyzstan, including their involvement in small- and midsize businesses. Authorities accused him of inciting ethnic, national, religious, and regional hatred over his social media posts. He remains in pretrial detention.
A day after his arrest, Japarov defended the use of foreign workers for major projects and criticised those who, he said, exaggerated China’s role.
“Bloggers, opposition figures and self-promoting populist politicians are creating obstacles by spreading claims such as ‘they have flooded in, they have taken over.’ We must put an end to these claims and stop such actions decisively,” he said.
“Where we have the capacity, we build ourselves. But for things that we cannot do — where we lack engineers, experience, or the necessary expertise — we seek assistance from neighbouring countries. If we simply sit and say, ‘We will build everything ourselves,’ projects built by our engineers would take 15 to 20 years,’ Japarov added.
Securitisation of Chinese Investment
While the government has defended Chinese involvement as necessary for development, concerns over how such projects are decided and implemented remain widespread.
Filip Noubel, editor at large at Global Voices and an expert on China and Central Asia, said the disconnect between decision-makers and local communities has fuelled resentment around Chinese investment.
“It is all decided with elites in Bishkek who benefit directly and indirectly from such contracts, with little or no consideration of what local communities might think or need and how, if ever, they can benefit directly economically or also be affected negatively — from environmental issues to daily interaction with Chinese workers and colleagues.
“Most importantly, nationalism can be instrumentalised by groups who portray any Chinese investment as a threat.”
For Noubel, this environment has contributed to what he describes as the “securitisation” of Chinese investment abroad, when the safety of Chinese investors and workers becomes part of official state-to-state security cooperation rather than simply a matter of business operations.
“Such an environment explains partially why Chinese companies, often but not always state-owned and embedding themselves in the larger narrative of [the Belt and Road Initiative], seek protection — legal, physical, and political — and rely on their government to negotiate or impose a diverse set of rules, documents, and best practices that can better ensure their safety and the safety of their employees.”
Forced To Respond
Despite Japarov’s efforts to defend China-related policies and criticise their opponents, growing public anger online prompted authorities to respond.
On July 14, officials said they had begun briefing foreign construction workers across the country on complying with Kyrgyz law following a series of incidents involving alleged illegal fishing, hunting, public disorder, and drinking alcohol in public.
The same day, bloggers seen as close to Japarov’s administration published what they said was the passport of a Chinese citizen accused of illegal fishing, claiming he had been deported.
Separately, the Justice Ministry confirmed it had revoked the registration of the Association for Promoting the Peaceful Reunification of Central Asia and China after the organisation became the focus of widespread criticism on social media. The ministry did not immediately explain the reasons for its decision.
Microsoft has given Exchange Online administrators some welcome breathing room by delaying the retirement of a widely used PowerShell authentication method. The company now plans to begin removing support for the -Credential parameter from Exchange Online PowerShell module releases starting in December 2026.
The parameter had previously been scheduled for removal in July 2026. The revised timetable allows IT departments several extra months to identify affected scripts, replace older authentication methods and test updated automation before the change is enforced. Microsoft said the delay followed customer feedback, but it continues to recommend that organisations begin migrating immediately rather than wait for the new deadline.
What Microsoft Has Changed
The planned change affects the -Credential parameter used with two important PowerShell commands:
Connect-ExchangeOnline
Connect-IppsSession
These commands allow administrators to connect to Exchange Online and Security and Compliance PowerShell. In older scripts, the -Credential parameter may be used to supply a username and password stored in a PowerShell credential object.
Microsoft originally planned to remove the parameter in July 2026. It has now postponed that step until Exchange Online PowerShell module versions are released from the beginning of December 2026. Scripts that continue to use the parameter may fail after an administrator installs one of those newer module versions.
Why the Credential Parameter Is Being Retired
Microsoft is gradually moving customers away from authentication methods that depend on stored usernames and passwords.
Password-based automation can create security risks, especially when credentials are
Hard-coded inside scripts
Stored in unsecured configuration files
Shared between administrators
Used by unattended scheduled tasks
Not protected by multifactor authentication
Left unchanged for long periods
Modern authentication methods provide stronger controls and reduce the need to store reusable passwords. Microsoft has already disabled Basic authentication across Exchange Online tenants for many traditional connection methods as part of its broader security strategy.
The retirement of [name] -Credential is part of this ongoing effort. Instead of passing a username and password to a script, organisations are encouraged to use authentication methods designed for interactive users, applications and automated workloads.
