Home Blog Page 77

The government has canceled plans to make digital ID mandatory to work in the UK

1

The government has scrapped a plan to require workers to sign up to a new digital ID system to prove their right to work in the UK.

Instead, Labour ministers say existing checks will go completely online by 2029, using documents such as biometric passports.

The reversal is the latest in a series of U-turns in recent weeks, including on inheritance tax for agricultural land and business rates for pubs.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said it showed Sir Keir Starmer was “clueless” and showing “no sense of direction”.

Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions, the Tory leader welcomed the government’s collapse, labelling the initial digital ID plan a “nonsense policy.”

However, he asserted that the shift in strategy demonstrated Sir Keir’s unsteadiness, forecasting that Labour would soon reverse its contentious plans. reduce jury trials.

The prime minister hit back, pointing to policy reversals and ministerial churn under the previous government, and accused the Conservatives of “collapsing the economy” during their time in office.

He said, “I will make it harder for people to work illegally in this country, so there will be mandatory digital checks.”

When the government first announced the policy plan,

It argued that mandatory digital IDs for workers would make it easier to crack down on immigrants working illegally.

It is understood that the plan will now deal less narrowly with immigration and the government will instead place more emphasis on the argument that digital IDs can be a useful tool for the public when accessing public services.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told BBC Radio 4’s Today program that the government was still “fully committed” to mandatory digital right-to-work checks, including biometric passports, and said digitalising the system would help crack down on illegal work.

“Digital ID can be a way that you can prove your eligibility to work through a digital right to work check,” he said.

“At the moment we have a paper-based system – there are no proper records maintained.

“This makes it very difficult to sensibly target enforcement action against businesses that employ illegal workers.”

Former Home Secretary Lord David Blunkett, who supported ID cards while in government, said in the same program that the government had not explained why the policy mattered or how it would work, so it was “not surprising” to see another U-turn.

“There was no narrative or supporting statement or any kind of strategic planning after the original statement, including other ministers and people who are really committed to making this case,” he said.

“As a result, people who were opposed to the plan for all sorts of nefarious and very different reasons, some of which were vague, were able to mobilise public opinion and protest it online.”

Polling showed that public support for digital ID dropped after Sir Keir’s announcement, falling from half the population’s support just after his speech in June to less than a third.

Nearly three million people have signed a parliamentary petition opposing the introduction of digital IDs.

There is also trepidation among some Labour MPs over the mandatory aspect of the original proposal.

Whatever they think of this specific policy change, Labour MPs are growing increasingly frustrated with the government’s U-turn.

Some were already wary of defending controversial government policies in front of their voters because they feared the policy would inevitably be overturned.

A furious Labour MP told the BBC last night that the latest U-turn was “an absolute car crash”, adding, “The boys in Number 10 jumped into it without a second thought; they drove the PLP over the hill and bottled it up, took all the pain on themselves and took no credit.”

The Liberal Democrats said the policy was “doomed to failure” from the start and called for the “billions of pounds earmarked for their mandatory digital ID scheme” to be spent “on the NHS and frontline policing”.

The party’s Cabinet Office spokeswoman, Lisa Smart, said, “No 10 should be ordering motion sickness tablets in bulk at this rate to deal with all their U-turns.”

Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, said in a post on Twitter: “This is a victory for individual freedoms against a terrible, authoritarian government. Reform UK will absolutely destroy this.”

Green Party leader Zac Polanski welcomed the news on Twitter, saying, “The government has done a U-turn on ID cards. Good.”

A government spokesperson said, “We are committed to investigating the essential digital right to work.

“Right to work checks currently involve a hodgepodge of paper-based systems with no record of a check ever taking place. This is open to fraud and abuse.

“Digital ID will make everyday life easier for people, ensuring that public services are more personalised, joined up and effective, as well as inclusive.”

Employers must check in advance whether the person they want to hire has the right to work in the UK.

From 2022, employers will be able to verify passport-holding British and Irish citizens using government-certified digital verification services.

There is also a Home Office online scheme which verifies the status of certain non-British or Irish citizens whose immigration status is kept electronically.

Details of how the digital ID will work have not yet been determined, but it is expected to be based on two government-built systems: Gov.uk One Login and Gov.uk Wallet.

