Home Blog Page 94

Measles Alert: Cases Detected at Newark and Logan Airports Amid Holiday Travel Surge

1
Measles Alert: Cases Detected at Newark and Logan Airports Amid Holiday Travel Surge

Health officials are issuing urgent alerts after measles was detected at Newark Airport (EWR) and Boston’s Logan International Airport (BOS) during one of the busiest holiday travel periods of the year.

This development has raised significant public health concerns due to the virus’s extreme contagiousness and the high volume of travellers passing through these major hubs.

What We Know About the Cases

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health confirmed an individual with a confirmed case of measles was present in Terminal B at Logan Airport on the afternoon of December 23rd.

Separately, New Jersey health officials alerted the public that an infected traveller was at Newark Airport’s Terminal C on the morning of December 24th.

Authorities are actively identifying and directly notifying individuals who may have come into contact. However, given the nature of airport terminals—enclosed spaces with thousands of moving people—they are also issuing broad public warnings.

Why This Situation is a Serious Public Health Concern

Measles is not a mild illness. It is one of the most contagious viruses; an infected person can leave the virus suspended in the air for up to two hours.

Key Facts:

  • Transmission: Spreads through the air via coughing and sneezing.
  • Contagious Period: An infected person can spread the virus from four days before the signature rash appears to four days after.
  • Complications: Can lead to pneumonia, encephalitis (brain swelling), and hospitalisation. In rare cases, it can be fatal.

The timing of these exposures is particularly alarming, coinciding with peak holiday travel when Newark Airport and Logan Airport were at maximum capacity, increasing the potential for a wider outbreak.

Locations and Times of Potential Exposure

If you or your family travelled through these airports on these dates, please be aware of the specific details:

  • Boston Logan International Airport (BOS):
    • Location: Terminal B (which includes numerous airline gates and the international arrivals facility).
    • Time: Tuesday, December 23rd, from approximately 2:00 PM to 4:30 PM.
  • Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR):
    • Location: Terminal C.
    • Time: Sunday, December 24th, from approximately 8:30 AM to 11:30 AM.

Steps to Protect Yourself and Your Family

  1. Check Your Vaccination Status: The MMR (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) vaccine is highly effective. Two doses are about 97% effective at preventing measles. If you are unsure of your status, check with your doctor. Those born before 1957 are generally considered immune due to prior exposure.
  2. Monitor for Symptoms (Especially if You Were There): Symptoms typically appear 7 to 14 days after exposure and include:
    • High fever (may spike to over 104°F)
    • Cough, runny nose, and red/watery eyes
    • A red, blotchy rash typically begins on the face and spreads downward 2-4 days after the fever commences.
  3. If You Develop Symptoms:
    • Call Ahead: Do not visit a clinic, hospital, or doctor’s office without calling first. Tell them about your possible measles exposure and symptoms so they can stop the virus from spreading.
    • Isolate: Stay home and avoid contact with others, especially unvaccinated individuals, infants, and those with compromised immune systems.

The Bottom Line for Travelers

The detection of measles at Newark Airport and Logan Airport serves as a critical reminder that vaccine-preventable diseases remain a threat, especially in international travel hubs.

It points out the need for community immunity (herd immunity) to protect those who cannot be vaccinated, such as infants and the immunocompromised.

If you were at these locations during the specified times, stay vigilant for symptoms. For everyone else, this is an ideal time to verify your family’s immunisation records.

As we move through the respiratory virus season, staying up-to-date on vaccinations is our best defence against serious outbreaks.

“Great white sharks face extinction in the Mediterranean,” say researchers.

1
“Great white sharks face extinction in the Mediterranean,” say researchers.

Getty Images A great white shark moves towards the camera through clear, blue water. A shoal of small fish surround the large predator and its rows of pointed teeth are clearly visible Getty Images

Great white sharks in the Mediterranean Sea are in danger of disappearing, with illegal fishing contributing to their decline.

This is according to research by US scientists, working in partnership with UK charity Blue Marine Foundation. They say some of the most threatened species – including great white sharks – are being sold in North African fish markets.

Great whites are one of more than 20 Mediterranean shark species protected under international law, meaning it is illegal to fish for them or to sell them.

By monitoring fishing ports on the Mediterranean coast of North Africa, however, researchers discovered that at least 40 enormous white sharks have been killed there in 2025 alone.

James Glancy/Blue Marine A white shark's head sits on a table in a fish market. It is surrounded by other fish and appears to be for sale.  James Glancy/Blue Marine
Conservationists and scientists say they have seen protected species for sale in fish markets in North Africa

The BBC has also found, and independently verified, footage from social media of protected sharks being brought dead into North African ports.

One video showed a large great white being hauled ashore from a fishing boat in Algeria. Another, filmed in Tunisia, shows heads and fins of what appears to be a short-finned mako shark, which is also a threatened and protected species, being prepared for sale.

Last shark stronghold

James Glancy/Martin Stalker The image is captured by a drone and is looking directly down upon a research vessel - with crew and equipment visible on deck - and two smaller dinghies close by. The picture is taken at dusk and the sea surrounding the vessel looks dark, inky blueJames Glancy/Martin Stalker
The researchers worked from a vessel in the Strait of Sicily

Lead researcher, Dr Francesco Ferretti from the US university Virginia Tech, explained that many shark populations – white sharks in particular – had declined dramatically in the Mediterranean in recent decades.

“No other stretch of water is fished like the Mediterranean Sea,” he said, speaking to the BBC News science team while working on a research vessel off the coast of Sicily in late 2025.

“Industrial fishing is intensifying its impact, potentially leading to their extinction in the near future.”

The Mediterranean white shark population is now classified as Critically Endangered by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature.

In their latest attempt to find and study the predators, Dr Ferretti and his team worked in the Strait of Sicily – an area between Sicily and North Africa that has been identified as a “last stronghold” in the Mediterranean for several threatened shark species.

One key aim of their mission was to fit a satellite tracking tag onto a white shark – something that has never been done in the Mediterranean Sea.

To attempt this, the researchers brought more than three tonnes of fish bait – a shipping container packed with frozen mackerel and tuna scraps, as well as 500 litres of tuna oil to create a “fat slick” that many sharks would be able to smell from hundreds of metres away.

Despite working for two weeks – baiting the ocean, taking samples of seawater to search for shark DNA and using underwater cameras – the researchers did not manage to find any animals to tag.

They captured only a brief glimpse of one blue shark on their submarine cameras.

“It’s disheartening,” Dr Ferretti told us. “It just shows how degraded this ecosystem is.”