Why Exchange Online Administrators Needed More Time
Although the security reasons are clear, replacing the parameter is not always a quick job.
Many organisations have built up years of automation around Exchange Online PowerShell. These scripts may handle essential tasks, such as:
Creating and updating mailboxes
Managing distribution groups
Producing compliance reports
Reviewing mailbox permissions
Applying retention settings
Managing mail-flow rules
Updating user attributes
Running scheduled security checks
Finding every script that it contains -Credential can be difficult, particularly in large organisations with multiple IT teams, service accounts and third-party support providers.
Once an affected script is found, administrators must choose an alternative authentication method, rewrite the connection process and test the entire workflow. Even a small authentication change can interrupt a business-critical task if the replacement is not properly configured.
The delay therefore provides administrators more time to carry out a controlled migration rather than rushing changes into production. The Register reported that scripts relying on the parameter could break and take down established automation workflows once support is removed.
When Will Existing Scripts Stop Working?
The timeline has two important stages.
First, the -Credential parameter will be removed from Exchange Online PowerShell module versions released beginning in December 2026. An affected script could therefore stop working when the organisation updates to a new version of the module.
Second, Microsoft plans to retire the underlying authentication flow on the server side at a later date. Once that happens, keeping an older PowerShell module will no longer provide a lasting workaround. Microsoft has warned that the parameter will eventually stop functioning even in older module versions.
This means administrators should not treat the delay as a permanent escape route. Avoiding module updates may temporarily reduce disruption, but it can also prevent organisations from receiving security improvements, bug fixes and new features.
What Administrators Should Do Now
The additional time should be used to create a structured migration plan.
Start by searching script repositories, scheduled-task servers, Azure Automation accounts and administrative workstations for references to:
-Credential
Administrators should also review scripts using:
Connect-ExchangeOnline
Connect-IppsSession
Finding those commands does not automatically mean that a script is affected, but it identifies likely candidates for further inspection.
Next, classify each script according to how it runs. An interactive script used by an administrator may require a different replacement from an unattended task that runs overnight.
Organisations should then:
Identify the script owner and business purpose.
Record where and how often the script runs.
Select a supported authentication method.
Test the replacement in a non-production environment.
Confirm that the account or application has only the permissions it needs.
Monitor the updated script for errors.
Remove stored passwords and unused service accounts.
Microsoft recommends moving away from the parameter as soon as possible, despite extending the published timetable to December 2026.
Possible Modern Authentication Alternatives
The correct replacement depends on the type of workload.
For interactive administration, administrators can use modern sign-in methods that support Microsoft Entra ID and multifactor authentication.
For unattended automation, organisations may consider app-only authentication using an application identity and a certificate. Managed identities may also be suitable for supported automation hosted in Azure.
Other supported connection approaches may include access-token-based authentication in specific scenarios. The final choice should be based on Microsoft’s current documentation, the environment in which the script runs and the permissions required.
The main objective is to remove dependence on stored user passwords while preserving reliable automation.
Legacy username-and-password authentication
Interactive modern authentication
Certificate-based app authentication
Managed identity
Security Benefits of Migrating Early
Replacing the legacy parameter can deliver benefits beyond avoiding script failures.
Modern authentication can help organisations:
Reduce password exposure
Apply stronger identity controls
Limit application permissions
Improve auditability
Remove unnecessary service accounts
Support multifactor authentication
Reduce the impact of stolen credentials
Migration also gives administrators the opportunity to review old scripts that may have excessive permissions or that may no longer be required.
A script written several years ago might connect using a highly privileged administrator account even though it performs only a limited reporting task. Rebuilding the authentication process is a valuable opportunity to apply least-privilege access and improve the organisation’s security posture.
Why Waiting Until December Is Risky
It is tempting to leave existing automation unchanged until the final weeks before the deadline. That approach carries several risks.
Large environments may contain more affected scripts than expected. Some may be owned by former employees, hidden inside scheduled tasks or provided by outside suppliers. Testing may also expose application-permission issues, certificate-management problems or dependencies on older modules.
A rushed migration increases the likelihood of the following:
Broken administrative jobs
Delayed mailbox provisioning
Missing compliance reports
Failed security checks
Emergency use of insecure workarounds
Starting early allows teams time to prioritise important workflows and resolve problems without adding unnecessary operational pressure.
What the Delay Means for Businesses
For businesses, the announcement reduces the immediate risk of disruption but does not remove the need for action.
Small organisations may have only a few scripts to review. Larger enterprises, managed service providers and public-sector bodies may have hundreds of automated Exchange Online processes operating across different departments.