More than 12 million people are currently signed up to One Login, which can be used for services like applying for a veteran’s card, cancelling a lost passport or managing a lasting power of attorney.

The Gov.uk Wallet has not yet launched, but it will allow people to store their digital ID on their smartphones.

The digital ID will include name, date of birth, nationality, state of residence and a photo.

Source link

Appeal to ‘close all windows’ after huge factory fire in Wolverhampton

1

Fire broke out in the factory building on Wednesday morning

More than 100 firefighters are tackling a massive blaze at the factory and nearby residents and workers have been warned to close their windows and doors amid concerns about air quality.

A fire broke out in a building near the junction of Sunbeam Street with Upper Villiers Street in Blakenhall, Wolverhampton, shortly after 07:30 GMT on Wednesday.

West Midlands Fire Service said the fire was causing significant disruption and could affect air quality in the area. People have been urged to avoid the area and crews are expected to remain at the scene overnight.

The fire service said 21 fire engines were at the scene by about 12:30 GMT, as thick black smoke billowed from the fire.

Ash was falling on cars and houses below, with a strong smell of smoke in the area.

Neighbours informed the BBC that they assumed the building served as a commercial space.

West Midlands Fire Service The large fire has been contained from above. A large plume of smoke and flames can be seen coming out of a building. Smoke fills the picture.West Midlands Fire Service
West Midlands Fire Service dispatched over 100 firefighters to combat the fire, cautioning the nearby residents about the potential danger of the smoke.

Crowds have gathered at Moore Street South and Lower Villiers Street, with police cordoning off Upper Villiers Street at both locations.

Authorities closed Upper Villiers Street and other nearby streets to pedestrians and cars and directed traffic to other streets.

The fire department described the fire as “significant,” saying the factory measured approximately 100 meters by 50 meters.

a big red cart with
The ash emanating from the smoke plume was falling on houses and vehicles in the area.

A spokesperson said, “While we work at the scene, we are expecting significant disruption in and around this site for the rest of today, this evening and overnight, so please plan any travel and adjust accordingly.”

Smoke from the fire could be seen across the town and a listener to BBC Radio WM reported that he could smell and taste the smoke while standing in the Mander Center car park, about a mile (1.6 km) from the fire.

“There is smoke billowing across Wolverhampton city centre; you can smell and taste it in the air,” said Steve, from Bushbury.

“There has actually been a huge fire burning since 07:30 this morning.”

People are standing near a fire on the road and a plume of black smoke is billowing into the sky over a row of neighboring shops. A fire engine can be seen parked near some shops on the road.
According to witnesses, the smoke was visible more than a mile away.

A West Midlands Ambulance Service spokesperson said it was called to the fire just before 08:00 and their Hazardous Area Response Team was dispatched to the fire before withdrawing.

He said that there is no news of anyone being injured.

West Midlands Fire Service A firefighter standing on a platform fires a jet at the blaze below as flames erupt from the building. The flames are on the side of the building and there are large objects on the other side of the wall. There is no roof on the building. Burnt debris can be seen.West Midlands Fire Service
The fire service said crews would remain at the scene overnight

Reiterating its warning for people to stay away from the area, the fire service said it had increased its presence at the scene at around 11:00 GMT due to the severity of the fire.

A spokesperson said, “As a result, we want to remind everyone to stay away from the area at this time. If you live or work in the area, please keep your windows and doors closed.”

Smoke can be seen rising into the sky in the distance. The photo was taken in a large brown/muddy field.
The fire was visible for several miles across the West Midlands, including at County John Lane, between Stourbridge and Hagley, about 15 miles away.

Source link

The High Court hears the prosecutors’ challenge to dismiss the kneecap terror charge. ants and art news.

1

Kneecap supporters gathered outside the High Court on Wednesday as judges heard the appeal from the Crown Prosecution Service to dismiss a terrorism case against a member of a rap trio.

Liam Og O Hunnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was charged in May 2025 with the alleged display of a flag in support of the banned terrorist group. Hezbollah was the subject of a programme in London in November 2024.

But the case against the 28-year-old Belfast-born rapper was dismissed in September on a technical basis.

Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring then told Woolwich Crown Court that the charge was “unlawful” and he had no jurisdiction to hear the case – but prosecutors appealed against the decision.