While the team was searching for surviving sharks, they also received reports that a juvenile great white had been caught and killed in a North African fishery – just 20 nautical miles from where they were working.

It is not clear whether that animal was accidentally caught in fishing gear, or if it was targeted.

Dr Ferretti and his team, though, estimate that more than 40 enormous white sharks have been caught around that coast. “This is a lot for a critically endangered population,” he said.

Sharks for sale

James Glancy/Blue Marine A conservationist, James Glancy, is pictured with two dead white sharks in the foreground. The image is posed by steps leading up to the doorway of a building. The sharks have been cut into several pieces and appear to be partially frozen James Glancy/Blue Marine
In 2023, James Glancy from Blue Marine conducted a visit to fish markets in Tunisia, where he observed the sale of protected sharks.

The researchers, with their colleagues in North Africa are monitoring several fishing ports in the region. Our collaboration with the BBC Forensics team reveals that countries such as Tunisia and Algeria catch, land, and sell protected sharks.

We found footage – posted on social media – of a great white being landed in a fishing port in Algeria and another large shark that appears to be a protected short-finned mako, being prepared for sale on a trolly in a fish market in Tunisia.

The rules that protect sharks are complicated. Currently, 24 threatened species have international legal protection – including mako, angel, threshers and hammerheads.

The EU and 23 nations around the Mediterranean have signed an agreement, which states that those species cannot be “retained on board, transhipped, landed, transferred, stored, sold or displayed or offered for sale”.

The international agreement states “they must be released unharmed and alive [where] possible”. Those rules do not tackle accidental bycatch and enforcement is variable from country to country.

Virginia Tech/Blue Marine The underwater image shows a mako shark swimming towards the camera in clear blue water. A bright yellow cylinder in the foreground is a container of fish bait to attract sharks Virginia Tech/Blue Marine
The researchers used baited underwater cameras to search the area for sharks

James Glancy from Blue Marine told BBC News that his investigation found multiple white sharks on sale in Tunisian fishing markets. But, he said, there was a paradoxical element of hope in the fact that white sharks were turning up for sale.

“It indicates that there is wildlife left,” he told BBC News. “And if we can preserve this, there is a chance of recovery.”

What can be done?

In poorer communities in North Africa, fishers who catch sharks might face the choice of whether to feed their family, or return a threatened species to the ocean.

Sara Almabruk from the Libyan Marine Biology Society says that most of the catches happening in North African waters are accidental, but adds: “Why would they throw sharks back into the sea when they need food for their children?

“If you train them in sustainable fishing, they won’t catch white sharks or any sharks.”

James Glancy from Blue Marine added that if countries around the Mediterranean worked together, “there is hope.

“But, he added, “we’ve got to act very quickly.”

Source link

Labor criticizes the Tory shadow minister for representing Roman Abramovich.

1

Getty Images Roman Abramovichgetty images
The UK government sanctioned Roman Abramovich in March 2022.

The Labour Party has criticised Conservative Shadow Attorney General Lord Wolfson for acting as a lawyer for sanctioned Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich.

Justice Minister Jack Richards said it was “inexcusable” for him to retain his position on the Tory frontbench while representing Mr Abramovich, arguing it risked a conflict of interest.

The Conservatives said the comments were “pure politics” and a “baseless smear”, adding that “barristers work for clients, not for causes”.

Lord Wolfson is part of the legal team representing the former owner of Chelsea Football Club in his court battle with the Jersey government.

The UK government banned Mr Abramovich in March 2022, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The accusation against the oligarch, who made his fortune in oil and gas, is that he has strong ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, a claim he denies.

More than £5.3 billion worth of assets linked to Mr Abramovich have been banned by the Jersey courts since their approval.

The Government of Jersey initiated an investigation in April 2022 to ascertain the origin of the funds, leading to a protracted legal dispute.

The Justice Minister claimed the case was blocking the transfer of funds from the sale of Mr Abramovich’s Chelsea FC, which the government wants to give to victims of the war in Ukraine.

In 2022, Mr. Abramovich said the £2.5 billion raised from the sale should be used for “all victims of the war”—meaning the Russians could also benefit.

In a letter to Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, Richards said, “Mr Abramovich’s position is that the transfer of funds cannot be completed until the end of the court case in Jersey in which Lord Wolfson is representing him.

“As Shadow Attorney General,

Lord Wolfson has a key role in setting Conservative Party policy.

“As a salaried representative of Mr Abramovich, he has a financial interest in the question of whether and when Mr Abramovich’s assets are transferred to benefit the people of Ukraine.”

In his letter, the minister raised a number of questions, including whether Lord Wolfson played a role in formulating the party’s position on transferring funds from the sale of Chelsea FC and whether he had declared an interest in it or recused himself from the process.

Richards said that the “cab rank rule”—the principle that a barrister must take any case within his area of expertise, regardless of the client—”should always be respected, but it cannot remove conflicts of interest or eliminate the responsibility of politicians to avoid such conflicts.”

He added, “Lord Wolfson’s ability to advise you in relation to this matter is clearly compromised by the fact that he is being paid to act on Mr Abramovich’s behalf.

“If he wishes to continue to represent clients whose interests are directly linked to the policies of the Government and HM the Opposition, then that is a matter for him – but he cannot do that while serving in your shadow cabinet.”

A Conservative Party spokesman responded by saying, “We have instructed Lord Wolfson in the ongoing legal proceedings in Jersey.” He has not been instructed on the Chelsea FC matter.

“Jake Richards’ comments are pure politics, and they show Labour still doesn’t understand how the bar works. Barristers work for clients, not causes.”

The spokesman accused Labor of “rank hypocrisy,” pointing out that Attorney General Lord Harmer, the government’s chief legal adviser, represented former Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams before becoming a minister.

He added, “The Conservative Party has led the way in supporting Ukraine and we remain committed to its cause. Suggesting otherwise would represent a new low for the Labour Party.

PA media Lord Wolfson speaking into the microphone. He is a bald man wearing glasses and a gray coat with a striped scarf.pa media
Lord Wolfson has served as Shadow Attorney General since November 2024.

There has been a delay in releasing the funds received from the sale of Chelsea FC, which are currently deposited in a British bank account, due to a standoff over how they should be used.

Under UK sanctions, Mr Abramovich cannot access the money, but the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea remain legally his.

Earlier this month, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer urged the oligarch to “pay up now” or face court action.

Source link

The hidden, grim reality of British drug mules is exposed as the Thai cannabis boom surges.