IT leaders should treat the extension as a planning window. They should ensure that administrators have sufficient time, documentation and testing resources to complete the migration safely.
The change may also affect software vendors whose products connect to Exchange Online PowerShell using older authentication methods. Organisations should contact their suppliers to confirm that supported updates will be available before Microsoft retires the parameter.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Microsoft removing from Exchange Online PowerShell?
Microsoft is retiring the -Credential parameter from the Connect-ExchangeOnline and Connect-IppsSession commands.
When will the change begin?
The removal is now expected to begin with Exchange Online PowerShell module releases starting in December 2026.
Will older module versions continue working?
They may continue working temporarily, but Microsoft plans to retire the underlying server-side authentication flow later. At that point, the parameter will stop functioning even with older modules.
Which scripts are affected?
Scripts and automation workflows that are used -Credentialto connect to Exchange Online or Security and Compliance PowerShell will be affected.
Should administrators wait until December?
No. Microsoft recommends transitioning as soon as possible so organisations have enough time to identify update and test affected automation.
Conclusion
Microsoft’s decision gives Exchange Online administrators valuable additional time, but the direction remains unchanged. Password-based PowerShell connections using the -Credential parameter are being phased out, and affected scripts will eventually need to adopt modern authentication.
Administrators should use the extension to locate legacy automation, choose secure alternatives and test every important workflow well before December 2026. The delay is breathing room—not a cancellation—and organisations that begin the work early will be far less likely to face broken scripts or emergency fixes when the retirement takes effect.
Tens of thousands of Iranians have flocked to sign an online petition with a rare but pointed message to the country’s hard-liners: Go fight the war against the United States yourselves.
Within a day of appearing on the online platform Karzar, more than 100,000 people — and the number continues to climb — demanded in the petition that members of Iran’s ultraconservative Paydari Front political faction be sent to the country’s southern war zones — where US air strikes have focused much of their attention to “better understand the realities on the ground.”
The campaign is a response to the Paydari Front’s opposition to any negotiation between Iran and the United States, which has continued even as American strikes hit Iran’s southern coastal cities.
Signatories, in a rare public showing of the depth of anger over the continued fighting, argue that hard-line factions, lacking firsthand experience of conditions in the south, are making decisions from a distance that put ordinary lives at risk.
Iranian authorities say almost 40 people have been killed in southern Iran over six consecutive nights of air strikes and accuse Washington of bombing civilian infrastructure. US Central Command (CENTCOM) says it is degrading Iran’s military capabilities.
A parallel online campaign calls for prominent anti-negotiation lawmakers — including Hamid Rasaei, Amirhossein Sabeti, and Mahmud Nabavian — to be sent personally to Hormuz Island, which lies in the Persian Gulf, just offshore from the port city of Bandar Abbas.
Local media have also picked up on the growing discontent among Iranians over the war, especially with the destruction in southern Iran.
The Tehran-based reformist daily newspaper Sazandegi wrote in a commentary on the petition that “one cannot sit at home under an air conditioner and prescribe war” for soldiers in the scorching heat on Hormuz Island.
The campaign, it said, is less an online spat than a symbol of genuine public anger from people who’ve shouldered millions of dollars in power grid damage and brutal summer blackouts and now want war’s armchair theorists to face the consequences on the ground themselves.
The centrist paper Jomhuri-ye Eslami struck a similar note, arguing that those who “chant for war and disparage negotiators” should go south themselves.
Their leaders, it noted, fled the front during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s, only claiming battlefield-hero status once it ended — a contradiction that has become fodder for satire.
Hard-Liners Grow Louder, But Do They Have Power?
Hard-line figures close to the Paydari Front have intensified calls for revenge against the United States over the death of former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, killed in joint US-Israeli strikes on February 28, while rejecting any continuation of talks with Washington.
Its lawmakers have been sharply critical of President Masud Pezeshkian, Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, who doubles as Iran’s chief negotiator, for their push to hold talks with Washington.
Paris-based analyst Reza Alijani described the hard-liners’ renewed voice as an aftershock of Khamenei’s funeral earlier this month, which reopened old wounds and gave them a platform to push their staunch views.
They are not a unified bloc, he said; some are rivals of the negotiating team, others share an apocalyptic worldview aligned with Khamenei’s own, while some are simply reacting to the moment. Israeli infiltration and Russian interests also may be amplifying the noise, Alijani said.