Kneecap's JJ O'Dochartaigh (DJ Prowai) attended the High Court hearing in support of his bandmate. Photo: PA
image:
Kneecap’s JJ O’Dochartaigh (DJ Prowai) attended the High Court hearing in support of his bandmate. Photo: PA

Kneecap’s JJ O’Dochartaigh, whose stage name is DJ Prowai, and manager Daniel Lambert attended the High Court of Appeal in London on Wednesday, greeted by supporters and protesters gathered outside, as they had done at a previous hearing.

After spending a full day in court,

Hearing evidence from both sides, Lord Justice Addis and Mr Justice Linden said they would give their judgement at a later date.

Why was the original case dismissed?

Liam Og Ó Hannaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara outside Woolwich Crown Court in September. Photo: PA
image:
Liam Og Ó Hannaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, outside Woolwich Crown Court in September. Photo: PA

After Ó Hannaidh was charged, he appeared in court for the first time in June. At a second hearing in August, the rapper’s lawyers argued that prosecutors should have sought permission from the Attorney General, the Crown’s chief legal adviser, to charge the rapper with a terrorist offence before being informed of the decision on May 21 last year.

The court was told that permission was instead granted the following day, meaning it fell outside the six-month time limit in which criminal charges can be brought against a defendant for this type of offence. The event in question took place on November 21, 2024.

After hearing evidence, the Chief Magistrate agreed with O’Hannaid’s lawyers and found that the proceedings had been “unlawfully instituted.”.

Then, the CPS announced its appeal. A spokesperson stated that the organisation “believes there is an important point of law that needs to be clarified.”

At the High Court on Wednesday, Paul Jarvis Casey, for the CPS, said the Attorney General’s permission was in place before O’Hannaidh’s first court appearance on 18 June, which meant the necessary requirements had been met.

Kneecap's Mo Chara and Moglai Bap on stage at Glastonbury. Photo: PA
image:
Kneecap’s Mo Chara and Moglai Bap on stage at Glastonbury. Photo: PA

In court, he said the chief magistrate “erred in his interpretation of the law” when he dismissed the terrorism case, adding, “These proceedings are and will remain valid in law.”

However, Jude Bunting KC, representing O Hunnaidh, said the findings made by the chief magistrate in September were “certainly correct.”.

In his own written submission, he said the reply was “simply… the necessary permissions and consents were not provided at the time of commencement of the proceedings.”

Mr. Bunting said CPS’s appeal “contradicts the principle that the law should be consistent.”

Kneecap had earlier said in a post on social media that the decision was “once again… a huge waste of taxpayers’ money, police time, [and] court time.”.

The band's lawyer Darragh Mackin (left), and manager Daniel Lambert (right), with DJ Provi outside the High Court. Photo: PA
image:
The band’s lawyer, Darragh Mackin (left), and manager, Daniel Lambert (right), with DJ Provi outside the High Court. Photo: PA

Who are the kneecaps?

Kneecap released their debut single in 2017 and gained widespread fame following the release of their debut album and a semi-biographical film in 2024.

In 2024, the band wins a discrimination case against UK government Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who tried to deny her a £14,250 funding award while she was in government as Business Secretary.

Ahead of the High Court hearing, Belfast MPs addressed those showing support for the band outside.

North Belfast MP John Finucane said, “We will stand with Liam.” “We are committed to standing on the correct side of history.”

“We are before the court today because the British government refused to accept a previous judge’s decision to end this case,” said Paul Maskey, MP for Belfast West.

The judges said they had been given a lot to think about and a decision would be made later.

Source link

Iranian clothing store owner’s family faces final humiliation at age 26

0

The world has expressed outrage at the planned execution of Iranian shop owner Irfan Sultani, 26, who was given just 10 minutes to bid farewell to his heartbroken family.

Irfan Soltani, 26, will be one of the first to die by hanging on Wednesday

Irfan Soltani, 26, will be one of the first to die by hanging on Wednesday. (Image:

Irfan Sultani, 26, faced execution after being arrested during a wave of anti-government protests and immediately sentenced to death by an Iranian court.