1

Thailand’s “wild weed waste” has added fuel to the fire today as a Mirror investigation reveals a boom in Thai cannabis farms has led to a large number of drug mules being snared by UK authorities.

recovery of ganja

Official figures obtained by the Mirror show that at least 23 tonnes of cannabis were seized at UK airports between January and November (Image: NCA)

Today, one of Britain’s most senior officials urged Britons seeking free holidays not to resort to drug trafficking to finance their trips.

The Mirror can today reveal that hundreds of smugglers coming to the UK this year alone have been busted – with Thailand’s “wild weed waste” fuelling the problem. Clear data shows that at least 800 smugglers were caught at airports until mid-November this year – that means police caught two mules every day.

This total is much more than the whole of 2024, when 750 smugglers were caught. About 640 of those arrested were travelling from Thailand.

where relaxed drug laws have led to a boom in cannabis production. Last year only 460 were arrested after arriving from Thailand.

Drug seizures at UK airports

Large quantities of drugs have been seized at UK airports in the past year, partly due to a boom in cannabis production in Thailand. (Image: NCA)

Criminal gangs lured gullible Britons with the promise of luxury holidays in exchange for the transportation of “packages”.

Several drug gangs have been caught around the world, including pregnant 19-year-old Bella Mae Cooley, 24-year-old young mother Cameron Bradford and 21-year-old former air hostess Charlotte Mae Lee.

But today Becky Wright, head of the NCA’s Borders Threat Team, warned, “Don’t risk your life for a free holiday.”

She told the Mirror: “Couriers are risking potentially life-changing penalties and prison sentences and we continue to target them as part of our ongoing efforts to break the supply chain.

“We continue to warn anyone who is tempted by a quick payday or free holiday in exchange for smuggling drugs such as cannabis:

The risks are too great and the chances of getting caught are too high. It is not worth it. The NCA works with law enforcement partners, such as border forces at home and those abroad,

to attack high-risk routes, seize drug shipments and disrupt the organised crime groups involved, impacting their profits. Works together.”

bella me coolie

Bella May Cooley, 18, said she was tricked into carrying drugs from Thailand to Georgia but eventually made a deal to return to the UK. (Image: Facebook)

Official data obtained by this paper shows that at least 23 tonnes of cannabis were seized at UK airports between January and November in 2025. The authorities seized approximately 17 tonnes of cannabis at Heathrow and at least 3.8 tonnes at Manchester airports.

The National Crime Agency said at least 800 couriers have been arrested at UK airports so far in 2025, with around 530 at Heathrow, 120 at Manchester Airport and around 30 at Gatwick, and smaller numbers elsewhere.

About 80% of those arrested travelled from Thailand, with notable ones coming from the US, Canada and South Africa. And about two-thirds of those arrested were British, with notable numbers from the US, Malaysia and Canada.

Cameron Bradford, 21

Cameron Bradford, 21, of Knebworth, Herts, was detained at Munich Airport on April 21 as she tried to collect her luggage.

Earlier this year Thai authorities said British influencers and backpackers were being lured by a ruthless drug mule gang using the Telegram messaging app.

Police Lieutenant General Phanurat Lukboon, secretary general of Thailand’s Narcotics Control Board (ONCB) office, said young travellers were being offered a free trip to Thailand, alcohol and up to £2,000 in spending money.

They agreed to smuggle the cannabis into the United Kingdom in return. Lieutenant Lukboon said, “These people recruited to the UK are not deceived.”

They are lured with free tours, accommodation, and food in Thailand, as well as pocket money in exchange for an agreement to bring cannabis back to the UK.”

Image of Charlotte May Lee during the holidays

Charlotte May Lee, 21, was jailed in a terrifying Sri Lankan prison after allegedly trying to smuggle drugs worth £1.2 million from Thailand to Sri Lanka. (Image: instagram.com/charlottemaylee)

Today Chris Hobbs, a former Special Branch officer for border control, said he was “shocked” by the scale of cannabis smuggling into Britain, where it remains a Class B drug.

In 2002 he led Operation Airbridge, which deployed UK police and customs agents to Jamaican airports to stop smugglers from ingesting cocaine and supplying the drug to Britain.

Mr. Hobbs said, “It is interesting to find out whether these young travellers are being recruited in the UK or overseas.”

They will probably have to hand over their drugs to a named contact or someone who recruited them in the first place in order to get some items back.

They may have been recruited abroad, with gangs seeking naive Britons who they thought could pass through Heathrow or Gatwick.

Often mules will be told that customs in the UK are not really interested in cannabis coming through, which, quite honestly, was true until a few years ago.

Sophie Bannister and Levi-April Whaley

In 2022 glamorous pals Sophie Bannister and Levi-April Whalley, both from Blackburn, were found with cannabis in bags (Image: male)

They falsely claim that if you get caught, nothing serious will happen and you won’t go to jail because the prisons are full. So if you get caught, it’s no big deal. And if you don’t get caught, you’ve got away, and you’ll make a lot of money from it.”

This summer there has been a spate of cases in Britain, such as that of 18-year-old Bella Cooley, who was tricked into carrying drugs from Thailand to Georgia.

She claimed her luggage containing 31 pounds of cannabis was taken to the airport and placed in the hold of the plane when she was flying from Bangkok in May.

Gangs tortured Bella, from County Durham, into smuggling £200,000 worth of cannabis, a court heard.

Dan Warburton at Cannabis Farm

Earlier this year Mirror reporter Dan Warburton gained access to one of the dozens of cannabis farms growing on Koh Samui. (Image: Phil Harris)

Elsewhere, a British couple claiming to be tourists from Thailand were caught at an airport in Spain with more than 33 kilograms of cannabis in their suitcase.

The pair were caught by suspicious policemen at Valencia airport after showing a “nervous and evasive attitude” and are now behind bars on drug trafficking charges.

Meanwhile, young mother Cameron Bradford, 21, from Knebworth, was detained at Munich Airport in Germany for smuggling cannabis in her bag while flying from Thailand.

And 21-year-old rising travel influencer Charlotte May Lee was caught carrying £1.2 million of drugs from Thailand to Sri Lanka.

The former air hostess’s suitcase was said to be filled with 46 kilograms of a synthetic cannabis strain known as Kush.

Previously glamorous friends Sophie Bannister and Levi-April Whalley, both from Blackburn, were found with cannabis in their bags when they were flying back to the UK from New York in 2022.

Sophie and Levi claim that a girl in Marseille reached out to them online, offering them an all-expenses-paid trip in exchange for returning with two suitcases.