Alijani noted, however, that despite their rhetoric, this particular sect of hard-liners holds no real power at the top. After all, he argued, military, political and technocratic figures alike within the Supreme National Security Council voted for negotiations with Washington.
Establishment Figures Split Publicly
Ayatollah Alireza Arafi, deputy head of the Assembly of Experts, urged officials to halt talks and treat the existing memorandum of understanding — a deal signed last month that aimed to halt fighting as the two sides negotiated a peace deal — as void.
Ali Khomeini, a grandson of the Islamic republic’s founder, said recently that anyone seeking peace through negotiation is a “traitor.”
The remarks drew backlash among ordinary Iranians who are suffering from the war and want peace.
Reformist journalist Milad Alavi wrote on X that it is the Iranian people — not officials posturing from podiums — who should decide between peace and war, calling for a referendum on whether to negotiate as laid out under Articles 6 and 59 of the constitution.
The people’s will “is the final word”, not comments from the likes of Khomeini’s grandson, he wrote.
Qalibaf has defended continuing talks with Washington despite the escalation, saying negotiation is not capitulation but, alongside war, part of a strategy to protect national interests.
Referencing Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s statement last month about the talks, Alijani argued that Khamenei is adopting a two-way approach: rejecting negotiations in principle publicly, while quietly permitting direct talks with the United States at lower levels.
Alijani said as long as that continues, negotiations will proceed even as hard-line rhetoric runs in parallel — though Iran’s infrastructure and public fate remain effectively hostage to the Hormuz standoff for now.
He expects the confrontation to end back at the table because neither side believes a military solution works, and after further retaliatory strikes, talks are likely to resume — given “shaky support” in the US for Trump’s strategy while Iran also remains in dire economic straits. Hard-line voices, he said, will ultimately be reined in.
This comes as the Jomhuri-ye Eslami newspaper this week warned that news of strikes on southern Iran risks becoming as routine as traffic accidents.
It said a collapse of negotiations — tantamount to full-scale war returning — is precisely what Israel wants and urged religious leaders to push talks toward success, denying adversaries any pretext.
Calls to close the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait alongside the Strait of Hormuz, it argued, betray foreign actors posing as allies — an implicit reference to Russia — and it urged officials to confront such infiltration directly to keep Iran from the brink of war.
The Bab-el-Mandeb Strait is another major global maritime transit chokepoint between Yemen on the Arabian Peninsula and Djibouti and Eritrea in the Horn of Africa.
Analysts fear Iran could mobilise its Houthi proxy forces in Yemen to target shipping in the Bab al-Mandab Strait, through which roughly 10 per cent of the world’s seaborne oil passes.
Lewis Hamilton says he is hopeful that Ferrari can match his rivals as the Belgian Grand Prix weekend proceeds “more than expected” despite conceding the Italian team’s deficit in Friday practice.
Hamilton was close to the pace in first practice as he finished a tenth behind Red Bull’s Max Verstappen, but he was seventh behind Mercedes’ Cammy Antonelli as the world championship leader topped the second session.
Antonelli leads his Mercedes team-mate George Russell at the top of the standings with 25 points, while Hamilton is third with seven points as he seeks a record eighth F1 title.
Hamilton, who has been in fine form with four podiums in his last five races, can at least take the consolation of finishing ahead of team-mate Charles Leclerc in both sessions.
Hamilton said, “It was a very good day overall: positive, paced, and a relatively clean session.”
“We’ve made some changes in P2. The gap seems a bit bigger today, at least in P2, than expected but hopefully we can try to close it tomorrow.
“But overall I generally feel good.”
Please consider using the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.
Britt highlighted the middle sector as the part of the track where Ferrari needed to focus on finding more speed.
“The others look really strong,” Hamilton added. “Red Bull look really strong. Mercedes got a lot of pace in the (second) session. McLaren looked good too.
“So, I don’t really know. Like I said, the car feels pretty decent but we’re lacking a little bit in the mid-range for some reason.
“So, we’re just looking to find out why that is and see if we can pick it up tomorrow.”
Please use the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.
Despite going fastest in FP2, Kimi Antonelli still says Mercedes has work to do before qualifying.
Verstappen is ‘not sure’ how much speed the car has.
Verstappen came flying out of the blocks on Friday when he topped the first practice but had to settle for third in the second practice and was almost half a second off the pace.
Red Bull are no longer running their rotating ‘Macarina’ rear wing after two crashes for Verstappen in Austria and Silverstone but it appears to have had little effect on their pace.