Irfan, a resident of Fardis near Tehran, was detained on January 8 during protests that have gripped Iran since late December 2025. He was charged with moharebeh—”waging war against God,” a capital crime under Iranian law that is often applied against perceived threats to the state.

His family reportedly waited for several days to learn what had happened to him, only to be informed that he had been sentenced to death and would only be allowed a 10-minute goodbye. Human rights groups have raised concerns over the speed of the process and the practice has been widely condemned by human rights organisations due to the lack of due process.

read more : ‘President Trump, please don’t let Iran execute our Irfan – we need help now.’ Read more: Father’s heartbreaking last request to son, hours before his body was found in water.

Irfan Soltani

Irrfan has only been allowed to talk to the family for a short while (Image: Facebook)

Reports indicate that Irfan was refused legal advice, and his licensed attorney was prevented from accessing his case file. His death date was set today, January 14, and as the countdown draws closer, the psychological impact on Irrfan and his loved ones will be immeasurable.

And criminal psychologist Alex Issat told the Mirror that prosecutors design the system to cause maximum harm and terror to those arrested and their loved ones.

Alex says, “To be told that you will be killed in a matter of hours while following a sham legal process creates a psychological double blow.” “The brain doesn’t have time to adjust from the initial shock of the arrest to the reality of being told you’re going to die, and this contingency can force it into extreme survival mode, oscillating between intense hyper-anxiety and profound dissociation.”

Ms Iszt explains that in such moments, victims may oscillate between fear of pain and the unknown and emotional numbness, where the mind dissociates as a protective mechanism against the overwhelming terror. This type of sudden psychological shock leaves no room for gradual emotional processing.

The cruelty of enacting very short farewells – often monitored and scripted – makes this trauma all the more acute for Irrfan and his family. “The specific brutality of the farewell call compounds this trauma; the calls are short and monitored and deprive both him and his family of any real or authentic final moments or truth,” says Alex, highlighting the impossible emotional balancing act of those final minutes.

Rather than offering closure, the last monitored conversation often becomes a frozen image—a final memory of forced stillness or visible distress that family members continually replay in their minds. And the suddenness of the announcement and lack of control over almost every aspect of the matter have become further sources of anguish.

Alex explains, “For the family, contingency is also a psychological weapon, a power play by the state.” “This reinforces their complete lack of control and also indicates that the same fate could befall others.”

Izzet says, “This behaviour is a recognised tool of political terror, designed not only to break down the individual’s sense of self but also to project power outward.” “The psychological suffering inflicted forms a central part of punishment rather than an unintended consequence.”

Throughout Iran and around the world, there is intense outrage over Irfan’s impending execution. Rights organisations call his conviction a clear example of how the state is weaponising its justice system to suppress dissent amid a growing crackdown.

US President Donald Trump has warned Iran that the US will take “forceful action” if it executes protesters. The unrest that began more than two weeks ago when shoppers took to the streets of Tehran has escalated, with a human rights group estimating that more than 2,400 protesters have been killed in the government crackdown.

Originally, the demonstrations began on December 28 over a sharp decline in the value of the Iranian currency but turned into anti-government demonstrations calling for the end of the rule of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

According to sources, now the protests seem to be slowing down, while the internet has also been shut down. Several European countries, including France, Spain, Finland, Belgium and Germany, have summoned Iranian ambassadors because of the violence. Britain has also done so, citing the “brutal killing of Iranian protesters”.

read more: : Iran arrests seven people with British links after anti-government protests

Source link

Paramount Skydance steps up its hostile bid for Warner Bros. Discovery with lawsuit money news.

0

A hostile takeover bid for media giant Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) has intensified and entertainment conglomerate Paramount has taken legal action to force the release of financial data.

Paramount Skydance,

which owns film production company Paramount Pictures and TV network CBS, has filed a legal suit seeking to force WBD to tell shareholders how much it values ​​Netflix’s bid and competing offers.

It has also threatened to nominate directors at the WBD annual meeting in an attempt to get board approval for its takeover.

Paramount’s bid was hostile because it involved direct contact with WBD’s shareholders. The board had already agreed to an $82.7 billion (£61.4 billion) deal with Netflix in early December to sell its TV studios and rights to top franchises, including Harry Potter and Game of Thrones.