Earlier this year the Mirror travelled to the luxury island of Koh Samui, Thailand, to expose how drug-trafficking Britons were being raked in by cannabis worth millions after drug laws were relaxed.

The lucrative smuggling network is so vast that National Crime Agency detectives and Home Office officers were deployed to Thailand for weeks to tackle the problem.

And a group of Britons were stuck with heavy luggage in their luggage while leaving the popular tourist destination of Koh Samui, where the latest Emmy Award-winning HBO show White Lotus was filmed.

The Mirror visited a farm just minutes from the luxurious Four Seasons resort where Patrick Schwarzenegger, 31, and Charlotte Le Bon, 38, filmed the hit drama.

There we found a hemp farm, made up of hundreds of plants growing row after row just metres away from a busy road.

Cared for by hand by an elderly shop employee, the flower buds had to be cut and dried before being sold to British tourists and backpackers. Inside the store, jars of products including Lemon Haze, Purple Oreo, and Blackberry were available.

Meanwhile, an industrial-sized cannabis factory next to a military post has highlighted the dangers of cannabis cultivation in Koh Samui.

On the fence, beneath the razor wire, were signs warning that the owners would use firearms on trespassers before alerting the police.

Sensible “laboratories” even offer tours of their products to curious Britons as they produce high-grade cannabis in giant quantities.

A farmer told us, “This is big business. The demand is high; we have no problem selling the product.”

In 2022, Thailand became the first country in Asia to decriminalise cannabis for medical purposes, but in practice, the market is virtually unregulated.

Neon weed signs have become ubiquitous in the busy tourist areas of Bangkok and Koh Samui, with dispensaries popping up on every corner.

Hundreds of food and beverage vendors advertise cannabis-infused menus. Private recreational use of cannabis is legal if the THC content is less than 0.2% by weight, but use of cannabis in public places is illegal.

However, regulations already exist to restrict the use of cannabis. Smoking or vaping is not allowed in public places. Causing a “public nuisance” – which includes the smell of weed – can result in a fine of 25,000 baht (£560).

Since cannabis was legalised, more than 1.1 million Thais have registered for licences to grow it, and more than 6,000 weed dispensaries have opened across the country.

The Health Ministry has reported an increase in the number of people seeking treatment for cannabis-related psychological problems.

This increases from more than 37,000 patients in 2022 to more than 63,000 in 2023. Other studies have shown that more young people are using the drug.

Source link

Solar Grants for Millions to Cut Home Energy use.

1
Solar Grants for Millions to Cut Home Energy use.
Solar energy solar

Introduction

The announcement of solar grants for millions to reduce home energy use is highly anticipated. Governments are turning to solar power as a practical solution, not only for the planet but also for people’s wallets, as energy bills remain stubbornly high and households are experiencing financial strain.

Solar energy is no longer a luxury for early adopters. Thanks to grants and incentives, it’s becoming a mainstream option for everyday households.

What Are Solar Grants and How Do They Work?

Solar grants are financial incentives, often provided by federal, state, or local governments, as well as some utility companies, that reduce or even cover the upfront cost of installing a solar panel system on your home. Unlike loans, grants typically do not need to be repaid, making them an incredibly powerful tool for making solar energy affordable for the average family.

The current federal push for clean energy has unlocked billions in funding, aiming to put solar grants for millions of American families within reach. These programmes are part of a broader strategy to boost energy independence, create jobs, and combat climate change.

Key Programs Offering Solar Grants for Millions

1. The Federal Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC)

While technically a tax credit, its impact is grant-like. The ITC allows you to deduct 30% of the cost of installing a solar energy system from your federal taxes. This significant discount applies through 2032, making it the single most valuable incentive for going solar. For a typical system costing $20,000, that’s a $6,000 direct reduction in your tax bill.

2. State & Local Grant Programs

Many states offer their own supplemental grants or rebates. These can stack with the federal ITC, driving your net cost down even further. Programs vary widely, so checking the Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency (DSIRE) is crucial.

3. Low-Income Solar and Energy Efficiency Grants

A cornerstone of the national effort is ensuring equitable access. New federal initiatives, like the Solar for All program, are allocating billions specifically to provide solar grants for millions of low- and middle-income households. These grants aim to eliminate energy burdens for families who need relief the most.

4. Non-Profit and Utility Rebates

Don’t overlook your local utility companies or non-profit organisations. Many offer direct cash rebates for installing certified solar equipment, acting as an instant discount on your project.

The Tangible Benefits: More Than Just Lower Bills

Accessing these solar grants for millions translates into real, life-changing benefits:

  • Drastic Reduction in Energy Bills: Solar panels can eliminate 50-100% of your electricity costs. Over 25+ years, this adds up to tens of thousands of dollars in savings.
  • Increased Home Value: Studies show homes with solar panels sell faster and for more money.
  • Energy Independence: Protect yourself from unpredictable utility rate hikes.
  • Environmental Impact: Significantly reduce your household’s carbon footprint by using clean, renewable energy.

How to Get Started and Claim Your Grant

  1. Research: Find all applicable solar grants for millions in your zip code.
  2. Get Quotes: Contact 3-4 reputable, certified solar installers in your area. They are experts on local incentives and will provide a detailed cost breakdown, including all applicable grants and credits.
  3. Verify Eligibility: each program has specific rules regarding income, property type, and system size. Your installer can help, but do your own due diligence.
  4. Apply: Your solar installer will typically handle much of the incentive application paperwork as part of their service.

The Future is Bright and Affordable

The landscape of home energy is changing. With historic levels of funding now available, the promise of solar grants for millions is becoming a reality. This is a unique moment to take control of your energy costs, invest in your home’s value, and contribute to a cleaner grid—all with substantial financial help.

Don’t let this opportunity shine on without you. A few hours of research today could unlock decades of energy savings and a more sustainable future for your home.

A K-pop band member sued for $30m after a record label feud.

1

Watch: ‘Trusting Time’—NewJeans discusses a court ruling in a record label dispute.

Chart-topping K-pop band NewJeans’ record label, Ador, is suing one of the band’s members in what is yet another twist in their bitter year-long feud.

Hybe, the record label’s parent company, confirmed to the BBC that it is suing Danielle Marsh, one of her family members, and ex-boss Min Hee-jin for $30m (£22m) in damages and as part of a contract break penalty.

Minji’s uncertain return has plunged the band into further turmoil, leaving them with just three members.

Coming less than two months after reports that NewJeans would return to the label as a band of five, this news dashes fans’ hopes of a comeback.