Verstappen says there was a direct balance and suggests Red Bull are close to maximising their package at Spa-Francorchamps.
Please consider using the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.
Max Verstappen brought out the red flag during the second practice session at the Belgian GP after travelling through gravel.
“We just focus on ourselves. Honestly, I can’t be disappointed. It’s been a good day for us,” he said.
“I’m not sure how much more there is than the others but sense-wise it’s been OK. In second practice, you’ll see more of what the real difference is, but hopefully we can get a little bit out of that towards qualifying.
Norris: We might be closer than Silverstone.
Norris was Antonelli’s closest challenger at 0.190s off the pace but has a 10-grid-place penalty for Sunday’s Belgian Grand Prix due to new control electronics that exceed the season’s permitted limit.
Likewise for Verstappen, Norris was satisfied with his Friday but warned that McLaren had been strong in second practice recently, only to fall back in qualifying.
Please consider using the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.
Lando Norris has reacted to the news that he will take a 10-place grid penalty for exceeding the power unit factor limit at the Belgian Grand Prix.
“We haven’t changed anything this weekend, so we expect nothing different,” said the reigning world champion.
“The Red Bulls don’t usually come on a Friday so we’ll arrive tomorrow and they’ll be just as fast, if not faster, so let’s wait and see.
“Maybe we changed it with Mercedes and the others didn’t so we’re still probably fourth fastest. But if we can fix things, we can be a bit closer than Silverstone.”
Sky Sports F1 Belgian GP schedule
Please consider using the Chrome browser for a more accessible video player.
Look back at some of the year’s most dramatic moments at the Belgian Grand Prix.
Saturday 18 July
9am: F3 sprint 11.15am: Belgium GP Practice Three (Session starts at 11.30am)
1.15pm: F2 sprint
2.15pm: Belgium GP Qualifying Build-up* 3pm: Belgian GP Qualifying*
Sunday, July 19
7.30am: F3 Feature Race
9am: F2 Feature Race
10.45am: Porsche Super Cup
12.30pm: Belgium GP build-up: Grand Prix Sunday 2pm: Belgian Grand Prix
4pm: Belgian GP reaction: checkered flag
The Eggcelerator Lab has announced the winners of its latest innovation program, highlighting a new generation of entrepreneurs who are transforming the future of egg-based beverages. The initiative encourages startups and food innovators to develop creative drinks that showcase the nutritional value, versatility, and sustainability of eggs.
As consumers increasingly seek high-protein, functional, and convenient beverages, the Eggcelerator Lab is helping connect traditional egg products with modern consumer preferences. The winning concepts show how refreshing drinks for athletes, busy professionals, health-conscious individuals, and anyone looking for nutritious alternatives can use eggs.
This year’s competition reinforces the growing role of food innovation in meeting changing dietary habits while creating exciting business opportunities within the beverage industry.
What Is the Eggcelerator Lab?
The Eggcelerator Lab is an innovation platform created to encourage the development of new products made with eggs. It brings together entrepreneurs, food scientists, nutrition experts, and industry leaders to create solutions that meet evolving consumer demands.
The programme provides participants with valuable support, including:
Product development guidance
Industry mentoring
Market research
Business coaching
Networking opportunities
Exposure to potential investors
Its primary goal is to discover innovative ideas that expand the use of eggs beyond traditional breakfast foods.
Why Egg Beverage Innovation Matters
Consumer preferences have shifted significantly in recent years. Many people now look for beverages that deliver more than simple hydration.
Modern consumers increasingly demand drinks that are
High in protein
Convenient for busy lifestyles
Made with natural ingredients
Functional and nutritious
Suitable for post-workout recovery
Sustainable and responsibly produced
Egg-based beverages offer many of these benefits while providing naturally occurring vitamins, minerals, and high-quality protein.
Innovative Ideas from This Year’s Competition
The latest Eggcelerator Lab finalists introduced a wide range of creative beverage concepts designed to meet different consumer needs.
Examples include:
Ready-to-drink protein shakes
Breakfast beverages
Recovery drinks for athletes
Functional wellness beverages
Smoothie-style drinks
High-protein coffee blends
Nutrient-rich meal replacement beverages
These products demonstrate that eggs can play a much larger role in modern nutrition than many consumers previously imagined.
Why Eggs Are an Excellent Beverage Ingredient
Eggs have long been recognised as one of nature’s most complete foods.
Key nutritional benefits include the following:
Complete Protein
Eggs contain all nine essential amino acids required for muscle growth and recovery.