The board of Warner Bros. Discovery unanimously recommended that shareholders accept Netflix’s offer to purchase the streaming portion of WBD’s business and Paramount reject Skydance’s offer.

David Allison, the chairman, chief executive of Paramount Skydance and son of billionaire Larry Ellison, said his company is seeking to release information about how WBD valued several elements of streaming as part of Netflix’s rival acquisition effort, Paramount Skydance’s own offer and WBD’s own valuation.

It is customary to make such disclosures The board reads an open letter to WBD shareholders when it recommends an investment.

The streaming wing of WBD’s business was already being spun off into a separate company that included units like TV network HBO and its streaming service HBO Max, as well as the TV and film production units of Warner Bros. and comic book filmmaker DC Studios.

But Mr Ellison said Paramount Skydance will propose a change to WBD bylaws that would require shareholder approval before spinning off the streaming portion, potentially creating hurdles in the sale process.

Other divisions of WBD include news channel CNN and sports network TNT.

What does Paramount Skydance want?

The hostile bidder is seeking engagement with the WBD board on its proposal, which it believes would be a “win-win for both companies.”. The Paramount Skydance offer is “simply higher” than Netflix’s, Mr Ellison said in the letter.

“We aimed for a collaborative negotiation and a successful transaction that would benefit both companies, shareholder groups, and all stakeholders,” Mr. Ellison stated in the letter.

“We are surprised WBD failed to respond to our December 4 proposal, clarify or negotiate its terms, or trade the contract markup with us.”

British and Irish talent win big at the Golden Globes

The offer was rejected by Paramount because it said it involved an “extraordinary amount of debt financing” that represented a risk to the closing of any deal.

How does it matter?

Any merger of WBD and Paramount Skydance or Netflix would be one of the largest media deals in history, with significant impacts on the potential future of TV, film production, and cinema.

Netflix has expressed doubt over the future of movie theatres, with films it produces playing short runs in theatres and some being released directly to streaming. Streaming giants owning film production companies could mean running fewer or shorter-term theaters for movies

If Paramount Skydance is successful in its takeover attempt, it would own CNN as well as CBS News, raising concerns about concentrating news services within a smaller number of companies.

WBD shares fell about 2%, while Paramount Skydance shares rose 0.5%.

What does WBD say?

Responding to the letter, WBD said, “Despite six weeks and multiple press releases from Paramount Skydance, it has yet to increase the price or address the many and obvious shortcomings of its proposal.

A spokesperson said, “Instead, Paramount Skydance is trying to distract attention with a meritless lawsuit and attacks on a board that has delivered unprecedented amounts of shareholder value.

Source link

Trump risks ending trade war with China through Iran’s tariff money news

1

At first glance, the announcement of 25% tariffs against any country that trades with Iran seems tantamount to Donald Trump escalating a global trade war.

But China, India’s largest trading partner, has kept its response quite brief and quite mild.

“There is no winner in the tariff war,” said Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning, adding that China will firmly safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.

Money Latest: ‘My teen’s bank account was frozen due to suspicious activity – but they won’t tell me what it was.’

it’s exactly the same kind of thing China says when it is still trying to figure out the details.

In fact, it seems reasonable to assume that China is on fire because, like the rest of the world, it is probably unsure how it will react to the new announcement Will it apply and to whom?

For example, there was no clarification on what exactly “doing business” with Iran entails and, crucially, whether such activities would be exempt from China’s tariff agreement with the US.

Theoretically, this additional tax should primarily target China.

chart visualization

Although it is Iran’s largest trading partner, it is one of a relatively limited list of countries still willing to circumvent US sanctions to buy from it, despite international backlash over the regime’s treatment of protesters demanding an end to clerical rule in the country.

Analysts estimate that China buys at least 80%, possibly as much as 90%, of the oil shipped from Iran. Exact figures have not been published.

China has significant investments in Iran.

Additionally, China has significant investments in Iran, with Chinese companies financing construction and infrastructure projects.

Will protests against Iran bring change?

However, the context of US-China relations is crucial in this situation.

Presidents Xi Jinping and Trump finally agreed to a ceasefire in November, bringing an end to the crippling trade war that had been raging for several months. Negotiations took several months to achieve the deal, which reduced China’s average tariff rate from 145% at the peak of the standoff to about 47%.