Many took to social media with the slogan “NewJeans is five or nothing”, while others questioned why Danielle was singled out.

“Does this make any sense??? NewJeans without Danielle isn’t NewJeans. Is it possible to remove a member so easily? Give us back Danielle,” one wrote in an X post.

“It’s not fair at all. Free NewJeans [all five members],” another wrote on Instagram. “All they wanted to do was to be [artists] and make their fans happy.”

NewJeans, which became the eighth biggest-selling act in the world a year after their debut in 2022, was considered a game-changer by critics for their blend of 1990s R&B and sugar-coated pop melodies.

Then came a dramatic fallout with the record label Ador in 2024, sparked by the controversial dismissal of the agency’s former CEO Min Hee-jin, whom NewJeans regarded as a mentor.

The move shook the K-pop world.

The move shook the K-pop world, setting off a battle between hugely successful and very young stars – they are between 17 and 21 years of age – and the South Korean entertainment giant, Hybe.

NewJeans accused Ador of “mistreatment” and “deliberate miscommunication and manipulation”, then announced they would leave the agency. Ador, in turn, launched a lawsuit blocking their departure, which it won in October of this year. A district court ruled that New Jeans must honour their contract with the label, which runs until 2029.

A month later, local media reports indicated that all five members would return to the agency.

Getty Images Haerin, Minji, Danielle Marsh, Hyein and Hanni Pham of NewJeans at Billboard Women In Music 2024 held at YouTube Theater on March 6, 2024 in Inglewood, CaliforniaGetty Images
NewJeans have delivered remarkable success since they debuted in July 2022

Then in a surprising turn, Ador issued a statement on Monday, saying it had terminated its contract with Danielle and would take legal action against a family member of hers and Min, who founded the label and created NewJeans before her dramatic departure.

Both of them, Ador claims, “bear significant responsibility” for the fallout between the agency and the K-pop group.

Monday’s statement did not mention a lawsuit against Danielle, saying only that Ador had decided it was difficult to continue working with her and told her they would be ending the contract.

Ador asserted that “persistently distorted and biassed information” had exposed NewJeans’ members, resulting in “significant misunderstandings” about the label.

That statement named two other NewJeans members: Hanni, who it said decided to remain with the label after “extended conversations” which included her family, and Minji, who is still in “ongoing conversations” with the agency.

It’s been a whirlwind for fans, especially since Ador initially announced in November that only two members, Hyein and Haerin, would return to the agency, sparking fears the group would split up.

These fears were allayed when Hanni, Danielle and Minji said in a separate statement hours later that they too would return – but only for a short time, as it turns out.

Getty Images Danielle Marsh, a member of NewJeansGetty Images
Ador announced Monday that it would terminate its contract with NewJeans member Danielle Marsh.

“NewJeans is a significant group that changed the world of female K-pop acts. For the music listeners and fans, it has been the hope to see their return as a full five-member team. That’s no longer possible,” music critic Lim Hee-yun told the BBC, adding that this outcome would not “make anyone happy”.

Mr Lim believes Ador would be pressured to recruit new members into the group, especially if Minji also leaves the label.

It is hard for three-member groups to find success in the K-pop industry, where fans pay close attention to the relationships and chemistry between members.

Danielle’s future as a musician is also uncertain.

“Not only will there be a large part of the public that sees her negatively [because of this controversy], but the record labels will too… She might need to pursue being a solo act as an actor, model, or influencer,” Mr Lim said.

Source link

What’s happening with gas and electricity prices?

1
Getty Images A woman wearing rolled-up blue jeans and white and purple knitted socks rests her feet on a white radiator. Getty Images

Typical household energy costs will increase slightly on Thursday when the new energy price cap takes effect.

Separately, the regulator Ofgem has said customer bills will rise by around £30 a year over the next six years to help fund a major investment in the UK’s energy network.

However, that announcement followed an earlier government pledge in the budget to remove some other costs from annual energy bills, worth about £150 to a typical household.

What is the energy cap and how is it changing?

The energy cap covers around 19 million households in England, Wales, and Scotland, and it is set by Ofgem every three months.

It fixes the maximum amount customers can be charged for each unit of gas and electricity on a standard – or default – variable tariff for a typical dual-fuel household that pays by direct debit.

Actual bills depend on the amount of energy used.

A bar chart showing the energy price cap for a typical household on a price-capped, dual-fuel tariff paying by direct debit, from January 2022 to January 2026. The figure was £1,216 based on typical usage in January 2022. This rose to a high of £4,059 in January 2023, although the Energy Price Guarantee limited bills to £2,380 for a typical household between October 2022 and June 2023. Bills dropped £1,568 in July 2024, before rising slightly to £1,717 in October, £1,738 in January 2025, £1,849 a year from April, £1,720 from July, and £1,755 from October. From January 2026, the figure will be £1,758.

What is a typical household?

The price cap sets the unit prices for gas and electricity, but your household’s actual bill depends on the overall amount you use and how you pay for it.

The type of property you live in, how energy efficient it is, how many people live there and the weather all make a difference.

Infographic titled “The amount you actually pay depends on the amount of energy you use – How might your bill work out?” It shows three household categories with estimated annual energy costs based on usage: Low (a flat or one-bedroom house using 7,500 kWh of gas and 1,800 kWh of electricity) will pay about  £1,271 a year; medium (a two to three-bedroom house using 11,500 kWh of gas and 2,700 kWh of electricity) will pay about £1,758 a year; large (a four+ bedroom house using 17,000 kWh of gas and 4,100 kWh of electricity) will pay about £2,471 a year. A note explains these are illustrative with costs based on energy price cap rates for 1 Jan to 31 Mar 2026 for dual fuel customers paying by direct debit. Source: BBC analysis of Ofgem figures.

The Ofgem cap is based on a “typical household” using 11,500 kWh of gas and 2,700 kWh of electricity a year with a single bill for gas and electricity, settled by direct debit.

The vast majority of people pay their bill this way to help spread payments across the year. Those who pay every three months in cash or a check are charged more.

Why has Ofgem said energy bills will rise?

In December, Ofgem said it had approved a £28bn investment to improve the electricity and gas grids in Great Britain.

It says this will strengthen the energy supply and better shield customers from volatile energy prices. It will also reduce Britain’s dependence on gas.

Customers will foot part of the cost, through an additional £108 added to energy bills by 2031. Bills will start to rise from April 2026.

However, Ofgem says the investment will make wholesale energy cheaper overall, saving households about £80 a year, leading to a net energy bill rise of about £30 a year.

What did the government say about energy costs in the budget?