Rich in Vitamins
They provide important nutrients, including:
Vitamin D
Vitamin B12
Riboflavin
Choline
Naturally Nutrient Dense
Eggs offer significant nutritional value without requiring large serving sizes.
These qualities make them an attractive ingredient for innovative beverage manufacturers.
Supporting Startup Innovation
One of the biggest strengths of the Eggcelerator Lab is its support for startups.
Early-stage companies often face challenges such as:
Limited funding
Product testing
Regulatory compliance
Manufacturing scale-up
Market access
The programme helps innovators overcome these obstacles by connecting them with experienced mentors and industry partners.
This support allows promising ideas to move from the laboratory into commercial production.
Meeting Consumer Health Trends
Health-conscious consumers continue to influence food and beverage development.
Current trends include demand for:
High-protein diets
Convenient nutrition
Functional foods
Clean-label products
Sustainable ingredients
Better breakfast solutions
Egg beverages align well with many of these priorities, making them attractive to both manufacturers and consumers.
Sustainability Remains a Key Focus
Innovation today is about more than nutrition.
Many participants in the Eggcelerator Lab also focus on improving sustainability by exploring:
Responsible sourcing
Efficient manufacturing
Reduced food waste
Environmentally friendly packaging
Lower production emissions
Sustainability has become an important factor influencing consumer purchasing decisions across the food industry.
Opportunities for the Beverage Industry
The success of the Eggcelerator Lab demonstrates growing commercial interest in egg-based beverages.
Potential market opportunities include the following:
Sports nutrition
Children’s nutrition
Healthy breakfast drinks
Senior nutrition
Meal replacement products
Functional wellness beverages
As consumer awareness increases, analysts believe the market for innovative protein drinks will continue expanding.
Challenges Facing Egg Beverage Innovation
Despite the exciting opportunities, several challenges remain.
Manufacturers must consider:
Consumer Education
Some consumers may be unfamiliar with egg-based beverages.
Clear communication about taste, nutrition, and safety is essential.
Product Stability
Developing beverages with excellent texture, flavour, and shelf life requires advanced food science.
Market Competition
Protein beverages already include products made from:
Dairy
Whey
Soy
Pea protein
Oats
Egg-based drinks must clearly communicate their unique advantages.
The Future of Egg-Based Drinks
The future appears promising for egg beverage innovation.
Advances in food technology continue improving:
Taste
Texture
Shelf stability
Nutritional value
Packaging
Production efficiency
As innovation continues, consumers may soon find egg-based beverages becoming a common feature in supermarkets, fitness centres, cafés, and convenience stores.
Programmes like the Eggcelerator Lab are helping to accelerate this transformation by encouraging creativity and supporting promising entrepreneurs.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Eggcelerator Lab?
The Eggcelerator Lab is an innovation programme that supports startups and entrepreneurs in developing new food and beverage products featuring eggs.
Why are egg beverages becoming popular?
Egg-based drinks provide high-quality protein, essential nutrients, convenience, and functional health benefits, making them attractive to health-conscious consumers.
Who benefits from egg-based beverages?
Athletes, busy professionals, older adults, students, and anyone seeking convenient, high-protein nutrition can benefit from these products.
What makes eggs a particularly effective ingredient for beverages?
Eggs contain complete protein, essential vitamins, minerals, and naturally occurring nutrients that support overall health.
What industries could benefit from Eggcelerator Lab innovations?
Sports nutrition, functional beverages, meal replacements, wellness products, and healthy convenience foods all stand to benefit from innovations developed through the Eggcelerator Lab.
Conclusion
The Eggcelerator Lab is playing an important role in shaping the future of food and beverage innovation. By encouraging entrepreneurs to explore new uses for eggs, the programme is helping create nutritious, convenient, and sustainable products that meet the needs of modern consumers.
As demand for high-protein and functional beverages continues to grow, egg-based drinks could become an increasingly familiar option on store shelves. With continued investment in research, technology, and startup support, the ideas emerging from the Eggcelerator Lab have the potential to influence the next generation of healthy beverages and open exciting opportunities across the global food industry.
The England 4-2 France result gave the Three Lions a memorable finish to their FIFA World Cup 2026 campaign, as Thomas Tuchel’s side produced one of their best performances of the tournament to secure third place with an emphatic victory over France.
After suffering a heartbreaking semi-final defeat to Argentina, England responded brilliantly in the bronze final by dominating from the opening whistle. France, who had lost to Spain in the other semi-final, struggled to contain England’s pace, pressing, and clinical finishing.