In exchange for these cuts, Trump secured some things that were important to him, such as an agreement to increase purchases of US soybeans, de-blacklisting some US companies; and easing access to critical rare earth minerals.

Trump’s warnings about Iran

Now China’s tariff rate increase will definitely provoke it to retaliate; all these hard-earned gains can be lost in an instant.

Add to the mix the fact that Trump says he plans to visit Beijing in April and he has indicated that stability in the relationship is desirable, and the likelihood of him making some sort of concession to China increases.

An example of this also exists.

Read more:
How Iran implemented internet blackout

Rights groups say more than 500 people have been killed in Iran.

Over the summer, an additional 25% tariff was imposed on India in retaliation for oil purchases from Russia.

Although China buys more from India, it was not treated equally, almost certainly because a comprehensive deal was in the process of being struck.

An additional 25% tariff would be punitive for China now, at a time when its economy is still struggling with slow growth and high unemployment. This would push the average rate to more than 70%—an amount that would make almost all trade with the US uneconomic.

But China has learnt in the last year that being strong and firm with Trump has paid off.

He knows he has the power and leverage to force a waiver, and there’s no doubt that’s what he’ll be doing behind the scenes.

If it doesn’t make sense, expect retaliation, and expect it to be severe.

Source link

Tragically, an avalanche buried a 12-year-old boy who was skiing with his family in the Austrian Alps.

1
A

Tragically, an avalanche buried a 12-year-old boy who was skiing off-piste with his family.

The scary incident happened today at 1 pm at the Sportgastein ski resort in Austria.

A
Ten mountain rescuers, a rescue helicopter and a police helicopter were dispatched to the scene. Credit: SN/Gustin Mountain Rescue

Ten mountain rescuers, three dog handlers, a rescue helicopter and a police helicopter team reached the spot.

The boy was pulled from under the snow before doctors performed 40 minutes of CPR to revive him.

Sadly, he was pronounced dead at the scene.

The boy from the Czech Republic was skiing with his family, who had come to the resort for a holiday on Sunday, when the accident occurred.

helicopter disaster

Helicopter crashes after becoming entangled in ski lift cables

Gerhard Kremser, district head of the mountain rescue service in Pongau, said, “The 12-year-old and another boy were skiing down a steep slope between avalanche barriers.”

Kremser said the pair “triggered an avalanche” between the steel beams.

Suddenly the 12-year-old boy got stuck in a layer of ice and collided with an obstacle.

This terrible accident happened about 100 metres above the Goldbergbahn middle station.

The boy’s family was evacuated to the valley by police helicopter Libelle.

Officials said he is currently being cared for by a crisis intervention team.

Alpine police are investigating the incident.

The incident comes just days after a tourist froze to death in Bad Gastein, a ski town near Austria’s Gastein Valley.

The 55-year-old Danish man was discovered by mountain rescue teams on the edge of a waterfall on Sunday afternoon after he was reported missing the previous evening.

He was last seen by friends around 10 pm on Saturday night, but he did not return to his residence.

Police, a search helicopter and mountain rescue teams swept across the area in a major operation to bring the situation under control for the missing man.

His body was found frozen in the snow on the riverbank step far away from the gushing drop of the waterfall.

Mountain Rescue received seven other call-outs that day due to the cold conditions.

District leader Gerhard Kremser said, “These include avalanches, injured off-piste skiers, stranded persons in alpine terrain and large-scale search operations with tragic, fatal consequences.”

He described it as one of the most intense days of the winter season in Pongau.

Source link

Microsoft has rebranded its Office software, and many users are unhappy about the changes.

1

Microsoft Office has informed 400 million users about the rebranding exercise, which integrates their famous software suite with its AI tool, Copilot.

The facade of the French headquarters of Microsoft, an American multinational company that develops, manufactures, licenses, and markets computer software

Microsoft Office users have criticized the rebranding of the software (stock) (Image: HJBC/iStock via Getty Images ).

Microsoft Office users have criticised the company’s latest rebranding process after it changed the name of its popular software suite. The package, which includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and OneNote, was first released by Bill Gates’ global corporation in 1990 and has 400 million users worldwide.