In the November Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced measures to cut energy costs from April 2026.

At the moment, energy bills in England, Scotland and Wales already include additional charges to help fund insulation for low-income households and subsidies for green energy projects such as wind farms and solar panels.

Reeves said the insulation scheme – called the Energy Company Obligation – would be scrapped, and for three years, renewable energy projects will be 75% funded by general taxation instead of a levy on energy bills.

She said this would take £150 off average annual dual-fuel bills.

After taking into account the increase as a result of the Ofgem announcement, it means average energy bills should fall by about £120 a year.

Should I take a meter reading when the energy cap changes?

Submitting a meter reading when the cap changes means you are not charged for estimated usage at the wrong rate.

This is especially important when prices go up.

Customers with working smart meters do not need to submit a reading, as their bill is calculated automatically.

What is happening to prepayment customers?

About six million households have prepayment meters, according to the latest Ofgem figures.

Prepayment customers were previously charged more than those who settle their bill by direct debit but now pay slightly less.

Between 1 January and 31 March 2026, the typical annual bill for prepayment customers is £1,711.

Getty Images Hand on a key being inserted into a prepayment meter with a display showing £7.87 left in credit.Getty Images

Many prepayment meters have been in place for years, but some were installed more recently after customers struggled to pay higher bills.

Rules introduced in November 2023 mean suppliers must give customers more opportunity to clear their debts before switching them to a meter. They cannot be installed at all in certain households.

Can I fix my energy prices?

Fixed-price deals are not affected by the energy price cap, which changes every three months and can rise and fall.

They offer certainty for a set period – often a year or longer – but if energy prices drop while you are on the deal, you could be stuck at a higher price. You may also have to pay a penalty to leave a fixed deal early if you change your mind.

Ofgem, the energy regulator, says customers who want the security of knowing what their bill will be should consider moving to a fixed deal. However, it says they should make sure they understand all the costs.

Martin Lewis, founder of Money Saving Expert, recommends checking whole-of-market energy price comparison sites to help find the best deal.

What are standing charges and how are they changing?

Ofgem also controls standing charges, which are a fixed daily fee to cover the costs of connecting households to gas and electricity supplies. These vary slightly by region.

Between 1 January and 31 March 2026, standing charges will typically be 55.75p a day for electricity and 35.09p a day for gas.

Campaigners have long argued that standing charges are unfair because they make up a bigger proportion of the bill of low energy users.

In response, Ofgem said that by the end of January 2026, it wants all energy firms to offer at least one tariff that has a low standing charge but a higher cost per unit of energy.

The regulator said this would give some customers more choice and control but acknowledged it would not be suitable for everyone.

Charities, campaigners and the suppliers’ trade body criticised the proposal for just shifting the cost from one part of the bill to another rather than cutting it.

What help can I get with energy bills?

Suppliers must offer customers affordable payment plans or repayment holidays if necessary. Most also offer hardship grants.

Under plans Ofgem hopes to introduce in early 2026, nearly 200,000 people on benefits could have their debts to their energy supplier canceled—as long as they have made some effort to pay what is owed.

The scheme could see up to £500m knocked off the £4.4bn currently owed to suppliers. But covering the cost will require an extra £5 being added to everyone’s gas and electricity bill.

A number of existing government schemes also help people on low incomes with their energy bills.

The Household Support Fund, which was introduced in September 2021 to help vulnerable customers, has been extended until March 2026.

The Warm Home Discount scheme is also being overhauled.

From winter 2025, anyone on means-tested benefits in Great Britain will get £150 taken off their bills, no matter what size of property they live in.

The discount will be applied automatically for people in England or Wales and some in Scotland. However, those on a low income in Scotland will need to apply via their energy supplier. Letters are being sent to people with information on the discount.

The Fuel Direct Scheme lets people repay an energy debt directly from their benefit payments.

About nine million pensioners will also get the Winter Fuel Payment in 2025/2026, worth £200 or £300, after a government U-turn over eligibility.



Source link

Bayeux Tapestry: Priceless artefact to be insured for £800m | UK News

1

Introduction to the Bayeux Tapestry

The news that the Bayeux Tapestry, a priceless artefact, is to be insured for £800m has grabbed attention around the world—and for good reason. We’re not just talking about a historic artwork. We’re talking about a near-1,000-year-old visual record of one of the most decisive moments in British and European history.

So why does a long strip of embroidered cloth command such an eye-watering insurance figure? And what does this mean for its future?

Let’s examine the story in detail.


What is the Bayeux Tapestry?

Despite its name, the Bayeux Tapestry isn’t actually a tapestry. It’s an embroidered linen cloth stretching nearly 70 meters long, depicting the events leading up to the Norman Conquest of England in 1066.

It tells the story visually, almost like a mediaeval comic strip—except this one ends with the Battle of Hastings and the rise of William the Conqueror.


Why it still matters today

The Bayeux Tapestry is one of the earliest and most detailed historical narratives ever created. It bridges art, history, and storytelling in a way only a few artefacts can.

Think of it as the mediaeval version of a documentary series—stitched by hand.

The tapestry displayed behind a bespoke glass case in Normandy. Pic: AP
I

A Brief History of the Bayeux Tapestry

Origins in the 11th century

Most historians posit that the creation of the tapestry occurred in the late 11th century, shortly after the Norman Conquest. Its survival alone is remarkable, considering wars, revolutions, and centuries of political upheaval.


Who commissioned the tapestry?

Many experts point to Bishop Odo of Bayeux, William the Conqueror’s half-brother, as the likely commissioner. The scenes subtly favour the Norman perspective—hardly a coincidence.


The story of the Norman Conquest

From Harold Godwinson’s rise to power to his dramatic death on the battlefield, the tapestry captures politics, betrayal, ambition, and warfare with astonishing clarity.

No textbooks. No footnotes. The images speak for themselves.


Why the Bayeux Tapestry Is So Valuable

Cultural and historical significance

The Bayeux Tapestry stands as a unique historical document. There is nothing else like it anywhere in the world.

It is referenced by historians, studied by students, and admired by millions of visitors each year.

 

Technicians in France digitalised the tapestry in 2020. Pic: AP

Artistic craftsmanship and materials

Hand-embroidered using wool thread on linen, the level of detail is extraordinary. Horses, ships, armour, and facial expressions are all present.

Each stitch is a fingerprint from the past.


Why it cannot be replaced

If the Bayeux Tapestry were lost or destroyed, it would be gone forever. There’s no second version. There is no backup copy of the original.

That irreplaceability is a major reason behind the £800m insurance figure.