The victory gives England their best World Cup finish in decades and provides plenty of optimism ahead of future international competitions. England raced into a commanding lead with early goals from Declan Rice, Ezri Konsa and Bukayo Saka, before adding a fourth before half-time, leaving France with no route back into the match.
Match Snapshot
England overwhelmed France with an aggressive, attacking display from the first whistle.
The Three Lions controlled possession, won the midfield battle and created chances with impressive regularity. Their intensity forced France into repeated defensive mistakes, while England’s forwards punished almost every opportunity.
France’s experienced players found it difficult to settle into the match, allowing England to dictate the tempo throughout the opening half.
First-Half Domination
England quickly took control of the game.
Declan Rice opened the scoring early with a superb long-range strike, giving England the perfect start. The early breakthrough lifted confidence throughout the team.
Ezri Konsa doubled England’s advantage after a well-worked attacking move, before Bukayo Saka added a third before half-time with a composed finish.
England then scored a fourth before the interval to complete an outstanding opening 45 minutes and effectively decide the contest. Reports described England as fluid, energetic and clinical, while France looked disorganised and unable to respond.
England’s Standout Performers
Several England players delivered excellent performances.
Declan Rice
Rice was a dominant force in midfield throughout the match.
His early goal set the tone, and his passing, leadership and defensive work helped England control the game.
Bukayo Saka
Saka was a constant threat on the right wing.
His movement, pace and finishing troubled France throughout the match.
Ezri Konsa
Konsa not only scored but also produced a solid defensive display, limiting France’s attacking opportunities.
Marcus Rashford
Rashford stretched the French defence with intelligent runs and quick transitions, creating space for his teammates.
France Left Searching for Answers
France entered the match hoping to finish the tournament positively but never managed to find their rhythm.
Their attack struggled to create clear opportunities, while defensive mistakes allowed England far too much space.
Despite the presence of several world-class players, France looked second best in every department during the opening stages of the match.
Tactical Analysis
Thomas Tuchel deserves significant credit for England’s approach.
England’s tactics included:
High pressing
Quick passing combinations
Strong midfield control
Fast transitions
Clinical finishing
Organised defending
France found it difficult to build attacks because England pressed aggressively whenever possession changed hands.
The tactical discipline shown by England highlighted the progress made during the tournament.
What the Result Means
The England 4-2 France victory secures third place at the FIFA World Cup 2026.
Although missing out on the final was disappointing, finishing with a convincing win provides a strong platform for future tournaments.
Positive outcomes include the following:
World Cup bronze medals
Increased confidence
Valuable experience for younger players
Momentum heading into future international fixtures
For France, attention now turns to rebuilding after an inconsistent finish to the tournament.
Match Statistics
Competition: FIFA World Cup 2026
Round: Third-Place Playoff
Result: England 4–2 France
Venue: Miami Stadium, Miami
Winning Team: England
Watch the Match Highlights
If official highlights are available in your region, they’re the best way to relive England’s dominant performance.
(Embed the official FIFA or England Football highlights video once published.)
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won England vs France?
England defeated France 4-2 in the FIFA World Cup 2026 third-place playoff.
Why was the match played?
The fixture decided third place after both teams lost their World Cup semi-finals.
Who were England’s standout players?
Declan Rice, Bukayo Saka and Ezri Konsa were among England’s top performers, helping the Three Lions dominate the contest.
What does the final result mean for England?
England finish third at the FIFA World Cup 2026, ending their campaign with a convincing victory and valuable momentum for future competitions.
Conclusion
The England 4-2 France victory was a fitting end to England’s FIFA World Cup 2026 campaign. The Three Lions combined attacking quality, defensive discipline and tactical intelligence to overwhelm France and secure the bronze medal in style. While both teams will reflect on missed opportunities to reach the final, England can take pride in producing one of their strongest displays of the tournament. With a talented squad and encouraging performances throughout the competition, English football has a promising future.
The England vs France World Cup bronze final promises to be an entertaining encounter as two of Europe’s football giants battle for third place at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Although neither side reached the final, both teams will be eager to finish their tournament on a positive note by securing the bronze medal.
England narrowly lost to Argentina in the semi-finals, while Spain defeated France. Now both teams have one final opportunity to leave the tournament with a victory and reward their supporters with a strong finish.