However, last week, users received a dialogue box informing them that it had been renamed. It read, “Welcome to the Microsoft 365 Copilot app.” “Microsoft 365 Copilot apps (formerly Office) let you create, share, and collaborate all in one place with your favourite apps, now including Copilot.”

Content cannot be displayed without consent

Copilot was founded in 2023 as a replacement for Cortana, and it is an AI chatbot that allows users to maximise their productivity by generating content and automating tasks.

Upon hearing news of the change, software creator and entrepreneur Peter Deden said, “RIP MS Office. RIP Microsoft 365. It’s now ‘Microsoft 365 Copilot’.

“We’re one rebrand away from Excel being a prompt box that says, ‘Trust me, bro, the math checks out.'”

Another person said, “Microsoft Office is one of the most recognisable brands in the world. This is worse than Twitter changing its name to X. I want to have a 2-hour podcast discussion with the middle manager who approved this decision.”

A third pointed out, “This is stupid and brand destroying, yes, but note that the brand destruction actually happened in 2020 when they changed the name of Office to ‘Microsoft 365’ – it had nothing to do with AI.”

While a fourth

Microsoft shared the reason behind the rebranding, saying, “Microsoft 365 (Office) apps are now called Microsoft 365 Copilot apps on the web (office.com, microsoft365.com), mobile (iOS, Android), and Windows. The new app name and icon reflect the integration of Copilot within Microsoft 365 apps.”

It added: “The Microsoft 365 Copilot app serves as your everyday productivity app for work and life. But in the age of AI and Copilot integration, it has become much more than that. We’ve made a number of improvements to the work and education experience, as well as for consumers with personal accounts.”

Meanwhile, Gareth Oystrick, senior director of marketing for Microsoft 365, responded to the criticism, saying, “We haven’t made any recent naming changes to our Office apps. Office apps Word, Excel, and PowerPoint remain unchanged within the Microsoft 365 productivity suite.

“In November 2022, we renamed the Office ‘Hub’-only app to Microsoft 365 apps for web and mobile. In January 2025, we updated it to Microsoft 365 Copilot apps to reflect its role in bringing Copilot and Microsoft 365 productivity experiences into one place.”

Microsoft advised users, “Existing users with work and personal accounts may see these changes across their web (Office.com, Microsoft365.com), mobile (iOS, Android), and Windows apps.

“If you’re signed in and still don’t see the changes, verify that you’re connected to the Internet and then restart the Microsoft 365 Copilot app.”

Source link

Industry rings new alarm over Reeves’s ISA reforms. money news

1



The investment industry has stepped up warnings to the government over plans to limit cash ISAs, arguing they risk reducing the willingness of British investors to back listed companies.

Sky News has learnt that a meeting on Tuesday involving officials from the Treasury and HM Revenue and Customs, as well as major industry players, including Hargreaves Lansdown, HSBC, and Lloyds Banking Group, led to a heated exchange of words over the implications of the Treasury’s reforms.

Money Blog: Royal Mail is launching 24-hour parcel service

Under plans confirmed by Rachel Reeves in November’s Budget, the Cash ISA allowance will be reduced from £20,000 to £12,000 from April 2027, except for savers under the age of 65.

The Chancellor said the move aims to encourage more investment in the UK stock market, with £8,000 balances available to invest in stocks and shares ISA products.

The Treasury and HMRC are now preparing detailed anti-fraud rules, including banning transfers from stocks and shares and Innovative Finance ISAs to cash ISAs; The use of tests to determine whether an investment is worth holding in a stocks and shares ISA or is ‘cash-like’; And charges on any interest paid on stocks and shares or cash held in an Innovative Finance ISA.

The investment industry has been vocal in warning.

However, the investment industry has been vocal in warning that the rule changes will add complexity and penalise savers who are focused on derisking their portfolios before the age of 65.

There are also growing concerns that a more robust approach to taxing cash balances held in stocks and shares in ISAs would seriously damage their image as a tax-free investment option.

Any evidence that the reforms are weakening stock market investment ahead of the next general election would be damaging for Ms Reeves, who has directed the industry to work on a multimillion-pound campaign aimed at promoting retail investment to the public.

Many companies have already backed out from participating in that campaign due to cost and coordination concerns.