Bayeux Tapestry to Be Insured for £800m

What does the £800m insurance valuation mean?

When headlines say “Bayeux Tapestry: priceless artefact to be insured for £800m”, it’s not about selling it. Insurance valuations reflect the cost of loss, damage, and cultural impact—not market price.

In short: it’s about protection, not profit.


Why now?

The increased valuation reflects rising awareness of heritage risks, from climate change to geopolitical instability. It also aligns with modern museum standards for insuring world-class artefacts.


Insurance vs market value

To be clear: the Bayeux Tapestry is not for sale. Ever.

Insurance simply assigns a financial figure to something that is, in reality, beyond price.


Risks Facing the Bayeux Tapestry

Age and material fragility

Nearly a millennium old, the tapestry is vulnerable to light, humidity, and physical stress. Even minor environmental changes can cause long-term damage.


Fire, theft, and accidental damage

While security is extremely tight, no artefact is completely risk-free. Insurance ensures that, should the unthinkable happen, conservation and recovery efforts can be funded immediately.


Climate and environmental threats

Rising temperatures and humidity fluctuations are a growing concern for all historic textiles, including the Bayeux Tapestry.


How Artefacts Like the Bayeux Tapestry Are Insured

Specialist heritage insurance

Only a handful of insurers worldwide handle objects of this significance. Policies are custom-built, covering everything from storage to display.


Risk assessments and security

Insurance providers require rigorous risk assessments, including fire suppression systems, surveillance, and restricted access.


Transport and exhibition coverage

If the tapestry ever travels, insurance costs spike dramatically. Movement is one of the riskiest moments for any artefact.


Potential Return of the Bayeux Tapestry to the UK

Historical links to Britain

The tapestry tells England’s story as much as France’s. For years, there have been discussions about a temporary UK exhibition.


Political and cultural discussions

Any move would require delicate diplomacy. France considers the tapestry a national treasure—and understandably so.


Public reaction in France and the UK

Public interest is intense on both sides of the Channel, with many seeing a shared ownership of history.


Conservation and Preservation Efforts

Modern conservation techniques

Today, conservators use cutting-edge technology to monitor fibres, colours, and stitching in microscopic detail.


Digital preservation projects

High-resolution digital scans now allow researchers to study the tapestry without handling it.


Limiting public exposure

Ironically, popularity can be dangerous. Strict visitor limits help reduce long-term damage.


Where Images Should Be Added

Suggested image placements

  • After the introduction: a full-length image of the Bayeux Tapestry

  • In the history section: close-ups of key scenes like the Battle of Hastings

  • In the conservation section: behind-the-scenes images of preservation work

Captions and SEO value

Each image should include descriptive captions using the focus keyword “Bayeux Tapestry” to boost SEO and accessibility.


Why the £800m Figure Has Captured Global Attention

Media and public response

The headline figure is shocking—but it also highlights how seriously cultural heritage is now taken.


What it says about heritage protection

This valuation sends a clear message: history matters, and protecting it is worth the investment.


Bayeux Tapestry in Popular Culture

Education and documentaries

The tapestry features heavily in school curricula, museums, and historical documentaries worldwide.


Influence on modern storytelling

From films to graphic novels, its visual storytelling continues to inspire creators today.


The Future of the Bayeux Tapestry

Long-term protection plans

With enhanced insurance, improved conservation, and digital backups, the tapestry’s future looks more secure than ever.


Passing history to future generations

The ultimate goal is simple: ensure that people 500 years from now can still stand in awe of the Bayeux Tapestry.


Conclusion

The decision that places the Bayeux Tapestry, a priceless artefact, to be insured for £800m, is about far more than money. It’s about recognising the immense value of shared human history and taking responsibility for its protection.

This ancient embroidered cloth isn’t just a relic—it’s a storyteller, a witness, and a bridge between centuries. And now, it’s guarded like never before.


FAQs

1. Why is the Bayeux Tapestry insured for £800m?
Because it is irreplaceable and culturally priceless, with insurance covering potential loss or damage.

2. Is the Bayeux Tapestry for sale?
No. It is a protected historical artefact and will never be sold.

3. Where is the Bayeux Tapestry kept now?
It is housed in Bayeux, France, under strict conservation conditions.

4. Could the Bayeux Tapestry ever come to the UK?
Possibly on loan, though no final agreement has been confirmed.

5. How old is the Bayeux Tapestry?
It dates back to the late 11th century, making it nearly 1,000 years old.



Source link

It’s been a shocking two days of Trump diplomacy – but how much was dramatic hot air? , world News

1

Two December days at Palm Beach and I’m sunburnt and bruised.

The sunburn is my fault. But Donald Trump is the one to blame for the fighting; such is his style of diplomacy. He would have no other option. He’s busy making things happen. That’s how he frames it.

But let’s take stock because there’s still a lot to process. Could you please clarify what has been achieved over the past two days, how significant the heatwave was, and if there were any unexpected developments?

Let’s start with the Middle East and the Israeli Prime Minister’s visit, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Mr Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu speak outside Mar-a-Lago
image:
Mr Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu speak outside Mar-a-Lago

“An excellent meeting.” This is how Netanyahu’s spokesman described the day it all came to an end.

You can see why he might think that. Netanyahu got what he came for.

• Should US intelligence conclude, as Israeli spies do, that Iran is indeed regrouping, would Trump’s commitment to bomb Iran again be justified? tick.

• Trump held Hamas fully responsible for the faltering Gaza ceasefire, and he also aimed to prevent phase two from proceeding. tick.

• Will Trump praise Netanyahu as Israel’s defender and wartime leader like no one else? The answer is a resounding “yes” for the election campaign video.

Will Trump publicly say that Netanyahu should be pardoned?

• Will Trump publicly say that Netanyahu should be pardoned in his corruption case and put pressure on the President of Israel to immediately enact amnesty? tick.

There’s a lot to process there.

Trump says that he maintains complete control over Iran. Trump threatened to “destroy” Hamas. How will all these events happen in 2026? If he follows through (a big if), how will his base react domestically? There is a lot to consider.

 

The moment Trump issued a new threat to Iran

Netanyahu and Trump had some intriguing differences of opinion, one on Syria and the other on the West Bank.

In Syria, Trump said that he wants to bring sweetness to relations between the two countries. He expressed his desire to improve the relationship between the new Syrian president and Israel. Good luck to him if he can. His victory would be an achievement and would be welcome.

On the West Bank, Trump suggested he was concerned about settler violence and expansion. This is a big issue; it jeopardises Trump’s vision for the region. Again – if it can stop the violence and expansion, it will be an achievement.