Match Details
Fixture: England vs France
Competition: FIFA World Cup 2026 Third-Place Playoff
Venue: Miami Stadium, Miami, Florida
Kick-off: 10:00 PM (UK time), Saturday, 18 July 2026
Match: Bronze Final (Third-Place Playoff)
England vs France Preview
Both nations entered the tournament among the favourites to lift the World Cup and have shown their quality throughout the competition.
England impressed with disciplined defending and clinical finishing during the knockout rounds before falling to Argentina in a closely contested semi-final. The Three Lions will now look to finish their campaign with another strong performance.
France also enjoyed an excellent tournament, defeating several strong opponents before losing to Spain in the last four. Didier Deschamps’ side remains packed with world-class talent and will be determined to leave the United States with a medal.
With no second chance after this match, both managers may encourage a more attacking style than in the semi-finals.
England Team News
England are expected to assess several players after the physically demanding semi-final.
Possible areas to watch include:
Late fitness checks for players carrying minor knocks.
Squad rotation to keep the team fresh.
Opportunities for fringe players to feature in the starting lineup.
Managerial decisions will likely balance giving key players minutes with rewarding squad members who have contributed throughout the tournament.
France Team News
France are also expected to rotate their squad slightly following their defeat to Spain.
The coaching staff could:
Rest players with minor injuries.
Give younger players valuable World Cup experience.
Maintain a strong attacking lineup despite the disappointment of missing the final.
France’s impressive squad depth means they remain dangerous regardless of any changes.
England vs France Head-to-Head
The England vs France rivalry has produced several memorable matches over the years.
Recent meetings have generally been closely contested, with both teams enjoying periods of success. France have generally had the edge in major tournaments, while England have made significant progress in recent years under their current setup.
Fans can expect another tactical battle between two evenly matched sides.
Key Players to Watch
England
Creative midfielders who can unlock tight defences.
Pacey forwards who can threaten on the counterattack.
A solid defensive unit experienced in major international tournaments.
Individual moments of brilliance could prove decisive in such an evenly balanced contest.
Tactical Battle
England are expected to remain organised defensively while looking to attack quickly down the wide areas.
France typically dominate possession and create chances through fluid passing and technical quality in midfield.
Key tactical battles include the following:
Midfield control.
Set-piece effectiveness.
Counter-attacking opportunities.
Defensive concentration.
The team that makes fewer mistakes is likely to claim third place.
TV Channel and Live Stream
Supporters can watch England vs France through official FIFA World Cup broadcasters in their respective countries.
Depending on your location, coverage may be available through:
National free-to-air television.
Sports subscription channels.
Official broadcaster streaming platforms.
FIFA’s authorised broadcast partners.
Check your local listings for confirmed broadcast details before kick-off.
Today’s Odds
While betting markets can change up until kick-off, bookmakers generally view this match as closely balanced.
Typical market expectations include the following:
England Win: Slightly favoured or evenly priced
Draw (90 minutes): Competitive odds
France Win: Similar odds to England
Other popular betting markets include:
Both Teams to Score
Over 2.5 Goals
First Goalscorer
Correct Score
Total Corners
Always gamble responsibly.
Prediction
The England vs France clash promises to be an entertaining bronze final.
Both teams possess outstanding attacking talent and may play with greater freedom after missing out on the final. Defensive caution is still likely, but both teams should have chances.
England’s organised structure may give them a slight advantage, while France’s technical ability ensures they remain a constant threat throughout the match.
Predicted Score: England 2–1 France
Why This Match Matters
Although it is not the World Cup Final, the third-place playoff still carries importance.
Winning the bronze medal:
Ends the tournament with a win.
Improves FIFA rankings.
Rewards supporters with a victory.
Builds confidence for future international competitions.
Both teams will be motivated to finish their World Cup journey with success.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is England vs France?
The match takes place on Saturday, 18 July 2026, with kick-off at 10:00 PM (UK time).
Where is England vs France being played?
The World Cup bronze final is being played at Miami Stadium, Miami, Florida.
What is the England vs France match for?
It is the FIFA World Cup 2026 Third-Place Playoff, where the losing semi-finalists compete for the bronze medal.
Who is the favourite to win?
The match is considered very evenly balanced, with both England and France having strong squads capable of winning.
Conclusion
The England vs France World Cup Bronze Final may not decide the world champions, but it remains a prestigious fixture between two football powerhouses. With talented squads, experienced managers, and plenty of pride at stake, fans can expect an exciting and competitive contest. Whether England’s disciplined approach or France’s attacking flair proves decisive, the third-place playoff promises to be an entertaining conclusion to both teams’ World Cup campaigns.