One industry person who attended Tuesday’s talks said, “It became clear at today’s meeting that significant reforms to ISAs are being made with very little understanding of how retail investors behave or the range of potential unintended consequences.

The implementation of fundamentally flawed changes has placed HMRC in a dangerous position.

“Rather than rushing into something that risks undermining retail investment, the Chancellor should go back to the drawing board and build an evidence base for sensible, long-term reforms aimed at supporting retail investors.”

The reforms will be subject to a consultation period, with draft legislation – in the form of amendments to ISA rules —being put before Parliament well before April 2027.

In the 2023-24 tax year, savers invested a record £103 billion in ISAs, of which almost two-thirds – £70 billion – was invested in cash ISAs.

Others present at Tuesday’s meeting included the Building Societies’ Association, AJ Bell, Fidelity, Vanguard and the Investment Association.

A government spokesperson said, “To encourage more investment in stocks and shares, we are making changes to ISA rules that will prevent breaches of the new lower cash ISA limit.

“We are already working closely with the industry and will publish clear guidance before the changes are implemented.”



Source link

BBC is filing a motion to dismiss Trump’s defamation suit regarding the editing of Panorama, according to court documents.

1

The BBC has requested the court effectively prevent the parties from collecting most of the evidence until the motion is decided.

Court documents reveal that the BBC plans to dismiss Donald Trump’s lawsuit over the January 6 Panorama edit.

us The president filed a defamation case Over the broadcaster’s editing of a speech he gave in 2021, the day his supporters stormed the Capitol building.

Clips of parts of the US President’s speech were stitched together, showing him saying, “We’re walking to the Capitol… and I’ll be there with you. And we fight. We engage in intense battles.

The nearly hour-long documentary Trump: A Second Chance? The BBC broadcasted it one week before the US elections.

us President is seeking $5bn (£3.7bn) in damages as part of a defamation suit. Additionally, they have brought a $5 billion lawsuit alleging violations of the law on trade practices. Both lawsuits were filed in Florida.

In November, American correspondent James Matthews described the trial.

A BBC spokesperson said in a statement,

A BBC spokesperson said in a statement, “As we have previously made clear, we will defend this matter. We are not going to comment further on ongoing legal proceedings.”

Court documents show the broadcaster will file a motion to dismiss the lawsuits, claiming the Florida court lacks “personal jurisdiction” over the organisation, the court venue is “improper”, and Mr Trump has “failed to state a claim”.

Read more:
Trump vs BBC: everything you need to know

Victory doesn’t really matter to Trump. It’s about pressure – a warning to his critics

katie spencer

katie spencer

Arts and Entertainment Correspondent

The BBC is retaliating.

If you read the legal filings and the grounds for which the corporation wants to dismiss the case, they are convincing.

The case’s filing location, Florida, forms the core of their argument. For a case against a British broadcaster, such an arrangement never made much sense.

He says Trump’s own legal team has provided a link to the Panorama episode, which viewers in the US cannot watch unless they use a VPN.

Would it be enough to throw it out?

This was always a curious affair, but let’s not forget that for Trump, it doesn’t really matter whether he succeeds or fails – this is designed to exert pressure; this is a high-profile warning shot to those who are personally critical of him and his administration.

Even if Trump doesn’t get his billions of dollars, the lawsuit is a form of leverage. But for a public service broadcaster, which is ultimately accountable to the taxpayers, being caught in such a situation is even more embarrassing and painful.

Given the prolonged uncertainty and significant legal costs, the BBC really needs to shut its operations down.

The corporation will argue that it did not create, produce, or broadcast the documentary in Florida, and that Mr. Trump’s claim about the documentary’s availability in the US on BritBox is false.

It will also claim that the president failed to allege that the broadcaster published the documentary with “actual malice.”

The BBC has requested the court effectively prevent the parties from collecting most of the evidence until the motion is decided.

Tim Davie resigns as Director General of the BBC. Photo: PA
image:
Tim Davie resigns as Director General of the BBC. Photo: PA

The broadcasterapologised to the US President in November for “error of judgement” but said it disagreed that there were “grounds for a defamation claim”.

The fallout from the saga led to the resignation of both BBC director general Tim Davie and head of news Deborah Terness.

Should the case continue, a hearing date of 2027 has been proposed.



Source link