I’m not holding my breath.

 

However, as always, there was more information than we anticipated; we did not expect such details to emerge from two independent news conferences where the US President did most of the talking.

He was asked about the attack on Venezuela, which he had casually and vaguely mentioned in an earlier interview.

He confirmed that yes, he had ordered an attack on a “major facility” in Venezuela. That’s the big news – the first American ground attack. However, this was just one moment in a series of diplomatic events that took place at Mar-a-Lago.

This was followed by his response, which appears to be a significant Chinese military dress rehearsal for a blockade of Taiwan.

Was Trump worried? ‘No,’ he said. “I’m not worried.”

Just chill? Or don’t really care? Sometimes it’s hard to know.

This event happened just a day ago with the President of Ukraine at Mar-a-Lago.

Mr. Zelensky met with Mr. Trump. Photo: Office of the President of Ukraine/Photo-Alliance/dpa/AP Images
image:
Mr Zelensky met with Mr Trump. Photo: Office of the President of Ukraine/Photo-Alliance/dpa/AP Images

Is this irony or just madness that Volodymyr Zelensky, coming from a city of real palaces, including his own presidential palace, travelled to Palm Beach—a city often referred to as Disneyland—where he sought support from a former real estate tycoon in his fake palace for the future of his country?

Even though everything appeared to be proceeding smoothly, there was a sense of unease.

 


Is the Ukraine ceasefire ever closer?

Ukrainian officials told me that they are very pleased with Trump’s stated commitment to security guarantees. They ignored the important issue of how long these guarantees last or whether they can trust Trump’s words. What option do they have?

Of course, there was more. President Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin twice, before and after the Zelenskyy meeting. And what he said after the second call piqued the interest.

He announced that Putin told him Ukraine had attacked one of his houses with a swarm of drones.

Zelensky had previously called this claim false, suggesting that if Ukraine did attack, it would be a false flag operation intended to derail the peace process, as Putin does not want peace.

But based on Trump’s tone, it seemed that he was agreeing with Putin. Remember, in his first term, Trump gave more importance to Putin’s words than what his intelligence agencies said.

Thus, the past two days have been filled with mind-boggling news, providing a fitting conclusion to the year.

2026 is an election year for Donald Trump. Midterms are in November. He needs to focus on the “home front,”, as his vice president subtly reminded him a few months ago. The focus should be on the economy and the cost of living, not on foreign conflicts.

Trump knows this. But so do America’s adversaries and its troublesome allies. What risks might they consider in 2026, understanding that they may not be concerned or will simply proceed with their plans?

Buckle up.



Source link

Key Occurrences of Day 1,405 of the Russia-Ukraine War | Russia-Ukraine War News

1

These are the key developments on the 1,405th day of Russia’s war on Ukraine.

Click here to share this article on social media.

Here’s what happened on Tuesday, December 30:

Allegation of attack on Putin’s residence

  • The attack on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s residence in Novgorod, northwestern Russia, came on Sunday “practically immediately after” talks in Florida between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov said.
  • The strike “will not go unanswered,” Ushakov said in comments reported by Russian media, following a call between Trump and Putin.
  • Sergei Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister, reported that Russian air defence systems shot down 91 long-range drones used in the attack, resulting in no injuries.
  • Zelenskyy denied the claim and accused Russia of trying to derail peace talks.
  • However, Trump expressed anger over the alleged attack, telling reporters, “I was furious about it.” Asked whether the United States had evidence of an attack, Trump said, “We’ll find out.”
  • Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that “the response to Kiev’s attacks will not be diplomatic” and that Russia would revise its negotiating positions in the wake of the attack.
  • The UAE Foreign Ministry said in a statement that it “strongly condemns” the “reprehensible attack” and the “threat to security and stability”.

Diplomacy

  • White House spokeswoman Carolyn Leavitt said a phone call between Putin and Trump about Ukraine on Monday was “positive”, without elaborating.
  • Zelensky said he spoke by phone with the leaders of Germany, Latvia and Finland and briefed them on the results of his meeting with Trump and the peace talks.
  • Lavrov said in an interview with the Russian news agency RIA Novosti that “Kyiv and its Western supporters must recognise the new regional realities that have emerged after the annexation of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Donetsk People’s Republic, the Luhansk People’s Republic, and the Zaporizhia and Kherson regions of the Russian Federation.” He was referring to Russian-held Ukrainian territories that Moscow claims to have captured, including Donetsk and Luhansk, which Russian-backed separatists named DPR and LPR.
  • A poll published on Monday by the Ilko Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation (DIF), a Ukrainian think tank, showed that recognising the occupied Ukrainian territories as “part of the Russian Federation” remained extremely unpopular in Ukraine, with 76 percent of Ukrainians saying they considered it “unacceptable.”

fighting

  • Russian forces attacked the front-line town of Orikhiv in Ukraine’s Zaporizhia region, killing a 46-year-old man and wounding a 49-year-old woman, Governor Ivan Fedorov said on Telegram.
  • Russian military strikes on Ukraine’s Donetsk region on Sunday resulted in one person’s death and five injuries, according to Governor Vadim Fylashkin’s Facebook post.
  • Ukraine’s human rights commissioner, Dmytro Lubinets, said on Telegram that Russian forces killed seven civilians who were hiding in a basement in the Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk.
  • Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office said it has opened an investigation into reports that Russian troops shot dead two captured Ukrainian soldiers in the village of Shakhov, Pokrovsky, on Saturday.
  • “The deliberate killing of prisoners of war is a gross violation of the Geneva Conventions and a serious international crime,” the Prosecutor General’s Office said.
  • Russia’s TASS state news agency quoted local officials as saying that Ukrainian strikes wounded five civilians in Russia’s Belgorod region.
  • The Ukrainian attacks wounded four civilians in the Russian-occupied Ukrainian region of Zaporizhia and three in the Russian-occupied Ukrainian region of Donetsk, TASS reported, citing local officials.
  • In a televised address from the Kremlin, Putin made various claims about Moscow’s ongoing war on Ukraine, including that Russian troops were advancing toward the Ukrainian city of Zaporizhia.
  • The Russian army chief of staff, Gen. Valery Gerasimov, said during the same address that Russian forces had captured 6,460 square kilometres (2,494 square miles) of territory in Ukraine in 2025, including 334 villages.
  • The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) quoted its Director General Rafael Grossi as saying that repairs to a power line near Ukraine’s Zaporizhia nuclear plant have been successfully completed.

Source link